Well it’s better than him playing crap!ive already said he’s not been good enough I just thought he did better in the previous 2 games which we won which is why I asked why wouldn’t he of started him against city.i know what I’m talking about mate I go the games i don’t sit at home watching them on tv
Bit difficult to do when I'm halfway across the world. My point was that Sigurdson was ok to start those previous two games, but against Man City there was a high probability that we would get overrun by City. We should have attacked them like we did in the second half with the attacking formation.
Yes, we would have conceded but we were more defensive from the start of the game, with Sigurdson in midfield, and still conceded, Attacking them was the best way to counter their style (my opinion). Same with Liverpool on Sunday. We sit back and defend and we will get hammered.