KIRKBY MOVE REJECTED

[GrandOldTeam]

So, what now?

Not to worry, apparently theres LOADS of sites.

LCC and KEIOC keep telling us we can plonk a 60,000 seater stadium in various sites, all viable.

 

[GhostOfDixie]

Not to worry, apparently theres LOADS of sites.

LCC and KEIOC keep telling us we can plonk a 60,000 seater stadium in various sites, all viable.

A joint a stadium would be financially beneficial to both clubs. Plus it may well reduce some of the animosity between the clubs.

 

[fozzy]

Not to worry, apparently theres LOADS of sites.

LCC and KEIOC keep telling us we can plonk a 60,000 seater stadium in various sites, all viable.

stanley park shared stadium is the first place lcc will be looking at!

and i think that would be a good move!

 

[GhostOfDixie]

stanley park shared stadium is the first place lcc will be looking at!

and i think that would be a good move!

as long as it's 50/50.

 

[GrandOldTeam]

A joint a stadium would be financially beneficial to both clubs. Plus it may well reduce some of the animosity between the clubs.

That aside, theres all these other sites apparently.

Be interesting to see what LCC do now........ won't it?

I'm not too confident.

 

[steevie]

Stay away from TW and BK and the likes then

Never visit those sites anyway mate. Just remember a volatile thread regarding the Kirkby situation about a year ago and it got quite heated. Past experiences and all that.

 

[chicoazul]

Not to worry, apparently theres LOADS of sites.

LCC and KEIOC keep telling us we can plonk a 60,000 seater stadium in various sites, all viable.

Superb. Well, I look forward to them taking centre stage and making it happen then.

Can't wait to hear what they'll say.

 

[steevie]

A joint a stadium would be financially beneficial to both clubs. Plus it may well reduce some of the animosity between the clubs.

Absolutely NO WAY!! Please dont mention ground share again Nick.

 

[GhostOfDixie]

That aside, theres all these other sites apparently.

Be interesting to see what LCC do now........ won't it?

I'm not too confident.

I'm not, but I am actually excited though. Something new will have to develop, it simply must.

 

[fozzy]

as long as it's 50/50.

oh defo! half blue half [Poor language removed]! and all that!

 

[Sharpys top lip]

We'v just lost 3-2 an i dont give a fukk........



Kirkby's fukked off......





Thank god.....







Drinks bleach in celebration**

 

[GrandOldTeam]

I'm not, but I am actually excited though. Something new will have to develop, it simply must.

Liverpool can't even get a ground sorted. Without commercial backing, what chance have we got?

The ground share is a non starter, it simply won't happen. If we don't, Liverpool have too much pride to allow that. If you think KEIOC provided stern opposition, imagine what their lot would get together if LCC even attempted it?

Stadium without backing (Tesco): No Chance
Shared stadium: No chance.
Our own stadium in central Liverpool?: No chance.

 

[chicoazul]

Cool. Watch us move on now.

One things for sure, those screaming for glamour signings that have been vocal against the move can shut the [Poor language removed] up.

 

[best little spaniard]

Watch us try and relocate to Speke

 

[SuitsBlueX2]

This should bloody force alternatives to the fore.

If not, this board is more incompetent than I thought.

I fully expect a statement tomorrow from them saying how they're gonna fight the decision.

That is genuine quality that. Board goes one way, then you expect a complete 180 turn? This board? Any board? competence? Contradiction in terms!