Current Affairs King Charles III

[catcherintherye]

I'm trying not to be so explicit (ooh err) with any confrontations. (not pretending to be perfect either)
When it becomes a war of words all that happens is the temperature goes up like the walls do.
Addressing the facts and staying fluid with new info is about the best we can do, all of us, as evidence comes to the fore we recalculate - helluva segue - ironically I strongly suspect all the checks (cheques?) and balances and the details of financials will be being poured over by some of the most stringent minds the country has to sniff out any and all options to crush 'Sister Space' and its operators.

special treatment for minorities remember...

That's fair enough mate.

I'm not perfect either, far from it. I give my views as fairly as possible, for better or worse.

 

[Rita_Poon]

That's fair enough mate.

I'm not perfect either, far from it. I give my views as fairly as possible, for better or worse.

I value the forum, it has some dizzying highs, terrifying lows, and creamy middles. There's a few divs but in the main a lot of good eggs, spoonful of humour helps the medicine I reckon. We're all gonna need one another over the next 6 months, and the club could need us as one once again.
Bet his maj is gutted he isn't knighting Kane and the gang to distract from the Harry & Meghan fiasco that has so spectacularly gathered pace.

 

[d34noj]

So nothing conclusively shows on companies house?

God knows mate, i'm not 100% au-fait with it. If it was all conclusive she would have been hung/drawn/quartered for it already.

All I know is anyone who uses a charity for their own monetary gain is a scumbag. Regardless of whether they're a race baiting/appropriating liar is another matter entirely.

 

[Spadge Vernacular]

Have a read of what Clarkson has put mate. Its beyond the pale.

I'm astonished you are comparing that to a woman who runs a domestic violence charity.

As for insinuations of racism, you called me a racist, without explaining how or why.

But hey ho. I think what Clarkson has done is egregious, and qualitatively worse than anything I've seen from Ngozi. But do feel free to show me where she has called for a woman to be stripped naked and assaulted by groups of men and I'll happily review.

You would expect an exec of a business/charity to handle matters professionally. Whenever I face issues in work related situations there are norms of behaviour in dealing with situations. She could have taken the woman to one side and said something if she felt uncomfortable by the conversation, or after the event raised her concerns privately with the palace. But she did not as she was there on a mission and chose to stay and enjoy herself after ‘the abuse’ had happened.

She has said in the media though that Camilla wanted to bring attention to domestic abuse but that she wanted to bring attention to racism. She is after all, an activist and supported by the Black Lives Matter movement and makes her money from a race related proposition.

It seems that she changed her name to Ngozi Fulani the year she set up Sistah Space. A sensible move as on grant and fund applications for a race based charity for black women Ngozi Fulani does hit the target better than Melanie Headley. Sistah Space survive on race related fund raising so need publicity.

It is worth noting that she was not invited to the event but went along as a plus one.

Melanie is a known opponent of the Royal family and has no worries with posting anti royal comments on social media. We might rightfully ask why would an anti-royalist race baiter want to attend a royal event hosted by the Queen Consort?

It seems clear that she was purposely trying to create a situation in not answering what was a very ordinary question. I note that no other of the attendees (BAME) have come out with claims of being racially abused at the event.

Was it 17 times that she says she was questioned? Not 16, or 14, or 20, which does suggest the way the conversation was later transcribed that it had been recorded. These events are cordial networking events, light of mood and there to connect people. If she has taken a recording device, then I cannot help but ask why?

She says that being touched at the event (name badge) was abuse. Yet at the same time she is pictured touching someone. Was this abuse?



It is obvious what she has been up to and there are simply too many red flags and this is just touching the surface of Melanies grift.

Unfortunately, racism exists, this situation wasn’t it and just makes it harder for the real issues to be addressed.

 

[Spadge Vernacular]

 

[Spadge Vernacular]

 

[catcherintherye]

You would expect an exec of a business/charity to handle matters professionally. Whenever I face issues in work related situations there are norms of behaviour in dealing with situations. She could have taken the woman to one side and said something if she felt uncomfortable by the conversation, or after the event raised her concerns privately with the palace. But she did not as she was there on a mission and chose to stay and enjoy herself after ‘the abuse’ had happened.

She has said in the media though that Camilla wanted to bring attention to domestic abuse but that she wanted to bring attention to racism. She is after all, an activist and supported by the Black Lives Matter movement and makes her money from a race related proposition.

It seems that she changed her name to Ngozi Fulani the year she set up Sistah Space. A sensible move as on grant and fund applications for a race based charity for black women Ngozi Fulani does hit the target better than Melanie Headley. Sistah Space survive on race related fund raising so need publicity.

It is worth noting that she was not invited to the event but went along as a plus one.

Melanie is a known opponent of the Royal family and has no worries with posting anti royal comments on social media. We might rightfully ask why would an anti-royalist race baiter want to attend a royal event hosted by the Queen Consort?

It seems clear that she was purposely trying to create a situation in not answering what was a very ordinary question. I note that no other of the attendees (BAME) have come out with claims of being racially abused at the event.

Was it 17 times that she says she was questioned? Not 16, or 14, or 20, which does suggest the way the conversation was later transcribed that it had been recorded. These events are cordial networking events, light of mood and there to connect people. If she has taken a recording device, then I cannot help but ask why?

She says that being touched at the event (name badge) was abuse. Yet at the same time she is pictured touching someone. Was this abuse?

View attachment 197334

It is obvious what she has been up to and there are simply too many red flags and this is just touching the surface of Melanies grift.

Unfortunately, racism exists, this situation wasn’t it and just makes it harder for the real issues to be addressed.

At the risk of going back and forth over and over on specific points, as I appreciate this has been covered, I have 2 overarching points.

1) Virtually none of what you describe is objectively wrong. I can see why it may offend some people, but others would take a different view. Touching peoples shoulder, supporting a campaign to raise awareness about police killing of unarmed black people and asserting their lives matter, being a republican etc is not inherently wrong.

I appreciate you may not agree with those things, but they are perfectly valid expressions in an objective sense.

2) Even if you content they are objectively wrong, there is a question of scale here. None of them are calling for a woman to be stripped naked and physically assaulted by gangs of men. The scale is qualitatively different.

I hope you can recognise this. If you cant, you are just letting your irrational hatred for a black woman cloud your judgement over right and wrong.

 

[Nightman]

You would expect an exec of a business/charity to handle matters professionally. Whenever I face issues in work related situations there are norms of behaviour in dealing with situations. She could have taken the woman to one side and said something if she felt uncomfortable by the conversation, or after the event raised her concerns privately with the palace. But she did not as she was there on a mission and chose to stay and enjoy herself after ‘the abuse’ had happened.

She has said in the media though that Camilla wanted to bring attention to domestic abuse but that she wanted to bring attention to racism. She is after all, an activist and supported by the Black Lives Matter movement and makes her money from a race related proposition.

It seems that she changed her name to Ngozi Fulani the year she set up Sistah Space. A sensible move as on grant and fund applications for a race based charity for black women Ngozi Fulani does hit the target better than Melanie Headley. Sistah Space survive on race related fund raising so need publicity.

It is worth noting that she was not invited to the event but went along as a plus one.

Melanie is a known opponent of the Royal family and has no worries with posting anti royal comments on social media. We might rightfully ask why would an anti-royalist race baiter want to attend a royal event hosted by the Queen Consort?

It seems clear that she was purposely trying to create a situation in not answering what was a very ordinary question. I note that no other of the attendees (BAME) have come out with claims of being racially abused at the event.

Was it 17 times that she says she was questioned? Not 16, or 14, or 20, which does suggest the way the conversation was later transcribed that it had been recorded. These events are cordial networking events, light of mood and there to connect people. If she has taken a recording device, then I cannot help but ask why?

She says that being touched at the event (name badge) was abuse. Yet at the same time she is pictured touching someone. Was this abuse?

View attachment 197334

It is obvious what she has been up to and there are simply too many red flags and this is just touching the surface of Melanies grift.

Unfortunately, racism exists, this situation wasn’t it and just makes it harder for the real issues to be addressed.

Yet more word salad of complete and utter irrelevance, in relation to the incident. And no matter how much you look to muddy the waters, that incident happened and it was casual rasism.

And your continuous deadnaming of this woman wasn't funny the first time. Total disrespect.

You absolutely have a bias here. Subconsciously or otherwise. The videos you've posted above this post. What the hell? Shall I post a couple of vids of people with opposing views? All your evidencing is your own derangement over this.

 

[Prevenger17]

Ah yer wan seems like a bit of a gobshite tbf

 

[Yarrgh]

This thread is a bit like his reign. Charlie boy sure likes all the peripheral issues taking the attention off him.

The perfect scenario for him I reckon.

 

[Charlie Sweet]

Every time I see this thread at the top of the forum I think for a second he's dead.

Oh well.

 

[Spadge Vernacular]

At the risk of going back and forth over and over on specific points, as I appreciate this has been covered, I have 2 overarching points.

1) Virtually none of what you describe is objectively wrong. I can see why it may offend some people, but others would take a different view. Touching peoples shoulder, supporting a campaign to raise awareness about police killing of unarmed black people and asserting their lives matter, being a republican etc is not inherently wrong.

I appreciate you may not agree with those things, but they are perfectly valid expressions in an objective sense.

2) Even if you content they are objectively wrong, there is a question of scale here. None of them are calling for a woman to be stripped naked and physically assaulted by gangs of men. The scale is qualitatively different.

I hope you can recognise this. If you cant, you are just letting your irrational hatred for a black woman cloud your judgement over right and wrong.

Marlene has pushed the race card, and stoked division all to suit her business, to pay for her holidays etc and in doing so has caused all kinds of problems. The push back from the Marlenes of this world, just make things more difficult for us as they are race agitators, not healers. If you are white, which I assume that you are then I'd suggest that your ire or efforts to help us are misplaced . Our communities don't benefit from having Marlene types dividing people as those with prejudice just use these things to add fuel to the fire.

This was never a situation about race. Marlene doesn't represent the community. She has engineered this as she is a race baiting grifter and those supporting her are not helping us as if I am being frank, you won't feel the push back. You seemingly will not allow yourself to understand the things that I am saying because the most important thing in this moment is your hatred of the estblishment and Royals. If you were stood in my shoes and saw how these people and their agendas impact those around you, your loved ones you might be inclined to let go of your hate and to view the sitaution objectively.

 

[spectateur]

Yeah and that's fine mate. But despite that, there are normally good, rational GOT posters who aren't accepting this and calling the victim all sorts.

There are always some topics that make normally good rational posters irrational.
For example on the world cups thread there are posters who hate the French and particularly the president.
They call the French team monkeys who surrender ffs. Racist and they seem to get away with it.

 

[Rita_Poon]

reference/homage to the above. Like when someone throws in a 'one louder' comment.

 

[MikeH72]

Wonder what was the last page Charles’ name was mentioned in his own thread.