That's exactly what he is saying when he argues that men and women can't work together.
Jordan Peterson Thread.
- Thread starter mezzrow
- Start date
- Status
That's exactly what he is saying when he argues that men and women can't work together.
neil999
Player Valuation: £80m
Man I'm rubbish at that. However I can turn a lesbian(feminist one) while shooting a wolf
I agree with you.
What i heard was... Makeup is provocative, he suggests lipstick turns lips red and its is an arousal thing, oh and heels are there to exaggerate sexual attraction.
Oh and men haven't learned how to work with women because its only been 40 years.
Pretty sure there are rules in the workplace too which he says there are not because men and women can possibly have the rules defined after again 40 years.
I can only advise you not to go on what was a 2 hour Vice segment that has been compressed and edited to 10 minutes, but if that's what you think he was arguing I suspect you've already made your mind up on the guy and it's not for changing. Let's go back to mocking Adversus together
I wore tight leather chaps to work and got a disciplinary. How’s that fair?! Screw you JP
I ain't falling out with you over this idiot.
A word of warning @Prevenger17... @LinekersLegs has liked my posts about Jordan.
Prepare to get you arse handed to you by a woman.
Prepare to get you arse handed to you by a woman.
Related points from Bret Weinstein.
Weinstein is a smart fella who was treated incredibly poorly by students and the administration at the university he used to work for. He echoes similar points as Peterson (i.e., parts of the left are quite ready to turn on its own and blinkered to free speech values), but he is qualitatively different from Peterson in the overall message he conveys to the public.
Sy-
Player Valuation: £8m
Bought his book off the back of the (full) channel 4 interview, but didn't get far as his points of reference are sometimes too obscure and I'm just not that much of an intellectual / historian / philosopher, but I have watched quite a lot of his lectures since.
Of the interview itself, there's no doubt he absolutely schooled that particular embarrassment of a "feminist" and her ridiculous, bratty entitled nonsense, no solid logic or argument, just high negative emotion and low intelligence.
That said, I hadn't seen some of the stuff in here on Peterson's outright anti-female sentiment, it's disappointing and a little confusing, especially since in a few of his lectures he speaks so highly of high performing female clients he's worked with as a clinical psychologist (to better their careers, ironically).
I can only assume he's worked out he can gain more by appealing more directly to, and stirring up his key demographic... "turbo virgins". I don't know whether to commend his commercial nous or condemn him for selling out.
Of the interview itself, there's no doubt he absolutely schooled that particular embarrassment of a "feminist" and her ridiculous, bratty entitled nonsense, no solid logic or argument, just high negative emotion and low intelligence.
That said, I hadn't seen some of the stuff in here on Peterson's outright anti-female sentiment, it's disappointing and a little confusing, especially since in a few of his lectures he speaks so highly of high performing female clients he's worked with as a clinical psychologist (to better their careers, ironically).
I can only assume he's worked out he can gain more by appealing more directly to, and stirring up his key demographic... "turbo virgins". I don't know whether to commend his commercial nous or condemn him for selling out.
Last edited:
This is exactly the response he deserves: serious but unserious. Nothing more since he is not a deep thinker. He's a penis with a bible, a thesaurus, and the Oxford Companion to Philosophy (and serious Daddy issues).
longers
Parcheggia l'autobus
He’s been getting triggered by a teen vogue article on Karl Marx today lol
Imagine posting that shortly after being in radio 4 where youve repeated the sentence “teaching something isn’t advocating for it” over and over.
He’s the absolute worst and contradicts himself on twitter all the time.
Imagine posting that shortly after being in radio 4 where youve repeated the sentence “teaching something isn’t advocating for it” over and over.
He’s the absolute worst and contradicts himself on twitter all the time.
Last edited:
- Status