But again that's just ignoring the actual point being made to just keep parroting the same line. We can't just pretend that we didn't invest a significant amount of money (in relative terms) on improving the squad just because you don't think it's paid dividends. We could have just kept loads of the players we let go if we wanted to, but instead we chose to spend more money and bring in different players with a view to upgrading.
As I said in the first place, if that hasn't worked then questions obviously need to be asked about the people making the decisions.
I'm not saying we actually have a better squad, just that it's totally fair to say that we should have a better squad given the decisions we made. All teams partake in player trading, this isn't something that's peculiar to us, as i've already said Isak could score less goals for Liverpool this year than Nunez did last year but we wouldn't accept their fans saying 'well ackchooally we just replaced like for like so we were never likely to improve', because it would be ridiculous. The same applies here.