...or the war monger who's helped butcher 35,000 innocent people...let's not forget our other *option* here.
I don't have to dance on the head of any pin. To hope that a man masquerading as a progressive (but who is equally if not more guilty than his opponent) is defeated is not an endorsement or advocation to vote for his opponent.
It seems to me its YOU,
@Goat and
@Walken that refuses to answer the question here and you lot who prefers to obfuscate. The question is: why do you advocate on behalf of a president and party that have aided war crimes against an innocent population and has played a huge role in the murder of 35,000 men, women and children?
There are Democratic activists and voters prepared to face that question and prepared to oppose their own party in November on exactly that issue.