As far as I'm concerned Israel are well within their rights to murder as many children in retaliation as they like.
Fixed so it says what you're actually thinking.
As far as I'm concerned Israel are well within their rights to murder as many children in retaliation as they like.
No, they aren’t. Isrsel are blowing up civilian sites and killing 10,000 innocents because of the actions of a terrorist organisation 1 month agoSo they're using human shields then?
Which one is it? Either they are or they aren't.
So, the killing of 10,000 civilians is now excused?Finally someone with knowledge.
And that's about the crux of it.
Oh wow, that card!! Get a grip ffsA few of you should just come out and say you don’t like Jews, it would make it easier on all of us if you did.
They already do.No, they aren’t. Isrsel are blowing up civilian sites and killing 10,000 innocents because of the actions of a terrorist organisation 1 month ago
Even you must concede that the indiscriminate bombing of civilians for a month solid (after 70 years of torment) is unjust. These children did not attack Israelis, nor did these women.
It’s the most blatant war crimes imaginable and all those who see no wrong in it are culpable
One day in the future when the horror comes to light, many of you will look pretty stupid
Unfortunately, they only see what they want to see. I’ve never met anyone who knows the situation in Gaza side with Israel .They already do.
They just go with the usual guff about the bible and promised land. It makes me worry that they think the bible is based on facts.Unfortunately, they only see what they want to see. I’ve never met anyone who knows the situation in Gaza side with Israel .
I had to laugh at the irony of the final sentence, the ‘colonial occupiers’ bit, when he’s happy enough for Vlad to colonise Ukraine.It was a very strange response
I think once all this blows over it'll have been significantly less than that figure too.1700 weren’t killed, highest estimate was 1400, some have it at 1000.
They took 200 hostages not 300.
There’s been no evidence of any rapes and absolutely zero evidence of babies being microwaved, but a shedload of evidence of Israel actually bombing babies in hospitals.
If they’re within the right to defend themselves, Are Israel within their rights to bomb schools, hospitals and bakeries? You do know they’ve literally said “it’s not about accuracy it’s about destruction.”
As for being “offered peace 5 times” if someone takes money out of your account and offers to give you some of it back and you refuse, are you then the baddie for not accepting these terms?
So to go back to your question, you should be asking “which bit IS factually correct?”
I think once all this blows over it'll have been significantly less than that figure too.
In the hundreds certainly...and a terrible loss of life...a massacre. But the Israeli government have been spinning this 1,400 number and it's being questioned a lot now.
More than likely the Palestinian losses right now are going to be well over the 10,000 recorded. It's probably nearer 15,000-20,000.
The IDF were indiscriminately shelling the area, no care for who they hit.TBF I am reasonably sure the Israeli death figures are reasonably correct, but the question is who killed many of them. A lot of them were clearly Hamas, but there are real questions about those in the Kibbutzim who were still there when the IDF arrived.
How do you mean?TBF I am reasonably sure the Israeli death figures are reasonably correct, but the question is who killed many of them. A lot of them were clearly Hamas, but there are real questions about those in the Kibbutzim who were still there when the IDF arrived.
How do you mean?
And on the numbers: I think what maybe happens is that when you open the door up to questioning one side's reported figures (as the Israelis and Yanks have done with the Gaza authority declared casualty totals) then question marks get raised about the validity of the figures concerning the amount of Israeli dead...that's the trade off when propaganda is used.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.