Initial 10, then reduced to 6 + 2 Point Deductions

It's not independent in reality.
What they are referring to is in the report, it says "the PL's submissions", where they explain what they think the sanction should be, then "LCFC's submissions", where Leicester say what they think the sanction should be. It's just the League's side of the argument.

@Rollo Tomassi can laugh all he likes, but he's clearly misunderstanding it.
 
What they are referring to is in the report, it says "the PL's submissions", where they explain what they think the sanction should be, then "LCFC's submissions", where Leicester say what they think the sanction should be. It's just the League's side of the argument.

@Rollo Tomassi can laugh all he likes, but he's clearly misunderstanding it.

There are lots of conflicts of interest. But yes they are supposedly like the Prosection.

But unlike a normal good which is not a Kangaroo court, the Prosection also select and pay the judge, jury and executioner.

I would be very interested to know how Leicester got the same penalty as us.
 
What they are referring to is in the report, it says "the PL's submissions", where they explain what they think the sanction should be, then "LCFC's submissions", where Leicester say what they think the sanction should be. It's just the League's side of the argument.

@Rollo Tomassi can laugh all he likes, but he's clearly misunderstanding it.

It's about as independent as North Korea, and seeing as I work for ACAS then I am quite certain I understand what a claimant and a respondent is.
 

Similar Threads

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top