If we managed to get to the FA Cup final this season..

[Deco]

Someone posted about players being able to play in the cup if they're on loan, and it made me think of one question about if we managed to get to the FA Cup final (with our current squad).

If we got to the final, and it had to be against either:

1. Chelsea - without Lukaku
2. Man City - without Barry

What would you choose?

OR

 

[Eggs]

....neither, its written in the stars that we play Man Utd and deny Moyes his first proper trophy.

 

[Furey1878]

I went for Chelsea without Lukaku, as we've already proven that to be possible this season.

 

[radiostar]

Tough call.

Without Lukaku we are toothless though. He would be a bigger miss I think.

 

[bluejock]

Chelsea without Lukaku, no question.

 

[Deco]

I've had trouble choosing, I've gone with Chelsea without Lukaku because current squads against each other I think we'd do better than against City.

 

[Deco]

....neither, its written in the stars that we play Man Utd and deny Moyes his first proper trophy.

Could very well happen.. unless they reach the final of the LC

 

[roydo]

Good job Barcelona arnt in the FA Cup. Would make the choice more difficult.

 

[Garrick]

Chelsea without Lukaku, no question. Not only are Man City the better team, but Barry is more crucial to the Martinez system.

 

[barneygumble]

I think i chose the wrong option, i'd go for Chelsea, because i think Manchester City, are just gonna steamroll their way through the rest of the season!


either way, Jelavic will come on with 5 minutes to go, be offside, but score the winner, and all blues will go 'SWERVE LUKAKU, JELAVIC IS THE SAVIOUR!'

 

[Netromelo]

City are better than Chelsea but Lukaku seems to be more important to us than Barry (after all it's all about scoring goals, and he's one we can rely on to do just that). I can't decide. Depends on who we sign in January really. A quality striker in and I'd rather play Chelsea without Lukaku.

 

[jonny4288]

our midfield would be severely weakened and a distribution from the back would not be as good as it is without barry in there, we are scoring plenty of goals from the rest of the team so chelsea without lukaku, no brainer

 

[FTY]

We'd miss Barry more, no doubt.

 

[Ralphie Boy]

Would I get a ticket? I got a season ticket but no match stubs?

 

[4737carlin]

I have gone for the Chelsea option because we have a lot of other players scoring, even thou Lukaku adds much more than goals i think him out for a game wouldnt hurt as much as a weaker midfield