Current Affairs Harry and Meghan Part 3: I can't think of a snappy subtitle

[Blueclouds]

A key component at the top of our class system has flicked his middle finger at the entire British class system and the establishment and it's various institutions are having trouble controlling their sphincters did to multiple spasms.

It's this outrage culture fest we have on social media now, it's sicking that people can give an opinion on something they have no idea about. Watched the doc to see what the fuss was about and who frigging cares, until Harry tells the full story and who was racist then what the point in this racist debate? He was cut off at the age of 36 with millions in the bank, omg poor Harry.

 

[Joey66]

It is.

what not the trooping of the guards the whole inside they should give the place up as they hardly use it - at present Tours of Buckingham Palace are only offered during the summer months, and the majority of the rooms are closed to the public. However, The State Rooms, The Queen's Gallery and the Royal Mews are open to visitors.

Open it all year round in the daytime ......

 

[Joey66]

Pretty difficult to ignore an army of randy frogs to be fair.

Got rid of them castrated them having it away with my prize fish - surprised Megan never moaned about the Royal wildlife .....

 

[Joey66]

The Crown Estate generates a big chunk of the Queen's income. A lot of that is paid back in taxes/grants, too.

Crown Estate funding is very big in construction.

So no problem in paying Megan's wedding & Harry's grant back in full then now they are multi-millionaires.... off the back of it 12 months grace has backfired on the establishment paid by us the taxpayers .....
Titles should have been stripped from day one ......

 

[arminisgod]

Meghan pretty much lied about Archie not being a prince because of race. Millions of people will now believe that.

 

[Prevenger17]

Meghan pretty much lied about Archie not being a prince because of race. Millions of people will now believe that.

What a surprising angle you've taken on this

 

[arminisgod]

What a surprising angle you've taken on this

what angle? she told a blatant lie and used the very thing she has complained about to justify it.

 

[JimmyJeffers]

what angle? she told a blatant lie and used the very thing she has complained about to justify it.

What do you think about the royal family protecting an alleged sex offender?

 

[arminisgod]

What do you think about the royal family protecting an alleged sex offender?

Dreadful. What's that got to do with Meghan Markel lying?

 

[Wizard]

In fact the son would NEVER have been made a Prince as they suggested in the past tense under Royal protocols.


If you dont understand what "past tense" means then you keep going pal

I imagine you believe their claims and so are attempting to twist the facts to suit...

Good luck with that.




Watch the interview.

I imagine you don't believe their claims and so are attempting to twist the facts to suit.

Your first post I replied to:

Its the Monarch's children who are prince/princess.

Also the prince of Wales children who are prince/princess.

Thats the Royal protocol.

At no time was Meghan/Harry's child going to be a prince...its more spin.

Every line in this is you not just twisting facts to suit, but getting everything wrong. You then brought in the past tense and talking about never rather than just admitting you were wrong. On every point in this post.

If you don't understand what "getting everything wrong" means then you keep going pal

 

[JimmyJeffers]

Dreadful. What's that got to do with Meghan Markel lying?

She’s calling them out for being a horrible institution when for all intents and purposes, they’re a horrible institution. Don’t see why she’s getting blamed for all this.

 

[Marius57]

In fact the son would NEVER have been made a Prince as they suggested in the past tense under Royal protocols.


If you dont understand what "past tense" means then you keep going pal

I imagine you believe their claims and so are attempting to twist the facts to suit...

Good luck with that.




Watch the interview.

He would have been made prince once Charles takes to the throne as would have been the grandchild of a monarch. What Meghan was saying was that they were told that that wouldn't be happening as they are going to change the protocol (in line with the belief that Charles wants to scale it back).

Only george should be a prince, and not his siblings. But the Queen changed the rules for them to make all of Wills children prince/or Princess when really it should only be his eldest son.

They are changing protocol as and when they like, and Meghan was right, they are removing what would be Archies birthright, but only when Charles is King.

(Let's not get into whether people should have a birthright to be a monarch etc).

 

[Bedfordblue]

The antipodean Piers Morgan has spoken....

 

[DanEFC92]

 

[sbbefc]

She’s calling them out for being a horrible institution when for all intents and purposes, they’re a horrible institution. Don’t see why she’s getting blamed for all this.

They both come across as the spoilt brats that they are. But having said that 100% the above. The monarchy is a few hundred years out of date. Once Elizabeth dies I can't see it surviving in its current form for much longer. Hopefully the institution will cease to exist.