Current Affairs Harry and Meghan Part 3: I can't think of a snappy subtitle

Status
Not open for further replies.
"George V’s declaration sets out: “The grandchildren of the sons of any such sovereign in the direct male line (save only the eldest living son of the eldest son of the Prince of Wales) shall have and enjoy in all occasions the style and title enjoyed by the children of dukes of this realm.”"

Harry's child by Royal protocol would have been a Prince. You can talk about past tense or whatever and try to cover for the fact you said his child would "NEVER" have been a Prince but you are wrong

Youve made my point for me there...

He was born.

Royal protocol dictated he wasnt a prince.

He wasnt made a prince.

The end.


Edit: That quote also needs updating to 2013 i believe as well.
 
Youve made my point for me there...

He was born.

Royal protocol dictated he wasnt a prince.

He wasnt made a prince.

The end.


Edit: That quote also needs updating to 2013 i believe as well.
The Queen changed it so that it included first born female heirs being called Princesses in case William and Kate had a girl first.

Once again, you said Archie would "never" be a Prince. That is incorrect. Not talking about at birth. You said never. You were wrong
 
The Queen changed it so that it included first born female heirs being called Princesses in case William and Kate had a girl first.

Once again, you said Archie would "never" be a Prince. That is incorrect. Not talking about at birth. You said never. You were wrong

Not sure why youre explaining to me why your own quote wasnt updated after i pointed it out?

Once again, your point is irrelevant. You may not be talking about "at birth" but I have been hence repeatedly stating and using the "past tense"...
Well, your observation about the monarch's grandchildren has no affect whatsoever on whether their son should have been given the title of 'Prince'.

Their claim was in the past tense, not whether he would be made a prince if Prince Charles takes the throne, or anyone else.

A: Claim their son wasnt made a Prince due to racism -- lie.

B: Claim someone other than the Queen and her frailing 99 year old husband made a racist comment -- supporting 'A'.

In fact the son would NEVER have been made a Prince as they suggested in the past tense under Royal protocols.

Their son, by Royal Protocol is not a Prince.

Whether he could become a Prince or not is totally irrelevant to their claims.
 
Not sure why youre explaining to me why your own quote wasnt updated after i pointed it out?

Once again, your point is irrelevant. You may not be talking about "at birth" but I have been hence repeatedly stating and using the "past tense"...


Their son, by Royal Protocol is not a Prince.

Whether he could become a Prince or not is totally irrelevant to their claims.

Go play with your little toy red London bus. You can pretend it's gone near Buckingham palace and lick it's wheels.
 
If the Royal family were racist would they have allowed this Megan to be accepted into the family in the first place ?

I only seen a clip to me she is a great actress & has Harry well & truly under her thumb - good riddance to the pair of them making half founded allegations not naming names on who said this plus acted in racial undertones plus no mention of how much they got paid etc...
I am by no means a Roylist plus it needs to be set on a commercial money making system for our country e.g. Buckingham Palace should be opened as a museum for tourist .....
In today's world the asset should be used to pay their massive budget that never seems to be cut back like all others services etc.....
Plus far tooo many hangers on ......I feel it needs to be made into a commercial business concern to pay most of its own way ......
 
If the Royal family were racist would they have allowed this Megan to be accepted into the family in the first place ?

I only seen a clip to me she is a great actress & has Harry well & truly under her thumb - good riddance to the pair of them making half founded allegations not naming names on who said this plus acted in racial undertones plus no mention of how much they got paid etc...
I am by no means a Roylist plus it needs to be set on a commercial money making system for our country e.g. Buckingham Palace should be opened as a museum for tourist .....
In today's world the asset should be used to pay their massive budget that never seems to be cut back like all others services etc.....
Plus far tooo many hangers on ......I feel it needs to be made into a commercial business concern to pay most of its own way ......

There is more than one form of racism, or at least, xenophobia, which can lead to racism.

You don't have to spit at a black person on the street to be a racist.
 
Hope you aren't serious, because if so you're woefully naive.

They're going to make a mint from this, just not in direct interview fees. Indeed that's the whole and sole point of doing it.
Do you not think they just wanted their right of reply? Do you not think the main driver behind them doing this was to refute allegations made in the british press and get their side across? I don't think it's me who is woefully naive, it's you who is woefully assumptive.
 
If the Royal family were racist would they have allowed this Megan to be accepted into the family in the first place ?

I only seen a clip to me she is a great actress & has Harry well & truly under her thumb - good riddance to the pair of them making half founded allegations not naming names on who said this plus acted in racial undertones plus no mention of how much they got paid etc...
I am by no means a Roylist plus it needs to be set on a commercial money making system for our country e.g. Buckingham Palace should be opened as a museum for tourist .....
In today's world the asset should be used to pay their massive budget that never seems to be cut back like all others services etc.....
Plus far tooo many hangers on ......I feel it needs to be made into a commercial business concern to pay most of its own way ......
Hang on so its ok for the British press to release false stories about them and the royal family not correct any of it? "Unfounded allegations" I tend to believe the actual person when they reflect on an experience rather than "royal insider" "source"
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top