Current Affairs Gender Nonsence

[d34noj]

https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/anti-pride-posts-feature-photos-unrelated-lgbtq-events-2024-06-11/

First photo (the men on bikes?) nobody has mentioned.

2nd photo says 'no evidence it was taken at a Pride-related event' - yet there's no evidence contrary.

3rd photo says it was taken at Pride Toronto in 2023 (?!) but no evidence there's children present - yet a quick Getty Images search shows children present.

 

[d34noj]

Honest to God! Do you know what all of those minging priests, Saville, and the absolute multitude of perverts that have their convictions reported in each and every local newspaper up and down the country every single week of the year have in common? They are all MEN!

It’s bloody ridiculous to be making reference to the multitude of abuse that has regularly and consistently been perpetrated by men for centuries, and then comparing it to the tiny newfound population of ‘trans women’ as if they are two separate cohorts. The ‘trans women’ are men ffs! They are part of the same biological cohort that the minging priests belong to!

And just like in the ‘cis-male’ population (if we must use such newfound postmodern terminology) the vast majority of men are not raging perverts that wish to nonce people up at their local swimming baths or whatever, but some of them are, and they don’t come with labels that provide indicators of their perversions. The same will apply to the trans section of the male cohort. The majority won’t be perverts, but some of them will be.

It’s this reality that is one of the main reasons why society has provided safe spaces for women for centuries. Spaces where women are legally allowed to exclude men, and this exclusion has always equally applied to the non-perverted ‘cis-male’ majority just as much as it has applied to the predatory and perverted element of male society. It’s just a basic safeguarding measure, for crying out loud.

Anyway, I believe there is going to be a court judgement in the next few days, regarding the incompatibility of the Equality Act (which uses the term ‘sex’ in the biological sense) and the LAW regarding Gender Recognition Certificates (which is underpinned by postmodern ideology, and asserts that a person can actually morph into the opposite sex upon the issuance of a certificate). It will be interesting to see how the judgement goes.

Personally, I think the Equality Act is a great piece of legislation that already has gender reassignment as a protected characteristic, which I’m all on board with. However, sex is also a protected characteristic, and I’m not on board with the people that are trying so hard to dilute this protected characteristic.

I think the Equality Act has it right in separating sex and gender reassignment as separate protected characteristics. People that have reassigned their gender should be free from discrimination, but it is simply not possible to change your sex, and we shouldn’t have men appropriating women’s rights.

In fact, given that the Equality Act already makes discrimination against the gender reassignment protected characteristic unlawful, you would be forgiven for thinking the current court case in the High Court is less to do with alleviating discrimination, and more to do with forcing a highly contested postmodern ideology onto the populace.

This is EXACTLY what i've been saying - let's see if you get the vitriol I get for posting it.

I've said that a tiny proportion of males will use 'trans' to their advantage, nothing else. I'm in no way deriding the GENUINE Trans community - i'm deriding the fetishistic males that have infiltrated & adhered themselves to the community under the guise of 'trans' - thanks to groups like Stonewall, who have only in late June, dropped 'crossdressers' from their definition of 'trans' (crossdressing as we all know, is a paraphilia associated with sexual arousal, just like autogynephilia)

I don't feel it correct to affirm sexual fetishes in a public domain, THAT'S ALL.


The bolded bit - perfectly worded IMO.

 

[Hackbread]

I'm in no way deriding the GENUINE Trans community - i'm deriding the fetishistic males that have infiltrated & adhered themselves to the community under the guise of 'trans'

The trans community that you have said is made up of 90% male fetishists, as apparently quoted by Lynn Conway and have yet to back up this claim

 

[d34noj]

The trans community that you have said is made up of 90% male fetishists, as apparently quoted by Lynn Conway and have yet to back up this claim

I'm aware I've not had chance to look yet - I'll look soon as!

 

[b-rad]

First photo (the men on bikes?) nobody has mentioned.

2nd photo says 'no evidence it was taken at a Pride-related event' - yet there's no evidence contrary.

3rd photo says it was taken at Pride Toronto in 2023 (?!) but no evidence there's children present - yet a quick Getty Images search shows children present.

2nd photo - that's not how the burden of proof works. I could say it was taken in your garden, and unless you can provide proof otherwise then it's fact?
3rd photo - "there is no evidence that the pictured parade was marketed as family or child-friendly"

 

[d34noj]

2nd photo - that's not how the burden of proof works. I could say it was taken in your garden, and unless you can provide proof otherwise then it's fact?
3rd photo - "there is no evidence that the pictured parade was marketed as family or child-friendly"

2nd photo - There's a 'furry' and it's owner (?!) right behind the boy. Let's put 2 & 2 together.
3rd photo - The Sickkids Foundation of Toronto kicked off Pride to start the proceedings, pretty sure it's both family & child friendly.

'A spokesperson for Pride Toronto did not respond to a request for comment.' - I bet they didn't

Edit: bit weird we're arguing these photos seeing as none we're bought up in conversation by me.

 

[Kever10]

2nd photo - that's not how the burden of proof works. I could say it was taken in your garden, and unless you can provide proof otherwise then it's fact?

According to your own logic, he only has to respond saying "it's not", and that's proof that it wasn't.

I think Burden of proof can go both ways depending on the claim.

 

[Noisy noise annoys]

This is EXACTLY what i've been saying - let's see if you get the vitriol I get for posting it.

I've said that a tiny proportion of males will use 'trans' to their advantage, nothing else. I'm in no way deriding the GENUINE Trans community - i'm deriding the fetishistic males that have infiltrated & adhered themselves to the community under the guise of 'trans' - thanks to groups like Stonewall, who have only in late June, dropped 'crossdressers' from their definition of 'trans' (crossdressing as we all know, is a paraphilia associated with sexual arousal, just like autogynephilia)

I don't feel it correct to affirm sexual fetishes in a public domain, THAT'S ALL.


The bolded bit - perfectly worded IMO.

You cant stop everything because of : 'tiny proportion of males will use 'trans' to their advantage'

'I'm in no way deriding the GENUINE Trans community - i'm deriding the fetishistic males that have infiltrated & adhered themselves to the community under the guise of 'trans' : why feel the need (obsessive) to deride anyone? Just let them be

 

[Dymak]

You cant stop everything because of : 'tiny proportion of males will use 'trans' to their advantage'

'I'm in no way deriding the GENUINE Trans community - i'm deriding the fetishistic males that have infiltrated & adhered themselves to the community under the guise of 'trans' : why feel the need (obsessive) to deride anyone? Just let them be

Letting them be is one thing, and something that I support, but allowing them to appropriate women’s rights is something else altogether, and that is something that I do not support.

The demand to conflate personality and sexuality with science is unreasonable, and it’s quite frankly littered with oxymorons. You can’t have your cake and eat it!

You can’t demand trans rights and then go apeshit when someone acknowledges the fact that you are indeed transexual.

Right now, in the High Court, it is effectively being argued that a trans person with a certificate should have their protected characteristic of gender reassignment removed from them because they’re no longer trans at all, and have effectively morphed into the opposite sex.

Further, it’s also underpinning the requirements set down in the GRC (which is clearly in opposition to self-declaration).

In the world of gender recognition certification, just being effeminate is not enough, and you need a doctor to confirm that you have taken the sufficient steps that are required to erase your trans identity and morph you into a fully fledged member of the opposite sex.

Such required steps are of quite a radical nature and can include chopping your nob off and replacing it with a fake vagina, whilst being pumped full of exogenous hormones that your body is incapable of producing naturally. Only then can you remove your trans identity and morph into the opposite sex. Doesn’t this go against a large proportion of trans ideology itself?

Personality and sexuality are distinct from biological sex and should not be conflated. Biology doesn’t work that way, and neither does society imo, despite all the money that is clearly being pumped into efforts that are so desperately trying to change that.

 

[d34noj]

You cant stop everything because of : 'tiny proportion of males will use 'trans' to their advantage'

'I'm in no way deriding the GENUINE Trans community - i'm deriding the fetishistic males that have infiltrated & adhered themselves to the community under the guise of 'trans' : why feel the need (obsessive) to deride anyone? Just let them be

Stop everything? define this mate please.


Just let them use women's spaces for their narcissistic sexual gratification? Is that what you're consenting to? (please please please, say this doesn't happen)

 

[d34noj]

Such required steps are of quite a radical nature and can include chopping your nob off and replacing it with a fake vagina, whilst being pumped full of exogenous hormones that your body is incapable of producing naturally. Only then can you remove your trans identity and morph into the opposite sex. Doesn’t this go against a large proportion of trans ideology itself?

They actually fold it inside out to create a neo-vagina, unless you started HRT too early, in which case they use part of your colon. To make a penis they use skin farmed from the forearm or thigh.

As for the hormones, traditional HRT is made from pregnant horses urine, whereas the newer stuff is synthetic. Both give a massively increased risk of various cancers, with the oestrogen massively increasing risk of osteoporosis. Hormone blockers are traditionally a cancer drug and are also used to chemically castrate paedophiles - all of which cause irreversible damage, regardless of what Transgender ideologists tell you.

 

[Hackbread]

Just let them use women's spaces for their narcissistic sexual gratification? Is that what you're consenting to? (please please please, say this doesn't happen)

But they are not they are just trying to go to the toilet....

I support peoples concerns about women's spaces.

But what you specifically keep doing is using this issue to slate an entire community as perverts which is out of order.

There's a huge leap from genuine concern and what your doing.

Still unable to back up your claims of 90% of Transwomen being Fetishists

 

[d34noj]

But they are not they are just trying to go to the toilet....

I support peoples concerns about women's spaces.

But what you specifically keep doing is using this issue to slate an entire community as perverts which is out of order.

There's a huge leap from genuine concern and what your doing.

Still unable to back up your claims of 90% of Transwomen being Fetishists

Whatever you do, don't type into Google 'transwomen masturbating in womens restrooms'.

Unless that's your bag. In which case do it, there's thousands of examples. I could give you all the evidence in the world (again, Google is your friend) and you'd still claim otherwise.


As for stating an entire community as perverts, again - I'm not. I'm slating a subset, attached uninvited to a community as perverts.

 

[Hackbread]

Whatever you do, don't type into Google 'transwomen masturbating in womens restrooms'.

Unless that's your bag. In which case do it, there's thousands of examples. I could give you all the evidence in the world (again, Google is your friend) and you'd still claim otherwise.

That is honestly the most deranged reply you could come up with.

I'm here trying to just get you to back up your transphobic claims with evidence not hearsay.
Which I think labelling 90% of Transwomen as perverts/fetishists is Transphobic.

As I say discussing this matter around Gender identity and women's spaces is very different to the stuff your saying.

You drag Trans activist Lynn Conway's name through the transphobic mud to try get clout with with this also

Which I can tell you now, what you claim was never ever said by Conway who described the really crap studies on Autogynephilia as similar to Nazi propaganda

And in all this you haven't provided me any evidence to back your claims up at all. And instead are weirdly insinuating I should Google pornography

Unlike you I have done my research.

So yeah gonna put you on ignore you strange individual as your clearly not worth engaging with if that's the best you could come up with.

 

[b-rad]

2nd photo - There's a 'furry' and it's owner (?!) right behind the boy. Let's put 2 & 2 together.
3rd photo - The Sickkids Foundation of Toronto kicked off Pride to start the proceedings, pretty sure it's both family & child friendly.

'A spokesperson for Pride Toronto did not respond to a request for comment.' - I bet they didn't

Edit: bit weird we're arguing these photos seeing as none we're bought up in conversation by me.

I haven't even looked at the photos, and I'm not looking to argue where they were taken. Just pointing out that you misquoted the article and tried to use it as proof.