Honest to God! Do you know what all of those minging priests, Saville, and the absolute multitude of perverts that have their convictions reported in each and every local newspaper up and down the country every single week of the year have in common? They are all MEN!
It’s bloody ridiculous to be making reference to the multitude of abuse that has regularly and consistently been perpetrated by men for centuries, and then comparing it to the tiny newfound population of ‘trans women’ as if they are two separate cohorts. The ‘trans women’ are men ffs! They are part of the same biological cohort that the minging priests belong to!
And just like in the ‘cis-male’ population (if we must use such newfound postmodern terminology) the vast majority of men are not raging perverts that wish to nonce people up at their local swimming baths or whatever, but some of them are, and they don’t come with labels that provide indicators of their perversions. The same will apply to the trans section of the male cohort. The majority won’t be perverts, but some of them will be.
It’s this reality that is one of the main reasons why society has provided safe spaces for women for centuries. Spaces where women are legally allowed to exclude men, and this exclusion has always equally applied to the non-perverted ‘cis-male’ majority just as much as it has applied to the predatory and perverted element of male society. It’s just a basic safeguarding measure, for crying out loud.
Anyway, I believe there is going to be a court judgement in the next few days, regarding the incompatibility of the Equality Act (which uses the term ‘sex’ in the biological sense) and the LAW regarding Gender Recognition Certificates (which is underpinned by postmodern ideology, and asserts that a person can actually morph into the opposite sex upon the issuance of a certificate). It will be interesting to see how the judgement goes.
Personally, I think the Equality Act is a great piece of legislation that already has gender reassignment as a protected characteristic, which I’m all on board with. However, sex is also a protected characteristic, and I’m not on board with the people that are trying so hard to dilute this protected characteristic.
I think the Equality Act has it right in separating sex and gender reassignment as separate protected characteristics. People that have reassigned their gender should be free from discrimination, but it is simply not possible to change your sex, and we shouldn’t have men appropriating women’s rights.
In fact, given that the Equality Act already makes discrimination against the gender reassignment protected characteristic unlawful, you would be forgiven for thinking the current court case in the High Court is less to do with alleviating discrimination, and more to do with forcing a highly contested postmodern ideology onto the populace.
Sending him sexy snaps of pride marches is a wild move
www.telegraph.co.uk
