Current Affairs Gender Nonsence

Do things like Gender and Pronouns bother you?


  • Total voters
    106
Status
Not open for further replies.
And if she is wrong...?

I mean I have never seen any of the trans people I have come across appear 'aroused' to be dressed as man or woman. It seems like drivel to me

Mate, are you telling me - 2 blokes on an Internet football forum, that THE Lynn Conway, creator of the microchip as we see it today, and one of the most prominent trans activists of all time is wrong?

Autogynephilia is prevalent mate, consumption of trans porn has increased by 75% in the last 3 years (and it's not straight men watching it - meaning that's A LOT of porn), Pride marches - what used to be Gay Pride is now trans Pride, awash with public nudity, furries and sex acts in front of children.
 
Mate, are you telling me - 2 blokes on an Internet football forum, that THE Lynn Conway, creator of the microchip as we see it today, and one of the most prominent trans activists of all time is wrong?

Autogynephilia is prevalent mate, consumption of trans porn has increased by 75% in the last 3 years (and it's not straight men watching it - meaning that's A LOT of porn), Pride marches - what used to be Gay Pride is now trans Pride, awash with public nudity, furries and sex acts in front of children.
I've been to multiple prides, home and abroad. That is incorrect to suggest it is awash with public sex acts in front of children.

I have no idea where you got that from wow
 
Mate, are you telling me - 2 blokes on an Internet football forum, that THE Lynn Conway, creator of the microchip as we see it today, and one of the most prominent trans activists of all time is wrong?

Autogynephilia is prevalent mate, consumption of trans porn has increased by 75% in the last 3 years (and it's not straight men watching it - meaning that's A LOT of porn), Pride marches - what used to be Gay Pride is now trans Pride, awash with public nudity, furries and sex acts in front of children.

Not everybody who has a sexual preference for something acts upon it. So, people watching trans porn has gone up. Maybe there is more trans porn out there to watch, has this been considered. Maybe it is just innocent watching of trans porn? Maybe the people watching the trans porn aren't desperate to go out there and attack women in bathrooms? Has this been considered.

You seem a smart guy, you can't really sit there and say that because trans porn viewership has gone up that women are, in conclusion, more likely to be attacked in a bathroom? The correlation is just not there, if you have any evidence to back it up, great. However, I will remain sceptical that porn directly leads to the majority of people acting sexually aggressive in real life.
 
Not everybody who has a sexual preference for something acts upon it. So, people watching trans porn has gone up. Maybe there is more trans porn out there to watch, has this been considered. Maybe it is just innocent watching of trans porn? Maybe the people watching the trans porn aren't desperate to go out there and attack women in bathrooms? Has this been considered.

You seem a smart guy, you can't really sit there and say that because trans porn viewership has gone up that women are, in conclusion, more likely to be attacked in a bathroom? The correlation is just not there, if you have any evidence to back it up, great. However, I will remain sceptical that porn directly leads to the majority of people acting sexually aggressive in real life.
It sounds a lot like the playing video games makes you violent argument to me.
 

Sexual acts in front of kids is obviously wrong, even though it is not clear exactly what they did as there are no videos (I couldn't access 2 of them though).

I will add a bit of context though, as I said could not see any videos of the actual actions, it was just vague references. Do you think these people who complained had their kids watching Trumps rally where he simulated a blowjob on a microphone? Do you think that they let their kids watch some of the music videos that are more than raunchy? Some of the lyrics in songs by extremely popular artists that have a large fanbase have very adult themes?

It is all a bit off, however, I am not seeing the correlation of people going a bit far in a parade to them then going off and sexually attacking people. Where is the direct correlation between the 2?

You seem to be more angry/upset now with other peoples harmless sexual preferences than with the discussion point of trans women going into bathrooms and attacking women en masse.
 
Not everybody who has a sexual preference for something acts upon it. So, people watching trans porn has gone up. Maybe there is more trans porn out there to watch, has this been considered. Maybe it is just innocent watching of trans porn? Maybe the people watching the trans porn aren't desperate to go out there and attack women in bathrooms? Has this been considered.

You seem a smart guy, you can't really sit there and say that because trans porn viewership has gone up that women are, in conclusion, more likely to be attacked in a bathroom? The correlation is just not there, if you have any evidence to back it up, great. However, I will remain sceptical that porn directly leads to the majority of people acting sexually aggressive in real life.

That's not what i'm saying mate, at all.

My take on it is, if you're a straight man with a prevalent fetish - so embedded in it that you're willing to act it out in public, you've blatantly not got the willpower to resist if an opportunity presents itself.

I'm not saying that trans people are looking to attack women in bathrooms/changing rooms - i'm saying that the VAT MAJORITY of transwomen aren't actually trans. So many people fighting in the corner for LGBTQIA+ rights, when you don't actually have a clue what you're fighting for.
 
That's not what i'm saying mate, at all.

My take on it is, if you're a straight man with a prevalent fetish - so embedded in it that you're willing to act it out in public, you've blatantly not got the willpower to resist if an opportunity presents itself.

I'm not saying that trans people are looking to attack women in bathrooms/changing rooms - i'm saying that the VAT MAJORITY of transwomen aren't actually trans. So many people fighting in the corner for LGBTQIA+ rights, when you don't actually have a clue what you're fighting for.

I would get that point out about acting things out in public but it is about context. What if the acts in question here were just saucy dance moves, just like the ones you see regularly on strictly come dancing or music videos. Again, without seeing the actual videos of the parade and these specific actions it is hard to agree or disagree with you on the specific examples and whether they are over the line when it comes to sensual/sexual deviancy in public. Was it a prolonged action or was it a spur of the moment quick action that, possibly a bit drunk, people did? There just isn't enough detail here to make a judgement?

Also, the bit in bold. I guess that depends on your definition of trans and/or how far down the line they are with their realignment. I know that you may now throw a big word at me to label people but at the end of the day, there is still no correlation to sexual attacks and trans people. Which is what the main discussion was about before you went to pride and watching porn.
 
Sexual acts in front of kids is obviously wrong, even though it is not clear exactly what they did as there are no videos (I couldn't access 2 of them though).

I will add a bit of context though, as I said could not see any videos of the actual actions, it was just vague references. Do you think these people who complained had their kids watching Trumps rally where he simulated a blowjob on a microphone? Do you think that they let their kids watch some of the music videos that are more than raunchy? Some of the lyrics in songs by extremely popular artists that have a large fanbase have very adult themes?

It is all a bit off, however, I am not seeing the correlation of people going a bit far in a parade to them then going off and sexually attacking people. Where is the direct correlation between the 2?

You seem to be more angry/upset now with other peoples harmless sexual preferences than with the discussion point of trans women going into bathrooms and attacking women en masse.

I'm neither angry or upset mate - Everyone has their preferences and i'm all for that, just not in public - with the everyone telling me I must affirm it.

Think of it this way...

If a man walked up to you and said 'call me daddy, it'll turn me on' - you'd say no.
If he walked up to you and said 'call me a woman, it'll turn me on' - you'd say no.
If he said 'call me she/her, that's my pronouns (but it'll turn me on)' - you'd say yes.

That's what the fetish is. Sexual gratification from the affirmation of being female. I'm not too enthused about marching for that mate. Have a read of Blanchard's Transsexualism Typography, it's interesting.

Between 2-3 people in every 100,000 have genuine Gender Dysphoria - meaning the rest (3% of all men) are autogynephilic.
 
I can't actually I'm going to type this out, but wearing leather and enjoying getting whipped doesn't make you queer, what your opinion on 50 shades?

It just seems you are reading the headlines and not the articles.

I've attended prides and what you have said isn't true, none of it. If you haven't attended one which based on your views is almost certain to be the case. Then you shouldn't spread false information.
 
Mate, are you telling me - 2 blokes on an Internet football forum, that THE Lynn Conway, creator of the microchip as we see it today, and one of the most prominent trans activists of all time is wrong?

Autogynephilia is prevalent mate, consumption of trans porn has increased by 75% in the last 3 years (and it's not straight men watching it - meaning that's A LOT of porn), Pride marches - what used to be Gay Pride is now trans Pride, awash with public nudity, furries and sex acts in front of children.
Now we are getting to the bottom of you’re real issues here
 
That's such a cop-out.

Shall we ban all Muslims from open public spaces in case one of them decides to go on a religion fueled suicidal rampage?

Should we send every immigrant back to their country of origin in case they are a criminal?

No?

"dO yOu nOt sEe tHe RiSk" ?


As I said, using the minority to condemn the majority is oppression 101.

Here's those 2 words again, risk mitigation.

Anti-terrorism bollards get installed, 100ml limitation of liquids on planes, searching of backpacks etc. Muslims aren't banned, just screened.

As for immigrants, if they enter illegally - they're by definition a criminal. If they're legal immigrants, they go through the UKSV National Security Vetting process so we know they're not a criminal.

All of the measures taken above are because of terror attacks or crime by immigrants. Don't do any of these things, and there's the risk.
 
Here's those 2 words again, risk mitigation.

Anti-terrorism bollards get installed, 100ml limitation of liquids on planes, searching of backpacks etc. Muslims aren't banned, just screened.

As for immigrants, if they enter illegally - they're by definition a criminal. If they're legal immigrants, they go through the UKSV National Security Vetting process so we know they're not a criminal.

All of the measures taken above are because of terror attacks or crime by immigrants. Don't do any of these things, and there's the risk.
…..(I’m speechless)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top