This, in a nutshell, is what is wrong with the free speech argument and how people misconstrue what it is to have free speech.
“What I’m shocked at, is that the biggest snowflakes in Milton Keynes …can’t handle someone having a different opinion.”
He spouts hateful stuff, people have the right to turn him away because of the hateful stuff. That is showing free speech on both sides of the argument. The prick wants it only one way, I can say what I like but nobody else can have a problem with it and react in their own 'free' way.
None of his followers see any irony in that.
A snowflake, I suppose, can be described as somebody who takes offence at things. Well, he should stop taking offence at people because they are a different colour to him. Maybe then he will get his chicken wings. Again, the hypocrisy/irony will be completely lost on his brain dead followers.
Free speech comes with responsibility, if you do not use it responsibly then expect reaction from other people who do use free speech responsibly.