Yeah but how boss was Ginola for 20 minutes vs Arsenal in the rain? Very boss.
Ha! Someone else remembers!
Yeah but how boss was Ginola for 20 minutes vs Arsenal in the rain? Very boss.
No resale value, not enough left in the legs, comparably massive contract and we'd have to build a side around him for him to be any use at all.
I sort of see what Chang Elephant means because he offers very little other than his poachers instinct. In quite a few games you can go 90 minutes and not realise he was playing. There's wouldn't be that much difference between bringing Lampard in and bringing Cahill back for that reason (except obviously Lampard is the better player).
I wouldn't like to see us go for him as it would be a "headline" signing that would disguise any proper signings we could make instead - or disguise big sales. Another Gazza or Ginola, albeit a higher quality one.
He'd fit straight into our midfield & if the only time I noticed his presence was when he hit the back of the net with his 1 in 3 average, I'll take it. (not that I agree with that btw)
Great at clubs where's he's allowed a free role to do **** all other than shoot at goal, carried by the other players. Would be extra bad here, Neville and Osman don't even do enough to justify their own selection.
Great at clubs where's he's allowed a free role to do **** all other than shoot at goal, carried by the other players. Would be extra bad here, Neville and Osman don't even do enough to justify their own selection.
Off-topic I know but who's been the better player Stevie Starfish or Fat Frank?
On the subject I'm sure I read he was joining LA Galaxy.
Off-topic I know but who's been the better player Stevie Starfish or Fat Frank?
On the subject I'm sure I read he was joining LA Galaxy.