We can question him if he actually signs him.
As of now his record has been pretty spot on (questions over Mina so far I suppose).
Nothing wrong with questioning him sure, also nothing wrong with showing a bit of faith as his record so far means he deserves a bit of it for me.
It's not like Delph is a shockingly bad player or anything.
People questioning him shouldn't be attacked for it and simply saying "If it's good enough for Brands, then it's good enough for me" shouldn't be a debate ender
That's what my post was addressing, because some people have an almost cult like worship of Brands currently and it's not healthy
I don't even hate Delph, but there's nothing wrong with people questioning him as a possible acquisition
Again, the same arguments being used to have a go at people questioning the possible signing of Delph were given for Martina also, and every other signing who looked like he'd be meh out of the gate and ended up being meh
Granted the same arguments were made for Barry and he ended up being good, but by and large meh seeming signings do often appear to be meh
This isn't a player from a foreign league that nobody has seen. It's not difficult to have an educated guess on whether Delph would make us better
I don't think he's a terrible player or anything, but any serious amount of money and wages on him would have to be questioned at this stage considering the fact that midfield isn't a massive issue for us currently and I don't think he's an automatic starter for us
Last edited:









