Pretty good race that! Crazy first couple of laps, then a great finish. Can't believe Hamilton pulled off the win. Still think RB/Ver might be favourites, but it's gonna be hard for them if Lewis can keep doing that. Perez could be a real difference maker if they can avoid making mistakes in Q2! And good to see Merc making good strategy calls. They've been dubious on that kind of thing in the past, but not really had any pressure the last couple years, so it will be interesting to see how that pans out this season.
Also thought Sainz did well in the second Ferrari, and Lando smashed it again. I really rate him and Russell. Hopefully they can get in competitive cars sooner rather than later and give Max (and LeClerc) some new British rivals to worry about!!
I'm not even going to pretend to know the answers to my question, but I do feel something has to be done to help amend the current imbalance.
While I don't want all the cars to be carbon-copies (e.g. same specification), perhaps highly-standardised engines or power trains could be a measure.
If 70-85% of the parts are from the same source or standardised design, you'd only be allowing teams to squeeze out higher performance in the other parts.
The big teams could probably generate more power, but it wouldn't be a massive difference; teams would have to focus on aerodynamics and other parts.
Would that, however, be something the big teams would go for because Mercedes and Ferrari like the prestige and it's also a small part of their wider R&D?
Look at Russell: he's squeezing everything out of a Williams car and is still often near the back, yet one drive in a Mercedes and he's right at the front.
It would be nice for drivers to not be so heavily shackled by their car or, like Bottas, be helped so much to the point it covers their ineptitude.
I'm not advocating an absolutely level playing field; rather, I simply want it to be a closer race overall: more challenge at the front, middle and at the back.
I like the sprint race format tbh, it works well in lots of other series and having the grid reversed in some way would definitely make F1 consistently more entertaining. There would still be qualifying as well as the main feature race... we lose 1 (maybe 2) practice sessions and gain an extra race. I hope they try it out at Silverstone as rumoured, cant go any worse than that time they pointlessly changed the quali format in 2016
Id say there are more wrecks primarily because of the reverse grid format they use and also because the cars are much more racey than F1 cars due to the decreased downforce and ability to stay in dirty air without their tyres getting murdered, this means everyone is in closer proximity for longer periods of time. The standard of drivers is admittedly lower though which also adds to the wrecks.
Think the changes next year will make a decent job of fixing some of that next year, but you can't go too far with those kind of changes. Make too much of the car standardised and it loses what makes it F1 in the first place - it's about the teams and the drivers, not just the drivers. If you do change too much you risk losing teams like Mercedes, maybe Renault/Alpine.
If he hadn't been in the Mercedes for the past few seasons, he'd be mid-grid or less. Mercedes have liked him because he's a quiet yes-man.
After the Rosberg/Hamilton years you can't really blame them. Up until now it has worked perfectly for them. Think you may have seen them get someone else in if another team had been able to consistently push them for WCC/WDCs.
Think that goes back to the conversation earlier in the week about whether Vettel was in that top bracket of drivers. Its that ability to perform beyond the cars estimated capabilities.
Another ludicrous blunder from Vettel today, ramming into Ocon. No sign since his switch to AM that he's any closer to rediscovering the sort of form that once made him so formidable. He's almost a Grosjeanesque liability at this point.
Bit harsh on Vettel that, Grosjean was / is his own level of dangerous stupidity. Although it looks like Mazepin fancies a crack at that title and the signs are looking good.
As for Vettel, i just think Ferrari has broken him. Doesn't look bothered by any of it now. Maybe he thought going to the Merc B team might be fun but the regulation changes seem to have put paid to that.
Yeah, bad mistake from Vettel, and one he's made a number of times the last couple of years. But up until then I thought he'd done a good job, especially holding Alonso up and giving Stroll the chance to pull away. Had a good little battle there, and some better wheel to wheel fighting than he's shown in the past.
You have the Hamilton's, Schumachers etc. In a class of their own.
Vettel is a long way behind that, in the Mansell sort of class.
Then you have the likes of Rosberg as the almost fluke winners.
I think Mansell and Rosberg might be better tbh. If that had been nearly any other driver than Lewis alongside Rosberg he might have 2/3 WDCs, and iirc Mansell was unlucky not to win more of them as well. Vettel was extremely lucky to get his 4 imo.