Exactly.
F1 isn't far off FIFA for underhand nonsense and leadership being available for a bung.
Classic example. Ferrari "not guilty" but result of investigation remains sealed, and the red car lost a load of pace immediately.
Yeah, not guilty.
Bext seasons rule changes (and this seasons token system) may help level the field, but It won't be enough.
I'm not even going to pretend to know the answers to my question, but I do feel something has to be done to help amend the current imbalance.
While I don't want all the cars to be carbon-copies (e.g. same specification), perhaps highly-standardised engines or power trains could be a measure.
If 70-85% of the parts are from the same source or standardised design, you'd only be allowing teams to squeeze out higher performance in the other parts.
The big teams could probably generate more power, but it wouldn't be a massive difference; teams would have to focus on aerodynamics and other parts.
Would that, however, be something the big teams would go for because Mercedes and Ferrari like the prestige and it's also a small part of their wider R&D?
Look at Russell: he's squeezing everything out of a Williams car and is still often near the back, yet one drive in a Mercedes and he's right at the front.
It would be nice for drivers to not be so heavily shackled by their car or, like Bottas, be helped so much to the point it covers their ineptitude.
I'm not advocating an absolutely level playing field; rather, I simply want it to be a closer race overall: more challenge at the front, middle and at the back.