noharmdone
Requested to be banned
I've had more satisfying wins obviously but 700 return from a 100 stake can't be dismissed lightly
Ok mate xx
I've had more satisfying wins obviously but 700 return from a 100 stake can't be dismissed lightly
I've had more satisfying wins obviously but 700 return from a 100 stake can't be dismissed lightly
I'll take this back if someone posts stats to prove me wrong, but I bet about 22 of those shots were from outside the box and more than half the corners failed to beat the first man.
We were woeful in the final third today (watched on internet), lacking anyone who could take a man on and beat him and also lacking anyone who could thread a killer pass through to Lukaku. It was painful watching Lukaku drift out to the right wing in order to get the ball - he is supposed to be tucking away chances created by others for him, but we just take potshots from outside the box instead.
Back four and Robles were good today, everyone else was meh. Badly need a top CM and a decent winger in January, as clearly demonstrated by the total absence of quality depth in those positions today.
fair play to you . but what the fuk r you doing following everton football club
I hope you enjoy your winnings
To be a successful punter you need to seperate your head from your heart
Was a bit tough to thread a through ball to a lone striker with 10 Sunderland players squeezing the space.
City would struggle to score through that the way you've mentioned. How many times have you just seen a side be restricted to shots outside the box?
To me, when we went down to 10 men, it was a key attack. Ross has a wicked shot on him and if you cant break a team down, you should use it, and gamble on a bounce, a deflection, a save off the keeper. It almost paid off, not forgetting the amount of corners we had.
Top play makers split those types of defences down. £20mill+ ones.
It was either that or lump it to Fellaini....oh wait.
Why's loads of you having a go at Sunderland? They've done [Poor language removed] all wrong like.
Decent set of fans out of a sea of belters in England. They'll be buzzing and rightly so, if I'd seen how cocky our fans were of the victory before then I'd be doubly buzzing.
Everton aren't we?
Was a bit tough to thread a through ball to a lone striker with 10 Sunderland players squeezing the space.
City would struggle to score through that the way you've mentioned. How many times have you just seen a side be restricted to shots outside the box?
To me, when we went down to 10 men, it was a key attack. Ross has a wicked shot on him and if you cant break a team down, you should use it, and gamble on a bounce, a deflection, a save off the keeper. It almost paid off, not forgetting the amount of corners we had.
Top play makers split those types of defences down. £20mill+ ones.
It was either that or lump it to Fellaini....oh wait.
They sang the 'Feed the scousers' song.
They're belters.
It looks like 2 shots inside the box that were saved. 4 shots inside the box that went wide. And 3 shots inside the box that were blocked.
http://www.fourfourtwo.com/statszon...4/team-stats/11/0_SHOT_01#tabs-wrapper-anchor
I still think that our major issues are lack of movement and not getting enough men up and down the pitch quickly enough.
If we're going to remain static and not commit enough men into the box it's going to be very difficult to move defenders around and create space for ourselves.
If you can post a screen shot of this bet.. I will donate £10 to Alder Hey.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.