Carlo wasn't backed sufficently - anyone who claims that is foolish.
We needed about 6-7 signings when you look at the dross in our squad and we did the usual go with what we've got.
The owners have chucked a lot of money at it over the years but its been wasted so you either keep spending or call it a day like Randy Lerner did and accept midtable instead of appointing Ancelotti on massive wages & signing 29 yr olds in a quest for instant success which cant be achieved as 1 injury leads us to the likes of Tosun, Kenny, Delph, Siggurdsson getting on the pitch who are Fizzy Pop Level standard.
We even let 2x attacking players leave and not even replace one of them!
Love the way you just ignore the 140m in losses and suggest we should have signed more players.
You are utterly relentless arent you? Nothing you say is even close to being a reality.
Personally I think we should have bought Mbappe, made a move for Big Bobby L at Bayern and made a move for the ginger lad at City.
Carlo wanted Allan and Hamez, we got that done, every manager we have had has been backed to the hilt. Recruitment, for various reasons hasn't worked out.
Nobody will claim we have spent the 500m wisely, but to suggest Carlo wasn't backed is quite silly.
We clearly have different versions of backing, you wanted 6 or 7 players, we signed 6, for the record.
You spent all last year telling everybody that Kean wasn't a footballer and I doubt you ever had a good thing to say about Walcott, but suddenly they fit an agenda. We have a bloated squad and massive loses, its sadly a process, 1 that we have so far failed in. But hey ho, we go again and again.
lol
