Surely it was aboutgetting wages off the books not about getting big fees for them? Or I thought it was??
Getting wages down was the consolation prize. We don't want those players and so a good result was selling them. Nextvsummer will be even harder to get cash for them.
Here's a thought maybe no one wanted to buy them players he never signed because there rubbish so you moan because there out on loan and I would bet my last pound you would moan if they were still at the club not playing
Are you acquainted with the transfer market of this decade? It's where any old tat gets a price of about £20M slapped on it minimum.
If that is true, then why didn't Silva spend £40m on a striker?
Why cant he have both?
Maybe will will have both by next season. However,If you identified our urgent need of a striker, then surely the manager should see it.
The process is that Silva identifies the player, Brands signs them. I think we can see by the way the season has gone so far that Silva wouldn't have been shy at letting Brands know we were short there in attack.
You told us all summer we had no money unless we sold one of our big players.
Sorry, where did I say it'd cost masses of money to get a striker in? Dont we do loan deals too? I think we do, dont we?
