Current Affairs EU In or Out

In or Out

  • In

    Votes: 688 67.9%

  • Out

    Votes: 325 32.1%
  • Total voters
    1,013
Status
Not open for further replies.
Foot Long Hot Dog said:
Someone needs to call them out on this absolute flannel that sharing their actual plan is somehow going to undermine the future negotiations.

As if what we will be seeking achieve is going to be some massive surprise when we get to Brussels.

"Do you want to retain full access to the single market then Mr Davis?"

"That would be telling, we're playing that one close to our chests"

"So yes then"

"You got me there Junker lad, was it that obvious?"
Click to expand...

its hilarious they are using this as an excuse, i think they gambling on the public being stupid enough to accept it
 
neil999 said:
my main worry is davis and more so fox leading these negotiations....
Click to expand...

They won't. A position will be agreed, Davis and co will be given a script, a senior Civil Servant will effectively lead and Davis will do the niceties at the beginning and end of each meting he attends. He will not attend all of the meetings which will be innumerable and wide ranging, these will be led by suitable experts and senior Civil Servants.....Ronald Reagan didn't really run America.......
 
peteblue said:
They won't. A position will be agreed, Davis and co will be given a script, a senior Civil Servant will effectively lead and Davis will do the niceties at the beginning and end of each meting he attends. He will not attend all of the meetings which will be innumerable and wide ranging, these will be led by suitable experts and senior Civil Servants.....Ronald Reagan didn't really run America.......
Click to expand...
WAT?! who came with star wars then?!
 
peteblue said:
So then why do the MP's want to know, because 'the What' will almost certainly be that obvious. What will not be so obvious is the 'Why' and the 'How' and that'll be the bit that they will not wish to reveal......
Click to expand...

Let's be right, they'll want May & Co to go back on the bluster spouted at the Tory conference, where she basically said they'd be putting border control ahead of the economy.

They haven't got a clue what the 'why' and the 'how' is Pete, they can't even agree amongst themselves on what the 'red lines' should be.

The whole thing is a complete shambles.
 
Foot Long Hot Dog said:
Let's be right, they'll want May & Co to go back on the bluster spouted at the Tory conference, where she basically said they'd be putting border control ahead of the economy.

They haven't got a clue what the 'why' and the 'how' is Pete, they can't even agree amongst themselves on what the 'red lines' should be.

The whole thing is a complete shambles.
Click to expand...

Talking of Shambles.....

SCOTLAND should get a special Brexit deal, Sir Keir Starmer, Labour’s shadow Brexit secretary, has said as he made clear his party would not vote against Article 50, which triggers the start of Britain's two-year divorce from Brussels.

Appearing on the BBC’s Victoria Derbyshire programme, Sir Keir said Labour wanted the UK to have the “best possible access to the single market, it should be in the customs union and there should be special arrangements for Northern Ireland, Wales and Scotland”.

The Labour frontbencher did not elaborate on his comments but they come as Scottish Labour explores a federalist solution to Brexit that would allow Scotland to remain part of the European Union while staying part of the United Kingdom.
 
peteblue said:
Talking of Shambles.....

SCOTLAND should get a special Brexit deal, Sir Keir Starmer, Labour’s shadow Brexit secretary, has said as he made clear his party would not vote against Article 50, which triggers the start of Britain's two-year divorce from Brussels.

Appearing on the BBC’s Victoria Derbyshire programme, Sir Keir said Labour wanted the UK to have the “best possible access to the single market, it should be in the customs union and there should be special arrangements for Northern Ireland, Wales and Scotland”.

The Labour frontbencher did not elaborate on his comments but they come as Scottish Labour explores a federalist solution to Brexit that would allow Scotland to remain part of the European Union while staying part of the United Kingdom.
Click to expand...
Jocks can stay in the EU , who is bothered, but they can't have there cake and eat it English pound and Euro propping them up they can f off.
 
edge said:
Jocks can stay in the EU , who is bothered, but they can't have there cake and eat it English pound and Euro propping them up they can f off.
Click to expand...

I think what you're trying to say is they shouldn't be allowed to have the English (EngNorIreWelsh?) Pound propping them up should they leave? But if you actually did leave, the value of the Pound will collapse - far more so than it already has - so it would be dragging them down instead. And then they could switch to the Euro and prop you up with discounted cross-border shopping. So, problem solved!
 
Pienaar's gloves said:
Okay mate, ask @Toffeelover who used the word.

I didn't call you a moron.

Oh I think he's deleted it, so don't worry about it.
Click to expand...
Fair enough I just thought it was you sorted Toffelover is fine by me he did not call me a moron he implied you did as you have not no problem implying that that's up to you!
Pienaar's gloves said:
I'm not making judgements on the persons, but there have been some unintelligent points made, definitely.
Click to expand...
yes I agree mainly from you, have you watched today's DP as yet or do you just know everything?
It's ok to have a point of view , and argue your case on this forum without ridicule in debate?
I don't mind even if it's in jest, but when another poster like toffelover indicted your classing me as a moron do you think that's clever?
I accept your explanation, but as a mod stated let's not get too personal disagree with me by all means in a decent way ok!
 
peteblue said:
So then why do the MP's want to know, because 'the What' will almost certainly be that obvious. What will not be so obvious is the 'Why' and the 'How' and that'll be the bit that they will not wish to reveal......
Click to expand...

peteblue said:
They won't. A position will be agreed, Davis and co will be given a script, a senior Civil Servant will effectively lead and Davis will do the niceties at the beginning and end of each meting he attends. He will not attend all of the meetings which will be innumerable and wide ranging, these will be led by suitable experts and senior Civil Servants.....Ronald Reagan didn't really run America.......
Click to expand...
Reveal what.. They haven't a clue
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

→ Log in 🔑 Register
🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top