Current Affairs EU In or Out

In or Out

  • In

    Votes: 688 67.9%
  • Out

    Votes: 325 32.1%

  • Total voters
    1,013
Status
Not open for further replies.
Ireland’s prime minister has warned that Brexit negotiations between Britain and the rest of the European Union could turn vicious.

Enda Kenny also predicted that Theresa May might respond to pressure from within the Tory party and trigger article 50 to eject the UK from the EU before next spring.

Kenny told an audience of politicians, business leaders, trade unionists and community organisations in Dublin on Wednesday that May has agreed with him that there would be “no return to the borders of the past” after Brexit.

Speaking at an all-island conference on Brexit’s impact on Ireland, north and south, Kenny said he had an assurance from the British prime minister that there would be “no hard border” between the Irish Republic and Northern Ireland, and that the retention of an open border was a critical element of negotiations.

On the subject of hostility towards the UK, he said: “The other side of this argument may well get quite vicious after a while, because there are those around the European table who take a very poor view of the fact that Britain decided to leave.”

Irish PM warns talks between Britain and EU could get vicious

So who exactly are 'those around Europe' with a very poor view? And view of what and whom? Do they think the politicians should have controlled it's lessers more strictly?

Unless there is a reconciliation in approach, that sort of patronising talk will be seen as inflammatory and vicious it will certainly get.
 
https://www.ft.com/content/bfe51444-9f70-11e6-86d5-4e36b35c3550

"Britain’s service sector will see its exports drop up to 60 per cent after leaving the European single market, even with a free-trade agreement with the EU in place, according to research from a leading think-tank.

A new study from the National Institute of Economic and Social Research, to be published on Wednesday, says that signing a free-trade agreement with the EU will not recoup any loss in services exports, but would reduce the long-term fall in goods exports from between 58-65 per cent to between 35-44 per cent.

Advocates of the UK leaving the single market say that signing FTAs would enable British exporters to access markets in the EU and the rest of the world.

The study was based on the average FTA in existence in rich economies and big emerging markets, while Theresa May, the prime minister, has said Britain is aiming for a unique deal with the EU.

In theory, the falls in exports could be reduced if Britain managed to sign a deep bilateral agreement with the EU, including good coverage of the services sector. But Monique Ebell, the author of the report, said: “The average FTA for services at the moment is not very comprehensive and tends not to do very much.”

In 2014, 40 per cent of Britain’s services trade, and 56 per cent of its goods trade, was with other European Economic Area members, meaning that the overall fall in British exports would be 24 per cent for services and 20-25 per cent for goods.

Britain’s post-Brexit trade arrangements have come sharply into focus over the past few days after the government scrambled to reassure Nissan, which manufactures cars in Sunderland, that its ability to export to Europe would not be affected by leaving the EU.

The battle for London’s business

Most EU cities are a long way from joining the club of top-ranking financial centres

One solution would be to sign an FTA with the EU that pegged import tariffs at zero and aimed to expedite customs and regulatory procedures that add to the costs of cross-border trade.

Ms Ebell said more research was needed to assess which of the many aspects of the single market — including freedom of movement for capital and labour, harmonised regulation and rules against state aid — were instrumental in creating so much trade between EEA economies.

“We need to understand very quickly in a deep way what will matter in an FTA,” she said. “An off-the-shelf agreement based on current practice is not going to be much use.”

Economists have focused on “passporting” — the right for financial services companies to operate throughout the EU under UK supervision — as one issue likely to affect Britain in particular. But services FTAs tend to have weak coverage for financial services, falling well short of the automatic market access afforded by passporting.

The British government has yet definitively to announce whether it wants to remain a member of the single market and the customs union, which sets a common external goods tariff and would sharply constrain Britain’s ability to sign FTAs with non-EU countries.

As well as financial services and car manufacturing, business representatives from a number of industries including the technology sector and pharmaceuticals have argued for deals to protect their ability to trade with the EU."

Fine Bruce. Now do an article from the EU standpoint. Stop all this doom talk on our side. How will it be for the EU, the way you put it, it is only the UK that will suffer and the EU "will be laughing all the way to the bank"!
 
Ireland’s prime minister has warned that Brexit negotiations between Britain and the rest of the European Union could turn vicious.

Enda Kenny also predicted that Theresa May might respond to pressure from within the Tory party and trigger article 50 to eject the UK from the EU before next spring.

Kenny told an audience of politicians, business leaders, trade unionists and community organisations in Dublin on Wednesday that May has agreed with him that there would be “no return to the borders of the past” after Brexit.

Speaking at an all-island conference on Brexit’s impact on Ireland, north and south, Kenny said he had an assurance from the British prime minister that there would be “no hard border” between the Irish Republic and Northern Ireland, and that the retention of an open border was a critical element of negotiations.

On the subject of hostility towards the UK, he said: “The other side of this argument may well get quite vicious after a while, because there are those around the European table who take a very poor view of the fact that Britain decided to leave.”

Irish PM warns talks between Britain and EU could get vicious

They feel to be affronted because some one has dared to leave their cosy little club and is going to stop filling their coffers thus causing financial difficulties.
 
Fine Bruce. Now do an article from the EU standpoint. Stop all this doom talk on our side. How will it be for the EU, the way you put it, it is only the UK that will suffer and the EU "will be laughing all the way to the bank"!

Believe it or not, I don't go out of my way to find this stuff, it's just respected sources that post opinions on Brexit, so I share them on here.
 
Openly admitted he wasn't 100% behind it in the campaign.
He wasn't behind it at all much before the campaign, and was an actual activist against it along with Anthony Wedgewood-Benn, if memory serves me correctly. Which, unfortunately, it doesn't always do these days.
Feel free to correct me if I'm having a C.R.A.F.T. moment.
But a serious question if i may, why did he claim not to be totally behind it when rallying for 'remain'. Surely that is sending out conflicting views on what was such a serious matter. That could not have helped the cause in any shape or form.
 
He wasn't behind it at all much before the campaign, and was an actual activist against it along with Anthony Wedgewood-Benn, if memory serves me correctly. Which, unfortunately, it doesn't always do these days.
Feel free to correct me if I'm having a C.R.A.F.T. moment.
But a serious question if i may, why did he claim not to be totally behind it when rallying for 'remain'. Surely that is sending out conflicting views on what was such a serious matter. That could not have helped the cause in any shape or form.

He was being honest.

He was a eurosceptic who looked at the EU and weighed up that on balance, we were better off in.

He didn't pretend to love it.

Much like myself!
 
He was being honest.

He was a eurosceptic who looked at the EU and weighed up that on balance, we were better off in.

He didn't pretend to love it.

Much like myself!
Ah, that explains it. Thanks.
But I think he would have been better using that as part of his platform. You know, looking at it from both perspectives and concluding that 'remain' was better. And give his reasons.
Forgive me if he did, but I spend irregular periods of time out of communication and would probably have missed it.
 
Hard Brexit would mean patients waiting years for new drugs

A hard Brexit would lead to the loss of scientific funding for the UK drug industry and would mean patients waiting much longer for life-changing medicines, a thinktank has warned.

The report by the Public Policy Projects notes that patients, taxpayers and drugmakers benefit from a shared clinical trials and drug approvals process between the UK and the EU. This would be lost under a hard Brexit, which could mean years of delays before vital new drugs come on to the UK market – and £144bn of lost sales for the UK life sciences industry by 2020. A hard Brexit would mean the UK having no access to the single market.

Stephen Dorrell, a former Tory health secretary who heads the thinktank, said the government must be equally focused on Brexit’s implications for the pharmaceutical and biotech industries as it was on banking and the car industry. Life sciences contribute £60bn a year to the UK economy and employ 220,000 people.
 
Ireland’s prime minister has warned that Brexit negotiations between Britain and the rest of the European Union could turn vicious.

Enda Kenny also predicted that Theresa May might respond to pressure from within the Tory party and trigger article 50 to eject the UK from the EU before next spring.

Kenny told an audience of politicians, business leaders, trade unionists and community organisations in Dublin on Wednesday that May has agreed with him that there would be “no return to the borders of the past” after Brexit.

Speaking at an all-island conference on Brexit’s impact on Ireland, north and south, Kenny said he had an assurance from the British prime minister that there would be “no hard border” between the Irish Republic and Northern Ireland, and that the retention of an open border was a critical element of negotiations.

On the subject of hostility towards the UK, he said: “The other side of this argument may well get quite vicious after a while, because there are those around the European table who take a very poor view of the fact that Britain decided to leave.”

Irish PM warns talks between Britain and EU could get vicious
Dont remember them being vicious when we bailed them out with a loan they have still yet to pay back in 2022
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top