Current Affairs EU In or Out

In or Out

  • In

    Votes: 688 67.9%
  • Out

    Votes: 325 32.1%

  • Total voters
    1,013
Status
Not open for further replies.
Yawn... It was an equivalent figure, relating to the weekly gross payment to the EU being equivalent to the cost of a new hospital. Nothing more, nothing less...
Yeah but the insinuation was that it was all going to be spent on the NHS. You know that wasn't true. I knew it wasn't true. One of the heath ministers at the time even resigned over it.

It was a crass headline that undermined a lot of what Brexit stood for to many of the ordinary people who voted for it. Let's just accept it for what it was.
 
Yeah but the insinuation was that it was all going to be spent on the NHS. You know that wasn't true. I knew it wasn't true. One of the heath ministers at the time even resigned over it.

It was a crass headline that undermined a lot of what Brexit stood for to many of the ordinary people who voted for it. Let's just accept it for what it was.

As I have posted before, neither campaign had ANY executive power to spend a single penny from Treasury funds. Hence it was an equivalent.

Jeez, it's not hard to understand, and it wasn't at the time!!!
 
That's OK then...isn't it?
So what is it being spent on?
Just looking for positives..
What do you want me to say?. I'm just acknowledging that the bus advertisement wasn't factual. The truth is that the money we save in not contributing to the EU, approximately £14bn pa, will go into the pot. Had we still been in the EU it probably would have been closer to £25bn pa but best not go there. There's no way of knowing what that £14bn would be spent on as that's not how our treasury works, but some of it would have been spent on replacing some of the benefits we previously received from the EU, such as CAP and development funding.

Since 2016 a lot more than £350m per week extra has been sent on our NHS. But that is down to years of austerity and nothing to do with Brexit.
 
As I have posted before, neither campaign had ANY executive power to spend a single penny from Treasury funds. Hence it was an equivalent.

Jeez, it's not hard to understand, and it wasn't at the time!!!
Not arguing with any of that. Just saying that it was crass and disingenuous and left the Leave campaign open to the sort of criticism it's getting today, four and a half years on.

The people I know who voted Leave would have taken that for what it was, but if they hadn't done it we wouldn't be having this discussion now.
 
As I have posted before, neither campaign had ANY executive power to spend a single penny from Treasury funds. Hence it was an equivalent.

Jeez, it's not hard to understand, and it wasn't at the time!!!
Apparently it was, because Leavers believed it was 350m going to the NHS instead.
 
So it was just a blatant lie.
However it did con millions and millions of people.
Shock horror. Politicians lying, being economical with the truth. I fully believed that the city of London would collapse within weeks of a leave vote. The British economy would collapse within days of a leave vote. That Cameron won concessions from the EU. That the SNP would respect the NO vote for independence
Liars on both sides!,,
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top