Current Affairs EU In or Out

In or Out

  • In

    Votes: 688 67.9%
  • Out

    Votes: 325 32.1%

  • Total voters
    1,013
Status
Not open for further replies.
Depends on the Company articles and the types of shares owned, but I can’t ever remember something like this happening before, but I’m sure one of our city or banking type posters will know. It’ll be interesting though.....

Pretty sure Company articles regarding share issues are not mandated by a company; not if they want to be on any stock exchange. It does seem very strange. Maybe they can do it, but its very rarely done. After all, the shareholders are the owners when alls said and done.
 
Pretty sure Company articles regarding share issues are not mandated by a company; not if they want to be on any stock exchange. It does seem very strange. Maybe they can do it, but its very rarely done. After all, the shareholders are the owners when alls said and done.

The company articles normally have sections on share ownership and rights etc. Of course a company can change its articles, but it normally needs 75% of the shareholders to approve the change. Anyway, one for the lawyers .....
 
So it looks like the EU 27 have now signed this off and that Boris has more than enough MP’s on side to pass it in the HoC, with just the professional grievance parties against....
 

References to decades-old computer software are included in the new Brexit agreement, including a description of Netscape Communicator and Mozilla Mail as being "modern" services.
Experts believe officials must have copied and pasted chunks of text from old legislation into the document.
The references are on page 921 of the trade deal, in a section on encryption technology.
It also recommends using systems that are now vulnerable to cyber-attacks.



Oven ready cookies no doubt....
 
He's inauthentic. That is toxic for any politician. He cant both keep the Remainerds and take back the racist proles 'oop north' in the former mill and mining towns.
Not sure it matters to be honest, all that matters is Brexit, its has been delivered its Johnson gig, and now Johnson and his Conservative Party who govern will have to deliver the tangible economic benefits of the Brexit project within the 3 years, well paid jobs with housing and huge investment infrastructure, 'oop north' . The government will scurry round Sovereignty, means jack to peoples day to day lives....

In essence Starmer just needs to go along with it... It will be similar to the Iraq War, no-one cares or remembers the Conservative opposition ejaculating over Blair going to war, Blair owns Iraq as will Johnson own Brexit.

Personally as leader he and his cabinet need to vote for it put aside fact and principle make something of the embers. Although I would allow the Labour free vote, between them and their constituents!
 

References to decades-old computer software are included in the new Brexit agreement, including a description of Netscape Communicator and Mozilla Mail as being "modern" services.
Experts believe officials must have copied and pasted chunks of text from old legislation into the document.
The references are on page 921 of the trade deal, in a section on encryption technology.
It also recommends using systems that are now vulnerable to cyber-attacks.



Oven ready cookies no doubt....

have you even surfed the web unless you've used Netscape?
 
Not sure it matters to be honest, all that matters is Brexit, its has been delivered its Johnson gig, and now Johnson and his Conservative Party who govern will have to deliver the tangible economic benefits of the Brexit project within the 3 years, well paid jobs with housing and huge investment infrastructure, 'oop north' . The government will scurry round Sovereignty, means jack to peoples day to day lives....

In essence Starmer just needs to go along with it... It will be similar to the Iraq War, no-one cares or remembers the Conservative opposition ejaculating over Blair going to war, Blair owns Iraq as will Johnson own Brexit.

Personally as leader he and his cabinet need to vote for it put aside fact and principle make something of the embers. Although I would allow the Labour free vote, between them and their constituents!
The LP didn't lose in 2010 because of Iraq. It lost because the LP claimed part ownership of the world wide economic slump.

If the LP go along with the deal then they lose a lot of voters who were passionate and still are about opposing a Tory deal, and they dont garner any more support with the sort of divvies who voted Brexit/Tory anyway.
 
The LP didn't lose in 2010 because of Iraq. It lost because the LP claimed part ownership of the world wide economic slump.

If the LP go along with the deal then they lose a lot of voters who were passionate and still are about opposing a Tory deal, and they dont garner any more support with the sort of divvies who voted Brexit/Tory anyway.

TBF I don't think they do, providing Starmer clearly explains why he is voting for it.
 
The LP didn't lose in 2010 because of Iraq. It lost because the LP claimed part ownership of the world wide economic slump.

If the LP go along with the deal then they lose a lot of voters who were passionate and still are about opposing a Tory deal, and they dont garner any more support with the sort of divvies who voted Brexit/Tory anyway.
Its a Tory Government deal.

We are in the realms of legacy, Blair is haunted by Iraq, Brown by World crash and in the incident where he rightly called out that nasty old bigot. Johnson will be judged on Brexit and the tangible benefits.
 
Labour should abstain. True, its better than no deal. But it's not better than remaining and arguably its worse than a Labour (Norway style?) deal. All he has to do is explain that. When it goes tits up the tories will play the blame game as per. Labour shouldn't put their name to it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top