Current Affairs EU In or Out

In or Out

  • In

    Votes: 688 67.9%
  • Out

    Votes: 325 32.1%

  • Total voters
    1,013
Status
Not open for further replies.
You are confusing his history with his results as PM. Thus far, and yes, it's early days, they are good.
Laughable response lad. If we ignore a politician's past record then you may as well appoint Chris Grayling as PM. The only reason you think he is doing well is that they are keeping him away from details in the EU matter, and they are instead making him mouth Cummings' platitudes, ie "anti democratic backstop", "our European friends and partners", "our American friends and partners" etc etc
 
Laughable response lad. If we ignore a politician's past record then you may as well appoint Chris Grayling as PM. The only reason you think he is doing well is that they are keeping him away from details in the EU matter, and they are instead making him mouth Cummings' platitudes, ie "anti democratic backstop", "our European friends and partners", "our American friends and partners" etc etc

Well, it's working, isn't it!
 
He absolutely is - take that image "that was sent to him a few days ago", as opposed to him reading about it on one of the usual far right sites.

Deflection again.

The fact of the matter is that Westminster has decided that such a sign is now necessary where, previously, it was not.

Why do you think that might be?
 
Deflection again.

The fact of the matter is that Westminster has decided that such a sign is now necessary where, previously, it was not.

Why do you think that might be?
maybe because like any good patriot, you've decided to desert the UK and spend your earnings in some other country.
Face it mate, you've a very tentative connection to the UK now and all this garbage you're spouting won't ease your guilt or change any outcome.

If you really feel the way you do, maybe you should move back to the UK, contribute to the exchequer and do your bit.
Not much of a patriot are you really?!
 
Deflection again.

The fact of the matter is that Westminster has decided that such a sign is now necessary where, previously, it was not.

Why do you think that might be?

It is not deflection to point out where that image ultimately comes from, and how do you know it was not necessary beforehand when you do not live here?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top