Current Affairs EU In or Out

In or Out

  • In

    Votes: 688 67.9%
  • Out

    Votes: 325 32.1%

  • Total voters
    1,013
Status
Not open for further replies.
Fair enough. Point remains, that IF they all agree, then the default position is unlikely to be No Deal? Or more unlikely than if they didnt agree anyrate.
I think we are heading for a no deal, esp if Italy veto us asking for any sort of extention ..
 
I don't know why anyone should be bothered about the Brexit outcome -- the EU will implode within the next decade anway.
As an economic venture it was fine. But it has long since become a political mission, ever since it began to court and then accept membership of those countries where living standards and wage levels were so different from those of the leading states. At this juncture the willingness of its leading voices and decision-makers to forego some continued economic progress in favour of expansion and political 'land grab' under a flag of accelerated federalism sowed the seeds for the demise of the general consensus over the future of the region. And since the referendum of June 2016 we have seen the primary importance of federalisation most clearly evident by the intransigent stance of the EU negotiators. For them it matters not that a no deal outcome could massively hurt every individual EU state (bearing in mind that the UK is the importer of approaching 20% of all goods and services traded between member states); for them that is a price worth paying to dissuade other member states from following the UK example and so keep the federalist dream on track.
 
I don't know why anyone should be bothered about the Brexit outcome -- the EU will implode within the next decade anway.
As an economic venture it was fine. But it has long since become a political mission, ever since it began to court and then accept membership of those countries where living standards and wage levels were so different from those of the leading states. At this juncture the willingness of its leading voices and decision-makers to forego some continued economic progress in favour of expansion and political 'land grab' under a flag of accelerated federalism sowed the seeds for the demise of the general consensus over the future of the region. And since the referendum of June 2016 we have seen the primary importance of federalisation most clearly evident by the intransigent stance of the EU negotiators. For them it matters not that a no deal outcome could massively hurt every individual EU state (bearing in mind that the UK is the importer of approaching 20% of all goods and services traded between member states); for them that is a price worth paying to dissuade other member states from following the UK example and so keep the federalist dream on track.
 
Just one more thanks only this time we’ll all know the implications of what we’re voting for instead of a pack of lies, and half-truths

And MN recycles the old mantra of having another referendum because the one in 2016 didn't go the way he wanted it to (under the guise of knowing all the implications now - as if we do!). Maybe the PM will NOT issue a booklet of lies and half-truths if there is a second referendum. It didn't work first-time, anyway.

1. We've had the referendum;
2. The Politicians have made an absolute rat's-ass of everything.
3. Solution - let's have another referendum. Hilarious...

Have a nice evening (and by that I mean a crushing victory for Bayern München!)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top