A comma or hyphen would've saved me about 5 re-reads of that post
Current Affairs EU In or Out
- Thread starter micknick
- Start date
- Status
Ignore me ., my reply was meant for another poster
Frang
Player Valuation: £70m
seeing as you seem to know everything, where do we go from here septic peg ??
**mutzo rubs crystal ball
I had to read it a few times myself roydo before I posted it!
roydo
in memoriam - 1965-2024
Well, I referenced myself as the same age bracket, so hard luck on that.
The fact you admit you have not got a clue how it works, suggests that you dont have a clue. Ergo, ignorant of the process. As was I.
If the phrase "Mild Green, Fairy Liquid" stirs a memory, you are on the right lines. Just they are cleverer that Fairy Liquid.
Frang
Player Valuation: £70m
Thought you were in the pub Frank?
Frang
Player Valuation: £70m
I did post it mate, read it again, said to myself “hmmm” then thought “can’t be arsed changing it”
Why the no-deal amendment does not definitely rule out no deal
It is important to stress, of course, that the Spelman amendment passed a few minutes ago does not definitely rule out a no-deal Brexit.
There are two reasons for that.
First, it is not a binding amendment. It is not legislation, and it is not a motion that gives a formal instruction to the government (like the “humble address” motions).
The government could choose to accept it, and treat it as binding, but it has not said yet that it will. And even if it did ...
Second, it is not within the government’s power to rule out no deal (in the terms of the motion) because it does not call for article 50 to be revoked (which would probably require separate legislation anyway). Caroline Spelman and Jack Dromey, who tabled it, intended it to signal that ministers should extend article 50 in the event of no deal being agreed. But, as Theresa May says repeatedly, that only postpones the problem.
It is important to stress, of course, that the Spelman amendment passed a few minutes ago does not definitely rule out a no-deal Brexit.
There are two reasons for that.
First, it is not a binding amendment. It is not legislation, and it is not a motion that gives a formal instruction to the government (like the “humble address” motions).
The government could choose to accept it, and treat it as binding, but it has not said yet that it will. And even if it did ...
Second, it is not within the government’s power to rule out no deal (in the terms of the motion) because it does not call for article 50 to be revoked (which would probably require separate legislation anyway). Caroline Spelman and Jack Dromey, who tabled it, intended it to signal that ministers should extend article 50 in the event of no deal being agreed. But, as Theresa May says repeatedly, that only postpones the problem.
Old Blue 2
Player Valuation: £40m
So you are in the know about everything, eh? Really? Right up to the very top level? Yes?
You know how all these extraneous forces influenced me? Yes?
Try me with semantics. Please do. Or is that a throwaway word you think I do not know the meaning of?
Hang on a minute, I've got the Ruskies on the phone to me as I type...
When you actually develop your first brain cell then maybe we can talk about stuff.
Old Blue 2
Player Valuation: £40m
Russian interference in the 2016 Brexit referendum - Wikipedia
Here’s what we know about alleged Russian involvement in Brexit
We’ve heard a lot in recent weeks about Russia’s alleged involvement in the EU referendum. On Monday, Theresa May said Vladimir Putin’s government was trying to “undermine free societies” and was “planting fake stories” to “sow discord in the West”. Although on Wednesday, the Prime Minister...
www.channel4.com
So you are in the know about everything, eh? Really? Right up to the very top level? Yes?
You know how all these extraneous forces influenced me? Yes?
Try me with semantics. Please do. Or is that a throwaway word you think I do not know the meaning of?
Hang on a minute, I've got the Ruskies on the phone to me as I type...
Can’t really be arsed explaining it all to youbut there’s plenty of useful information on line. Just google Russian bot involvement in leave campaign.
- Status