It should have read sarcastic- or sarcasm - my I pad dohI do like the idea of "Scar Asti can" - Lion King meets plonk fizz, in a tin
It should have read sarcastic- or sarcasm - my I pad dohI do like the idea of "Scar Asti can" - Lion King meets plonk fizz, in a tin
Perhaps the alternative is to stay in the tent, peeing out?
In that case: 65% of Labour voters voted to remainIt should have read sarcastic- or sarcasm - my I pad doh
You gotta be in it to winnit: EU, Borg Contiunuum , whatever....That's like wanting to be part of the borg...assimilate or die
While that's correct, it's not exactly a non issue as we currently have supply chains, RoRo transport and no checks at the border with all EU. Our supply chain model is currently driven by access to the single market and free movement, which is why the UK are having to pile things like body bags and medicines.
Which is half of the problem isn't it? Pete assumes all 17.4 million think like him. You assume they all think like you. Tommy Robinson probably thinks they all support him. All of you oppose a 2nd vote to understand what the 17.4 million actually want from Brexit.
Why is it a 'non issue'?It’s a non issue......
To be honest, the most surprising thing for me that leave voters weren't voting as one homogeneous blob and there appears to be some divergence between what leave voters want. Hence how you can have lifelong, never voted Tory in me life guv, socialists lined up alongside monocle wearing weirdos.
He does have a point though. Traditional lines of voting and allegiance has somewhat been shaken up by Brexit.Your rhetoric is quite disingenuous and doesn't do your argument any good.
Do I get to bang seven of nine?That's like wanting to be part of the borg...assimilate or die
He does have a point though. Traditional lines of voting and allegiance has somewhat been shaken up by Brexit.
It is most definitely an opportunity for the likes of Rees-Mogg and Farage, insulated from the effects of Brexit.. Claiming first of all 'that there is no downside, only positives' and dismissing any alternative view as 'project fear'. Now the narrative has shifted to 'we knew we'd be worse off, it's a short term hit for long term gain' despite having no evidence to support the claim.Of course it has, that's the main reason, and, imho, the main point of it all. The divisiveness is the driving force of the storm and if you consider how disaster capitalism works then some may consider it as a motive or simply an opportunity.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.