Blues Harp
Player Valuation: £60m
"The best argument against democracy is a 5 minute conversation with the average voter" lollol
Absolute tosh. The details of the treaty were explained properly to the people whereupon it was approved; that wasn't done before the 1st referendum took place. There was no bullying involved whatsoever.
As I understand it there were amendments made to the constitution to take account of some aspects of the Treaty. The problem really was that the government were too complacent that the 1st referendum would pass and were reminded by the result of it not to take the will of the people for granted.Wasn't the Treaty amended to take note of Ireland's concerns?
Wasn't the Treaty amended to take note of Ireland's concerns?
As I understand it there were amendments made to the constitution to take account of some aspects of the Treaty. The problem really was that the government were too complacent that the 1st referendum would pass and were reminded by the result of it not to take the will of the people for granted.
I can't see how the EU would have amended the Treaty itself otherwise it would have had to seek reapproval from those EU states which had already passed it via their parliaments such as the UK who approved it in June 2008.
Absolute tosh. The details of the treaty were explained properly to the people whereupon it was approved; that wasn't done before the 1st referendum took place. There was no bullying involved whatsoever.
They did somewhat amend it, but in a technical (a legally binding protocol) way. In case of a new country joining/ somebody wants to change the treaty etc.... said text will become part of the actual treaty as a protocol. This way they avoided having to re-ratify the treaty in the national parliaments since technically not a letter had changed.
Not necessarily for the better btw.
E.g: For some reason Ireland had an issue with the rotation system for European Commissioners, they wanted to keep 1 a/country. They also wanted assurances that the Treaty would leave their rules on euthanasia and abortion intact. And there was also the reassurance that the treaty wouldn't influence their fiscal rules more than beforehand (was a bit unnecessary but okay), same with their neutrality.
Let me repeat. Japan now have a free trade deal with the EU so can utilise the manufacturing capability they have in Japan with unfettered access to Europe. Add into the mix that the X-trail is a diesel engined car, whose sales are in free fall because of cheating German manufacturers, and you are getting nearer the truth. Of course any uncertainties over Brexit are a worry, but not the reason for building in Japan.......
So it's a win for Japan, a stalemate for the EU, and a loss for Sunderland. Sound.
Yep. Freetrade agreements can do that. But it would have happened whether the U.K. was in or out of the EU.....
Yep, I agree. Said a few times, and as one who would rather remain, blaming Brexit for every negative story is pointless. And dangerous. There will be some bad stuff that will be a direct result of it, but equally, it can also be a convenient fig leaf at times.
Like today, HMV has been bought by some Canadian company, saving 1500 jobs. Down to Brexit? Nah. Similar thing with Nissan.
Its more likely though that HMV has been bought in order to pick the remaining bits of meat off the carcass (including the brand).
Yep, I agree. Said a few times, and as one who would rather remain, blaming Brexit for every negative story is pointless. And dangerous. There will be some bad stuff that will be a direct result of it, but equally, it can also be a convenient fig leaf at times.
Like today, HMV has been bought by some Canadian company, saving 1500 jobs. Down to Brexit? Nah. Similar thing with Nissan.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.