Current Affairs EU In or Out

In or Out

  • In

    Votes: 688 67.9%

  • Out

    Votes: 325 32.1%
  • Total voters
    1,013
Status
Not open for further replies.
peteblue said:
Hahahahaha.......can’t wait to tell all my mates and the farmers by me that we were all duped and led by the nose by the Kremlin via something called Facebook. A social media platform mainly utilised by the young, who apparently all voted Remain, and shunned or unknown to the older generation who apparently voted for Brexit. So we are led to believe that the gullible young, who voted Remain, saw through this and went with their considered opinions, while the older voters, who aren’t on Facebook anyway, were convinced Svengali like to vote Leave, even though they understood life before the EU. I smell someone promoting a new book.........
Click to expand...

if its any help pete you, your mates and the farmers were duped and led by the noise by the Mail, not the Facebook or Russians
 
I was looking through the slidepack used by the EU to gain acceptance by the 27 to virtually exclude the U.K. from the Galileo programme. It was basically, these are the things we allow 3rd countries to access, this is what the U.K. wants to access, but the U.K. will be a 3rd country therefore we cannot allow it.

Now the logic is inescapable, but there is a difference between countries who have always been 3rd countries, to the likes of the U.K. who will become a 3rd country. I didn’t see one slide where the EU actually mentioned that the U.K. currently provide a large proportion of the technology, infrastructure and finance. The slides were just designed to show how a 3rd party doesn’t get to play anymore. Nowhere did it show the technical or financial effect of rejecting the U.K. input. For me, this highlights some of the differences between the EU and the U.K., practicalities and sensible compromise are ignored on the altar of Eu rules.

There may well be a realisation by the EU at some point, but my guess is that by then we will have either set up another system working with Canada and Australia, or just become a partner of the NASA programmes. Bridges are being burnt it seems.......
 
Joey66 said:
Is that all you think off being a lover of Momentum - a third of Labour voters voted brexit what representation was that on voting against their own voters interest?...........
ALL parties in that Westminster bubble are a disgrace mind you - I will not vote only if the is a forced 2nd brexit referendum, and that will be OUT again.......
Click to expand...

I've never been a member of Momentum, lol.
 
peteblue said:
I was looking through the slidepack used by the EU to gain acceptance by the 27 to virtually exclude the U.K. from the Galileo programme. It was basically, these are the things we allow 3rd countries to access, this is what the U.K. wants to access, but the U.K. will be a 3rd country therefore we cannot allow it.

Now the logic is inescapable, but there is a difference between countries who have always been 3rd countries, to the likes of the U.K. who will become a 3rd country. I didn’t see one slide where the EU actually mentioned that the U.K. currently provide a large proportion of the technology, infrastructure and finance. The slides were just designed to show how a 3rd party doesn’t get to play anymore. Nowhere did it show the technical or financial effect of rejecting the U.K. input. For me, this highlights some of the differences between the EU and the U.K., practicalities and sensible compromise are ignored on the altar of Eu rules.

There may well be a realisation by the EU at some point, but my guess is that by then we will have either set up another system working with Canada and Australia, or just become a partner of the NASA programmes. Bridges are being burnt it seems.......
Click to expand...

Practicalities and sensible compromise have been used by the British government :lol: Oh my.
 
See the times is reporting the public will be warned of the consequences of no deal Brexit, however,
"Ministers have so far refused to expand on a commitment to release 70 technical notices on “no-deal” contingencies after the Chequers agreement on the next stage in negotiations with Brussels."

As we are left guesing as usual with this government reckon its time for Pathe and the Ministry of information-

Maybe a proper public service job for Rees Mogg and the BoJo.





All Success to your crops and dig for victory!
 
NilSatisOptimum said:
See the times is reporting the public will be warned of the consequences of no deal Brexit, however,
"Ministers have so far refused to expand on a commitment to release 70 technical notices on “no-deal” contingencies after the Chequers agreement on the next stage in negotiations with Brussels."

As we are left guesing as usual with this government reckon its time for Pathe and the Ministry of information-

Maybe a proper public service job for Rees Mogg and the BoJo.





All Success to your crops and dig for victory!
Click to expand...

We can't dig for victory as we have already won the out vote that was a victory.......
 
Joey66 said:
We can't dig for victory as we have already won the out vote that was a victory.......
Click to expand...
I don't think it's the smell of victory
jbyyGol.png
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

→ Log in 🔑 Register
🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top