Yes on a controlled system - no free movement one of the EU enshrined tablets of stone!That’s a very good chart. However does it require EU membership ? The jobs will still be here, the people we want will still be able to come......
Yes on a controlled system - no free movement one of the EU enshrined tablets of stone!That’s a very good chart. However does it require EU membership ? The jobs will still be here, the people we want will still be able to come......
Probably cardiac
Bruce the oncost of extra housing admit it is poor practice to allow immigration the population of Hull to arrive each year without controlled work permits?
Plus the immigration Bruce,??So you'd advocate controlling the birth rate of the nation as well on the same Malthusian logic?
Plus the immigration Bruce,??
Work permit, and Visa control like other big countries outside the EU use - you try to move to Australia, Canada , and the USA!There are 26 countries in the world that we currently have a free movement agreement with.
So there are about, god knows, a 100(?) other that we do have controls over.
Where do you reckon the problem, in your mind apparently, is?
Work permit, and Visa control like other big countries outside the EU use - you try to move to Australia, Canada , and the USA!
A debate does not involve questions and answers. It is a discussion. IT MAY have the odd question. But there is no obligation on either party to answer questions put to them, if they feel the question is loaded, stupid, etc..
And to answr your point, go look at my response in BIG letters a few posts ago.
Do you really think you can trap me by asking vague questions? Here's a question for your consideration: What was the intention behind the Chancellor in the run-up to the Referendum stating that there would be a swingeing budget against the ordinary working people if 'Leave' won? I don't expect you to answer...
No we will have the same controls as other countries I mentioned- immigration definitely - but stipulated work visa and short stay visas from all over the world - As a country though we have to make a big move to stop our skill shortages, and make it harder for easy top professionals migration - e.g. Doctors / Nurses who thin here pay back their training if the flit for top salaries immediately- my son for instance any it paid exams if he leaves within 12 months his company take all the cost of his training back out of his 3 months notice!Quite. But you say a city the size of Hull pitches up every year, when we have controls over non EU countries. EU immigration accounts for a small % of our overall immigration. And their, (EU) contribution to the UK economy is positive.
So not sure why you think the "problem" will be sorted by leaving the EU.
But we voted OUT, so I should get over it I guess.
You need mocking - tell me how much does it cost us on being in the single market ?Wow - there's no need to get angry here mate. A debate does involve questions being answered. We're discussing the £350m bus. I have no issue accepting that figure is correct in a very abstract sense given it has no effective meaning to the man in the street given it ignores both the rebate and the net benefit (or cost) of wider EU membership.
I believe the bus message sought to convey the idea that a vote to leave could directly translate to £350m more going into the NHS each week. I think it really was as simple and as blunt as that. What do you think?
I am genuinely intrigued to know how you think the message was intended to play out and where any subtleties or caveats played out.
In tandem perhaps I am very happy to answer your question.
I think the doomsday economic scenario predicted on the announcement of a No vote was based on the assumption of Article 50 being executed more or less immediately. Of course it wasn't and instead we had the circus of a Tory leadership election and a general election. So there was no immediate cliff edge but let's not forget that the Governor of the Bank of England was forced to announce a historic level of market intervention following the Referendum with £250 billion of guarantees.
But let's not kid ourselves that the Brexit vote hasn't already been damaging to the UK.
Before the EU Referendum we were in a very strong economic position. Take a look at the the IMF World Economic Outlook figures from Jan 2016:
Rank 1 = UK - 2014 (2.9%), 2015 (2.2%), 2016 (2.2%), 2017 (2.2%) UK 4-year average 2.4%
Rank 2 = Germany - 2014 (1.6%), 2015 (1.5%), 2016 (1.7%), 2017 (1.7%) Germany 4-year average 1.6%
Rank 3 = Euro Area - 2014 (0.9%), 2015 (1.5%), 2016 (1.7%), 2017 (1.7%) Euro Area 4-year average 1.5%
Rank 4 = France - 2014 (0.2%), 2015 (1.1%), 2016 (1.3%), 2017 (1.5%) France 4-year average 1.0%
We were miles ahead of Germany and the rest of Europe.
http://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2016/12/31/Subdued-Demand-Diminished-Prospects
Fast-forward two years and this is what the Brexit vote has done for us:
Rank 1 = Germany - 2016 (1.9%), 2017 (2.5%), 2018 (2.3%), 2019 (2.0%) Germany 4-year average 2.2%
Rank 2 = Euro Area - 2016 (1.8%), 2017 (2.4%), 2018 (2.2%), 2019 (2.0%) Euro Area 4-year average 2.1%
Rank 3 = France - 2016 (1.2%), 2017 (1.8%), 2018 (1.9%), 2019 (1.9%) France 4-year average 1.7%
Rank 4 = UK - 2016 (1.9%), 2017 (1.7%), 2018 (1.5%), 2019 (1.5%). UK 4-year average 1.6%
We are now the sick man of Europe and we haven't even got to grips with the implications of a Hard Brexit.
http://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2018/01/11/world-economic-outlook-update-january-2018
Of course I've no doubt that @Joey66 will mock me for doing some research and @peteblue will look to dismiss economic statistics as irrelevant in any case but what says you? Do you not accept the economic performance and outlook has taken a pounding from the Brexit vote?
Wow - there's no need to get angry here mate. A debate does involve questions being answered. We're discussing the £350m bus. I have no issue accepting that figure is correct in a very abstract sense given it has no effective meaning to the man in the street given it ignores both the rebate and the net benefit (or cost) of wider EU membership.
I believe the bus message sought to convey the idea that a vote to leave could directly translate to £350m more going into the NHS each week. I think it really was as simple and as blunt as that. What do you think?
I am genuinely intrigued to know how you think the message was intended to play out and where any subtleties or caveats played out.
In tandem perhaps I am very happy to answer your question.
I think the doomsday economic scenario predicted on the announcement of a No vote was based on the assumption of Article 50 being executed more or less immediately. Of course it wasn't and instead we had the circus of a Tory leadership election and a general election. So there was no immediate cliff edge but let's not forget that the Governor of the Bank of England was forced to announce a historic level of market intervention following the Referendum with £250 billion of guarantees.
But let's not kid ourselves that the Brexit vote hasn't already been damaging to the UK.
Before the EU Referendum we were in a very strong economic position. Take a look at the the IMF World Economic Outlook figures from Jan 2016:
Rank 1 = UK - 2014 (2.9%), 2015 (2.2%), 2016 (2.2%), 2017 (2.2%) UK 4-year average 2.4%
Rank 2 = Germany - 2014 (1.6%), 2015 (1.5%), 2016 (1.7%), 2017 (1.7%) Germany 4-year average 1.6%
Rank 3 = Euro Area - 2014 (0.9%), 2015 (1.5%), 2016 (1.7%), 2017 (1.7%) Euro Area 4-year average 1.5%
Rank 4 = France - 2014 (0.2%), 2015 (1.1%), 2016 (1.3%), 2017 (1.5%) France 4-year average 1.0%
We were miles ahead of Germany and the rest of Europe.
http://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2016/12/31/Subdued-Demand-Diminished-Prospects
Fast-forward two years and this is what the Brexit vote has done for us:
Rank 1 = Germany - 2016 (1.9%), 2017 (2.5%), 2018 (2.3%), 2019 (2.0%) Germany 4-year average 2.2%
Rank 2 = Euro Area - 2016 (1.8%), 2017 (2.4%), 2018 (2.2%), 2019 (2.0%) Euro Area 4-year average 2.1%
Rank 3 = France - 2016 (1.2%), 2017 (1.8%), 2018 (1.9%), 2019 (1.9%) France 4-year average 1.7%
Rank 4 = UK - 2016 (1.9%), 2017 (1.7%), 2018 (1.5%), 2019 (1.5%). UK 4-year average 1.6%
We are now the sick man of Europe and we haven't even got to grips with the implications of a Hard Brexit.
http://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2018/01/11/world-economic-outlook-update-january-2018
Of course I've no doubt that @Joey66 will mock me for doing some research and @peteblue will look to dismiss economic statistics as irrelevant in any case but what says you? Do you not accept the economic performance and outlook has taken a pounding from the Brexit vote?
Wow - there's no need to get angry here mate. A debate does involve questions being answered. We're discussing the £350m bus. I have no issue accepting that figure is correct in a very abstract sense given it has no effective meaning to the man in the street given it ignores both the rebate and the net benefit (or cost) of wider EU membership.
I believe the bus message sought to convey the idea that a vote to leave could directly translate to £350m more going into the NHS each week. I think it really was as simple and as blunt as that. What do you think?
I am genuinely intrigued to know how you think the message was intended to play out and where any subtleties or caveats played out.
In tandem perhaps I am very happy to answer your question.
I think the doomsday economic scenario predicted on the announcement of a No vote was based on the assumption of Article 50 being executed more or less immediately. Of course it wasn't and instead we had the circus of a Tory leadership election and a general election. So there was no immediate cliff edge but let's not forget that the Governor of the Bank of England was forced to announce a historic level of market intervention following the Referendum with £250 billion of guarantees.
But let's not kid ourselves that the Brexit vote hasn't already been damaging to the UK.
Before the EU Referendum we were in a very strong economic position. Take a look at the the IMF World Economic Outlook figures from Jan 2016:
Rank 1 = UK - 2014 (2.9%), 2015 (2.2%), 2016 (2.2%), 2017 (2.2%) UK 4-year average 2.4%
Rank 2 = Germany - 2014 (1.6%), 2015 (1.5%), 2016 (1.7%), 2017 (1.7%) Germany 4-year average 1.6%
Rank 3 = Euro Area - 2014 (0.9%), 2015 (1.5%), 2016 (1.7%), 2017 (1.7%) Euro Area 4-year average 1.5%
Rank 4 = France - 2014 (0.2%), 2015 (1.1%), 2016 (1.3%), 2017 (1.5%) France 4-year average 1.0%
We were miles ahead of Germany and the rest of Europe.
http://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2016/12/31/Subdued-Demand-Diminished-Prospects
Fast-forward two years and this is what the Brexit vote has done for us:
Rank 1 = Germany - 2016 (1.9%), 2017 (2.5%), 2018 (2.3%), 2019 (2.0%) Germany 4-year average 2.2%
Rank 2 = Euro Area - 2016 (1.8%), 2017 (2.4%), 2018 (2.2%), 2019 (2.0%) Euro Area 4-year average 2.1%
Rank 3 = France - 2016 (1.2%), 2017 (1.8%), 2018 (1.9%), 2019 (1.9%) France 4-year average 1.7%
Rank 4 = UK - 2016 (1.9%), 2017 (1.7%), 2018 (1.5%), 2019 (1.5%). UK 4-year average 1.6%
We are now the sick man of Europe and we haven't even got to grips with the implications of a Hard Brexit.
http://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2018/01/11/world-economic-outlook-update-january-2018
Of course I've no doubt that @Joey66 will mock me for doing some research and @peteblue will look to dismiss economic statistics as irrelevant in any case but what says you? Do you not accept the economic performance and outlook has taken a pounding from the Brexit vote?
You need mocking - tell me how much does it cost us on being in the single market ?
The EU make a fortune out of us on tarrifs outside the EU when we trade - stopping imports or us having a larger export market - we should have walked after article 50 was signed as they will drag thes negotions on for ever!
Hahaha, remainers getting pretty desperate now.....
Independent...”New Brexit delays at UK borders and airports could endanger extremely time-sensitive transplant operations as medics rush to get organs to patients, MPs and MEPs have warned.”.......
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.