Charlie Sweet
Player Valuation: £35m
'cos the Daily Mail and Rupert Murdoch conned the great unwashed to buy in to their xenophobic agenda.
Current Affairs EU In or Out
- Thread starter micknick
- Start date
- Status
'cos the Daily Mail and Rupert Murdoch conned the great unwashed to buy in to their xenophobic agenda.
Old Blue 2
Player Valuation: £40m
Really? You actually believe that...?
Did you not read points '1' and '2' of my post?
Do you know what democracy is/means?
Charlie Sweet
Player Valuation: £35m
Really? You actually believe that...?
Yes - for a large proportion of Leave voters I think that applies.
A lot of the rest were bribed on the £350m a week Jobbie.
I think maybe 5% had a sense of a clearly thought out philosophy.
Old Blue 2
Player Valuation: £40m
No point in trying to continue any sensible discussion with you about democracy and the vote...
4 distinct countries with their own culture, traditition, history and ethnicity. Two of those countries wish to remain in Europe, they can’t due gerrymandering. That’s not democracy it’s autocratic rule.
The voting block is as follows:
England 84.1%
Scotland 8.3%
Wales 4.8%
N.I. 2.8%
The U.K. Is not a democracy all it’s citzens don’t have equal rights. If your from Scotland and your country votes to remain in Europe, it doesnt matter.
It’s political apartheid.
Unless they want a banana republic?
I hope everyone who voted leave is going to apologise when the EU has well and truly shafted us, the economy is in the bin, and we're all having to eat our own pets to survive.
Get the EU to apologise if they shaft you!
They've been shafting the UK for years and want a pay off too!
Learn it then mate, it helps.
We were shafted by politicians giving people an unrealistic idea of what Brexit might look like. I don't blame the EU for playing hardball with us for jibbing them off.
Can I interest you in a mandate?
Anyone brings up anything and it's this.
Do you lot really believe this is how debate works? Honestly?
Old Blue 2
Player Valuation: £40m
Have you read my post where I went into detail about the democratic vote? Post #22687 on page 1512.
The guy did not respond in any way shape or form to my point about the democratic vote. Instead, he replied with this: "...'cos the Daily Mail and Rupert Murdoch conned the great unwashed to buy in to their xenophobic agenda..."
I have no problem with people not being happy with the outcome (that has been ongoing since 24th June last year), but for you to question me as to how debate works...
Exactly what I did there, well noticed. Bet you a tenner if it was a post longer than 17 words you'd actually misinterpret whatever you want out of about 3 words you've seen, as it is the agenda.
Just like I told you when I wrote a massive post about a ton of things I find wrong with that and your (might be Joey's, not 100% on this) reply was "well leave won though so it doesn't matter".
Then I did the same thing, more fool me, earlier this week - got the same reply, this time defo not off you.
Honestly, that's how debate works? Should've stuck to "no mate you're dead wrong now shut up" every time anyone posts anything I don't agree with.
And yes, asking you, who uses "no point in discussing this with you anymore" in a demeaning manner, not only in this case, but in many others. Disclaimer: might not be the same words, but words used to the same effect.
But I guess leave won, that's what you wanted, doesn't matter what anyone says as if it doesn't suit your agenda - everything changes in this miraculous unicorn of a 'debate' you have in your head.
- Status