Current Affairs EU In or Out

In or Out

  • In

    Votes: 688 67.9%
  • Out

    Votes: 325 32.1%

  • Total voters
    1,013
Status
Not open for further replies.
ALWAYS going to be an effect of Brexit:

UK-based airlines told to move to Europe after Brexit or lose major routes
Exclusive: Fears for UK jobs as EU officials say airlines will need to move base and majority of shareholders to fly routes within Europe



It is thought that both easyJet and Ryanair would have less than 50% of their shares held by EU nationals after Brexit. Photograph: Andrew Yates/Reuters

Follow Daniel Boffey

EU chiefs have warned airlines including easyJet, Ryanair and British Airways that they will need to relocate headquarters and sell off shares to European nationals if they want to continue flying routes within continental Europe after Brexit.

Goldman Sachs to move hundreds of staff out of London due to Brexit

Executives at major carriers have been reminded during recent private meetings with officials that to continue to operate on routes across the continent – for instance from Milan to Paris – they must have a significant base on EU territory and that a majority of their capital shares must be EU-owned.

The development, just days from the triggering of article 50, potentially makes it more likely that the carriers will now act to restructure, with economic consequences for the UK, including a loss of jobs.

AdvertisementHide

The tough-line from the EU may encourage the UK to reciprocate with its own nationality rules, which would leave EU owned airlines with equally difficult choices about the future, potentially dampening their investment in the UK in the short term, although some may seek in time to establish their own British subsidiaries.

The ability of companies such as easyJet to operate on routes across the EU has been a major part of their business models, and there may be a renewed willingness among some to invest outside the UK to maintain market share.

Some airlines have already started to seek alternative headquarters, and to examine how they might ensure that their shareholding is majority-EU owned, possibly through the forced disinvesting of British shareholders.

But others have appeared, until now, to hold out hope that the European commission would be flexible on the rules in the current aviation agreement.

EU officials in the meetings were clear, however, about the rigidity of the rules, amid concerns at a senior EU level that too many in the aviation industry are in denial about the consequences of the UK’s decision to leave the bloc.

Representatives from easyJet, along with the British Airways owner IAG, Ryanair and the Tui Group, whose portfolio of airlines includes Thomson, met the EU’s Brexit taskforce last week. That followed a meeting the previous week between the taskforce and executives from Air France-KLM, Finnair, Lufthansa and SAS, as part of the EU’s efforts to engage with stakeholders.

Thomas van der Wijngaart, an aviation expert at the legal firm Clyde & Co, told the Guardian that there could be significant economic consequences for the UK with airlines changing their financial and operating structures, and building a stronger presence on the continent.

“It might be that carriers choose to have domestic flights [on the continent] operated by their new European operating licence, which would probably mean a reduction in staff in the UK,” he warned.

Britain is currently a member of an aviation agreement based on 35 shared pieces of EU legislation, a common regulator in the European Aviation Safety Agency, and a court acting as a referee on the shared rules, the European court of justice (ECJ).

However, asked during a select committee hearing last week whether the UK would continue to be part of the “open-skies” agreement after Brexit, the secretary of state for exiting the EU, David Davis, said: “Not that agreement ... One would presume that would not apply to us – doesn’t say anything about whether there would be a successor.”

The industry holds out hope that the UK and the EU will be able to seal an early deal during article 50 negotiations that ensures that damage to the industry is limited.

However a hurdle on progress on a new agreement is Theresa May’s intention to remove the UK from the ECJ’s jurisdiction, which currently has the key role in adjudicating over conflicts between parties to the agreement.

A number of member states may also have interests in standing in the way of Britain’s attempts to strike a new deal. Spanish diplomats, for example, say they will not sign any international aviation agreement that recognises the airport on Gibraltar.

The UK could react to the imposition of EU ownership rules on airlines by developing ownership rules of its own, which could prevent carriers such as the Ireland-based Ryanair from flying UK domestic routes, as it does today.

EasyJet is currently establishing an EU operating company – on which an announcement is expected within weeks – so that it can attain an EU air operating certificate. The company insists, however, that it will continue to be headquartered in the UK.

It is currently 84% owned by EU nationals, but this will drop to 49% after Brexit, provided the shares of founder Stelios Haji-Ioannou – who has dual UK and Cypriot nationality – are classed as EU-owned.

The Financial Times has reported that Haji-Ioannou’s shares are now classed as UK-owned to meet the airline’s own restrictions on ownership.

An easyJet spokesman said: “Like other European airlines, easyJet regularly engages with the UK and the EU on a wide range of issues which include the impact of Brexit on aviation. As this was a private meeting, we wouldn’t comment further on what was discussed.”

It has been reported that 60% of Dublin-registered Ryanair’s capital shares are owned by EU nationals, but this will be reduced to 40% once UK shareholders are excluded.

A spokesman for the airline said the company would “adapt”. However the airline’s chief executive officer, Michael O’Leary, has already warned of the huge dangers to the industry of a “cliff-edge” Brexit, and attacked the “mildly lunatic optimism” of the British government.

A Ryanair spokesman said: “While it appears that we are heading for a hard Brexit, there is still significant uncertainty in relation to what exactly this will entail.

“This uncertainty will continue to represent a challenge for our business for the remainder of financial year 17 and financial year 18.”

Getting shut of some of these is a bonus.....
 
I know there are various EU wide agreements around flying that are designed to ease travel across the continent, but this doesn't appear to be in relation to that. I hope I'm wrong, but that doesn't seem a very fair move for passengers by the EU.
 
I know there are various EU wide agreements around flying that are designed to ease travel across the continent, but this doesn't appear to be in relation to that. I hope I'm wrong, but that doesn't seem a very fair move for passengers by the EU.

Bruce, this was always on the cards. I was reading about it in the Guardian months ago.
 
Bruce, this was always on the cards. I was reading about it in the Guardian months ago.

That may be so, but unless there's a practical reason for this then it comes across as protectionism. Now I believe there are some areas around air traffic control and various other non-tariff issues that may be a factor, but if they aren't and they're just saying that to operate in Europe you have to be based in Europe, that's pretty poor imo and goes against the openness agenda that the EC push heavily.
 
And this was one of the greatest pieces of backstabbing skulduggery that the UK politicians ever came up with, allowing our commonwealth friends to be replaced by the Europeans ........

Our Commonwealth friends. Who we conquered and ruthlessly exploited for centuries.

As for "the Europeans," many of us feel a much keener affinity with our European brothers than we do with some vague Imperial comfort blanket.
 
Let the negotiations begin - I have a horrible feeling it will drag on so much so the EU will be in crisis before we walk away!
the elections in france and Germany will have a big say in our brexit!
 
Eu..we want £50Bn
UK..sod off
Eu..but you want access to our market
UK..and you want access to ours
Eu..but we are bigger than you
UK..yet you sell more to us
Eu..but we are a huge market
UK.. there's a big world out there
Eu..but we are really powerful
UK..and we have nuclear weapons
Eu..but we will punish you
UK..and you still want access to our finance
Eu..but there's 27 of us
UK...and we really don't give a crap........
Explain?
 
Re the headline, does he mean bad for globalised corporations which if Brexit is, I am all in favour of that.

Re it threatening Britain's status in science and innovation, there's no reason why it has to - IMO that's up to the government to manage or fund effectively

Hard to distinguish the two in terms of science and innovation. You need the research being done at one end (with funding and the best talent to do it), all the way to the ease with which that research can be taken to market at the other (which requires not only ease of setting up, IP protection, finance etc. which we're great at, but also access to foreign markets and the right talent to grow the business).

We're ranked as one of the best places in the world for innovation, and there's a significant challenge to maintain that, as doing so is considerably more than just fixing some tariffs.
Re: the science part - it's a lot easier when a lot of the research is EU funded and experts from all over can come over with no problems.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top