Current Affairs Environmental Stuff

[Oddball]

Let's try again. The consensus amongst serious scientists is that the issue is settled. Much like germ theory or the concept of gravity.

there is never a consensus in the field of science. thats why scientists keep on being scientists, they test theories etc and keep moving forwards discovering new stuff..............this is weird, do i really need to have to explain this to you? Let`s try again, science is never settled and i view anyone peddling this kind of argument as unscientific. regarding `climate science` and consensus, because any dissenting voices are silenced i tend to question as to why.

 

[Lobster Johnson]

there is never a consensus in the field of science. thats why scientists keep on being scientists, they test theories etc and keep moving forwards discovering new stuff..............this is weird, do i really need to have to explain this to you? Let`s try again, science is never settled and i view anyone peddling this kind of argument as unscientific. regarding `climate science` and consensus, because any dissenting voices are silenced i tend to question as to why.

You're saying there is no scientific consensus on anything? That we don't accept a series of assumptions and laws as correct until proven otherwise? That we do not know and can never know how anything works?

Consensus is different to settled.

 

[Brennan]

there is never a consensus in the field of science. thats why scientists keep on being scientists, they test theories etc and keep moving forwards discovering new stuff..............this is weird, do i really need to have to explain this to you? Let`s try again, science is never settled and i view anyone peddling this kind of argument as unscientific. regarding `climate science` and consensus, because any dissenting voices are silenced i tend to question as to why.

Bollocks.

 

[Prevenger17]

Lol what a fool this Oddball is

 

[Bruce Wayne]

You're saying there is no scientific consensus on anything? That we don't accept a series of assumptions and laws as correct until proven otherwise? That we do not know and can never know how anything works?

Consensus is different to settled.

I read a paper the other day saying that if you block idiots online your mental health goes up by 17.5%, whereas if you try to engage with them your brain explodes.

 

[Daveysgingerlovechild]

science is never settled, hopefully it will always be challenged but at the moment the `official` consensus is that global man made warming IS settled. you pretend to want a serious debate and i appreciate the almost pious devotion of your charade so i`ll take you at your word. who challenged/debated the `heat island` aspect of my argument? is being critical about the policy of spending £billions on `renewables` illegitimate? btw- like your `1pc of posts on topic` claim, the climate alarmists employ the same strategy of exaggeration and misdirection

Ah yes, the paradigm shift is always a possibility in any scientific orthodoxy.

Who, in your opinion, is credibly leading the debate to challenge the current axioms?

I'll add a cat giph for good measure. We all like those.

 

[Prevenger17]

ShieldSquare Captcha

iopscience.iop.org

"Our results confirm, as has been found in numerous other previous studies of this question, that there is no significant scientific debate among experts about whether or not climate change is human-caused. This issue has been comprehensively settled, and the reality of ACC is no more in contention among scientists than is plate tectonics or evolution. The tiny number of papers that have been published during our time period which disagree with this overwhelming scientific consensus have had no discernible impact, presumably because they do not provide any convincing evidence to refute the hypothesis that—in the words of IPCC AR5—'it is extremely likely that human influence has been the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century' [12], and, most recently in IPCC AR6—'it is unequivocal that human influence has warmed the atmosphere, ocean and land' [13]."

 

[Lobster Johnson]

I read a paper the other day saying that if you block idiots online your mental health goes up by 17.5%, whereas if you try to engage with them your brain explodes.

Yeah but there's no such thing as evidence. That's just, like, your opinion, man.

 

[orchard]

science is never settled, hopefully it will always be challenged but at the moment the `official` consensus is that global man made warming IS settled. you pretend to want a serious debate and i appreciate the almost pious devotion of your charade so i`ll take you at your word. who challenged/debated the `heat island` aspect of my argument? is being critical about the policy of spending £billions on `renewables` illegitimate? btw- like your `1pc of posts on topic` claim, the climate alarmists employ the same strategy of exaggeration and misdirection

Listen son. Just put your blunt down and hear yer mar out for once. I know you've had a hard time dealing with life, but what happened between me and your uncle Geoff was an accident whilst we were changing the lightbulb, like I told you. Come out of your room and give me a hug. I'll put the kettle on.

 

[Oddball]

Listen son. Just put your blunt down and hear yer mar out for once. I know you've had a hard time dealing with life, but what happened between me and your uncle Geoff was an accident whilst we were changing the lightbulb, like I told you. Come out of your room and give me a hug. I'll put the kettle on.

i accept your invitation to dance.

 

[Bruce Wayne]

Yeah but there's no such thing as evidence. That's just, like, your opinion, man.

You would think, but I learned about it via a YouTube video, so sniff it.

 

[summerisle]

there is never a consensus in the field of science. thats why scientists keep on being scientists, they test theories etc and keep moving forwards discovering new stuff..............this is weird, do i really need to have to explain this to you? Let`s try again, science is never settled and i view anyone peddling this kind of argument as unscientific. regarding `climate science` and consensus, because any dissenting voices are silenced i tend to question as to why.

 

[Oddball]

You're saying there is no scientific consensus on anything? That we don't accept a series of assumptions and laws as correct until proven otherwise? That we do not know and can never know how anything works?

Consensus is different to settled.

pardon et moi if i used the wrong lingo. i`m talking about the `consensus/settled` science on global warming, the stuff Al Gore made a fortune on while jetting around telling us `inconvenient truths` the poor guy didn`t want to break the bad news to us bless him, but he did get well compensated

 

[Lobster Johnson]

pardon et moi if i used the wrong lingo. i`m talking about the `consensus/settled` science on global warming, the stuff Al Gore made a fortune on while jetting around telling us `inconvenient truths` the poor guy didn`t want to break the bad news to us bless him, but he did get well compensated

What scientific consensus do you believe in and why is it different to man made climate change?

 

[Oddball]

What scientific consensus do you believe in and why is it different to man made climate change?

i believe you suffer terribly Johnson, you have an inner conflict which affects you on a very deep level but the upside is you are so shallow that you are blissfully unaware of your condition- swings and roundabouts you might say. this differs from man-made climate warming as you (man) are responsible for yourself and your unfortunate state, whereas `man-made global changing` is not your fault. or mine come to that!