Current Affairs Environmental Stuff

Status
Not open for further replies.
Using an earlier example of where you embarrassed yourself to draw attention away from your recent embarrassment is a bold play.

Nailed it though.



bold-commentary.gif
 
Using an earlier example of where you embarrassed yourself to draw attention away from your recent embarrassment is a bold play.

Nailed it though.
did i? i`ve just watched a ten minute video you posted on July 27, the content of which was solely past crimes committed by the Met police. i understand why you posted it and i wouldn`t dream of calling anyone out for drawing attention to those incidents no matter how long ago they were or even if they just happened to come across them recently, you seem to think that corruption etc. extends only as far as your personal experience and understanding goes, its a big world friendo....so take it easy out there you crazy kid.
 
did i? i`ve just watched a ten minute video you posted on July 27, the content of which was solely past crimes committed by the Met police. i understand why you posted it and i wouldn`t dream of calling anyone out for drawing attention to those incidents no matter how long ago they were or even if they just happened to come across them recently, you seem to think that corruption etc. extends only as far as your personal experience and understanding goes, its a big world friendo....so take it easy out there you crazy kid.
Yes you embarrassed yourself. And you know it. Which is why you're deflecting.

As to the video I posted (It wasn't me that made it to be clear - I know that can be confusing for you) is not about crimes committed by the Met, it's about institutionalised failings and culture that allows failure. The rest of what you said was gibberish but that's to be expected.

It's also nothing to do with environmental stuff, so nothing to do with this thread.

Stay safe out there kiddo, life can be tricky at times.
 
Yes you embarrassed yourself. And you know it. Which is why you're deflecting.

As to the video I posted (It wasn't me that made it to be clear - I know that can be confusing for you) is not about crimes committed by the Met, it's about institutionalised failings and culture that allows failure. The rest of what you said was gibberish but that's to be expected.

It's also nothing to do with environmental stuff, so nothing to do with this thread.

Stay safe out there kiddo, life can be tricky at times.
1/ deflecting? it was a joke at your expense about how `drawing attention` to incidents can be used to further a cause.
2/ you are a boor and i wouldn`t for one second expect you to understand a single thing about me or what i post.
3/ `life is tricky at times`? how do you know, the intelligence that comes across in your posts suggests you have had very little life experience.
i`ll let the rest of your spluttering attempt of an excuse for post speak for itself.
 
1/ deflecting? it was a joke at your expense about how `drawing attention` to incidents can be used to further a cause.
2/ you are a boor and i wouldn`t for one second expect you to understand a single thing about me or what i post.
3/ `life is tricky at times`? how do you know, the intelligence that comes across in your posts suggests you have had very little life experience.
i`ll let the rest of your spluttering attempt of an excuse for post speak for itself.
Hey kiddo, do you enjoy cat GIFs?



Here's a cat keeping cool in the hot weather.

Chin up.
 
1/ deflecting? it was a joke at your expense about how `drawing attention` to incidents can be used to further a cause.
2/ you are a boor and i wouldn`t for one second expect you to understand a single thing about me or what i post.
3/ `life is tricky at times`? how do you know, the intelligence that comes across in your posts suggests you have had very little life experience.
i`ll let the rest of your spluttering attempt of an excuse for post speak for itself.

Was it not just whataboutism?
 
1/ deflecting? it was a joke at your expense about how `drawing attention` to incidents can be used to further a cause.
2/ you are a boor and i wouldn`t for one second expect you to understand a single thing about me or what i post.
3/ `life is tricky at times`? how do you know, the intelligence that comes across in your posts suggests you have had very little life experience.
i`ll let the rest of your spluttering attempt of an excuse for post speak for itself.
Any chance you could stay broadly on topic? Yanno, taking shots at particular environmental legislation is legit, but that was probably around 1pc of your posts here, and lacked substantiation when challenged. The rest have been about yourself. Engage in topical debate or jog on.
 
That's nothing compared to the winter of 1976. It was so cold tauntauns returned to the British Isles.
"Weather is getting consistently more volatile leading to much higher temperatures and colder winters".

Yes well heres one example of when it was reasonably hot for a long period of time 50 years ago to prove you wrong.
 
Any chance you could stay broadly on topic? Yanno, taking shots at particular environmental legislation is legit, but that was probably around 1pc of your posts here, and lacked substantiation when challenged. The rest have been about yourself. Engage in topical debate or jog on.
science is never settled, hopefully it will always be challenged but at the moment the `official` consensus is that global man made warming IS settled. you pretend to want a serious debate and i appreciate the almost pious devotion of your charade so i`ll take you at your word. who challenged/debated the `heat island` aspect of my argument? is being critical about the policy of spending £billions on `renewables` illegitimate? btw- like your `1pc of posts on topic` claim, the climate alarmists employ the same strategy of exaggeration and misdirection
 
"Weather is getting consistently more volatile leading to much higher temperatures and colder winters".

Yes well heres one example of when it was reasonably hot for a long period of time 50 years ago to prove you wrong.
We didn't let it bother us either*. Would often go swimming in the unheated puddles that passed for pools back then, after a day spent at school in our short trousers.

*I wasn't born
 
science is never settled, hopefully it will always be challenged but at the moment the `official` consensus is that global man made warming IS settled. you pretend to want a serious debate and i appreciate the almost pious devotion of your charade so i`ll take you at your word. who challenged/debated the `heat island` aspect of my argument? is being critical about the policy of spending £billions on `renewables` illegitimate? btw- like your `1pc of posts on topic` claim, the climate alarmists employ the same strategy of exaggeration and misdirection

Let's try again. The consensus amongst serious scientists is that the issue is settled. Much like germ theory or the concept of gravity.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top