Mine is the rugby tackle on Heitinga. It just sums him up perfectly. He gets frustrated at someone marking him out of the play and thus resorts to a non-football action to cope. I actually laughed when I saw it, then shook my head as I don't understand how he's allowed to get away with such ridiculous actions, repeatedly. It's bizarre and would be hilarious if we didn't have to play against him.
They say it's because the rest of the league are scared of him, to be honest I am a bit. Not of his footballing ability like they claim but every time that they play us he will cause a serious injury to one of our players and get away with it. It's already happened this year to Mirallas, imagine how our season would have gone had Suarez not hurt him in the Goodison derby? For a start we'd have likely won that game, and how much time did Mirallas miss because of it? Not blaming that incident for the failure of our season, we've enough dropped points of our own making for that, but it is something to think about. It's ridiculous that they bang on about Aguero and McManaman not getting bans for their actions since Suarez has got a dozen such incidents he could have been pulled up on.
It's sheer lunacy that they claim he is subject to harsher scrutiny than others considering the amount of bannable offences he commits on the pitch and doesn't get done for.
Never been given a red in the Premier League. And they claim he's the victim of a witch hunt. Do me a favor.
I was going to post something similar, but you've saved me the trouble.
I haven't been to rawk direct, but I came across a site called rawk meltdown. Most, in fact, all of the whinging on there is
ridiculous.
I don't know whether 10 games is appropriate because we've got nothing to go on, but personally, I think his fouls on Mirallas
and Distan were worse than the bite. Some, maybe most, will disagree.
What those Liverpool supporters who think he's been harshly dealt with and victimised should consider is that he's only been
suspended on two occasions. One for 8 matches and now this one for 10.
If he'd been punished for all of the other offences he's guilty of, but which incompetent referees had failed to do, he would've racked up far more than 18 match bans. I'm talking about simulation - lost count - and violent tackles.
Have I missed anything?