Current Affairs Donald Trump POS: Judgement cometh and that right soon

Status
Not open for further replies.
verreauxi said:
The only possible way this could blow up on the Democrats is that if the Republicans continue their insufferably dishonest, hypocritical, anti-democracy/our-party-first-isms. Examples of their destructive anti-American comportment can be found here. And here. And here. And especially here, which I've posted before, but apparently has fallen on deaf ears.
Click to expand...

The more the Democrats try to throw mud at Trump, the more crap there is sticking to their hands while Trump just ducks and dives out of the way.......
 
peteblue said:
Unfortunately, you either obey the law and the processes or it becomes unlawful. However the memo is read, it appears that due process was not followed and that political vested interests have contaminated both the DoJ and FBI. So yes, I would think that the FBI and the Democrats will suffer because of this.........
Click to expand...

Even though Mueller and co are life long republicans
 
peteblue said:
Unfortunately, you either obey the law and the processes or it becomes unlawful. However the memo is read, it appears that due process was not followed and that political vested interests have contaminated both the DoJ and FBI. So yes, I would think that the FBI and the Democrats will suffer because of this.........
Click to expand...
Please list the specific processes that you believe were not followed Pete, even if you give Nunes the benefit of the doubt that he is telling the whole truth and nothing but the truth himself (despite not actually seeing the underlying application.


Please also list what parts of the application you believe were unlawful, btw you might want to read this thread before you do.

Also I presume given your newfound belief that the FBI process is tainted you would support a review of all the Clinton investigations to ensure that they didn't base any of their initial investigations on claims from sources politically hostile to them?
 
Last edited:
LinekersLegs said:
Please list the specific processes that you believe were not followed Pete, even if you give Nunes the benefit of the doubt that he is telling the whole truth and nothing but the truth himself (despite not actually seeing the underlying application.


Please also list what parts of the application you believe were unlawful, btw you might want to read this thread before you do.

Also I presume given your newfound belief that the FBI process is tainted you would support a review of all the Clinton investigations to ensure that they didn't base any of their initial investigations on claims from sources politically hostile to them?
Click to expand...


As far as I know everybody could be telling lies. It is being reported that material information was omitted from the application, process... which may or may not be true. In terms of breaking the law, and I’m not really going to trawl through the law books, but I would have thought that knowingly subverting the process in order to eavesdrop on an American citizen is against the law. But I’m sure it will all come out in the wash.....
 
peteblue said:
As far as I know everybody could be telling lies. It is being reported that material information was omitted from the application, process... which may or may not be true. In terms of breaking the law, and I’m not really going to trawl through the law books, but I would have thought that knowingly subverting the process in order to eavesdrop on an American citizen is against the law. But I’m sure it will all come out in the wash.....
Click to expand...
Healthy skepticism on all information being told by everyone (GOP/Dem/FBI) is a stance I agree with, it just isn't what you were claiming in your post.

I'd be very happy if surveillance laws were tightened and processes more stringent but if there are gross violation involved I'd bet they are more likely to be made against some regular guy in a drug/terrorism investigation than in such a high profile political case as this which is bound to get reviewed by those with different politics.
 
DanEFC92 said:
Click to expand...


Can you drop the charges after a guilty plea ? How would that work exactly ? Bloke is just so odd and his ranting seemingly without any substance and people not only enjoy watching him but take what he says at face value , bizarre. This is the bloke that said his sources had told him it was fake news trump had intended to sack mueller then said the sources had confirmed the story just a heartbeat later .

I simply don’t understand why people seem willing to excuse anything to keep Trump in power , even those within his party that opposed him at various stages during his campaign . Tax cuts can’t be that important surely ?
 
peteblue said:
As far as I know everybody could be telling lies. It is being reported that material information was omitted from the application, process... which may or may not be true. In terms of breaking the law, and I’m not really going to trawl through the law books, but I would have thought that knowingly subverting the process in order to eavesdrop on an American citizen is against the law. But I’m sure it will all come out in the wash.....
Click to expand...

Just so I'm clear, you claim Dems and FBI have not been following the law, and then LL pressed you for specific examples, you back-peddle...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

→ Log in 🔑 Register
🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top