There are other issues here. Whatever he said, racist or whatever, are being fed straight to the press. What if he had been talking about a 1) commercial opportunity or a 2) potential armed conflict. We do not hear about what is said privately by our PM in cabinet or in number 10, we never hear what Putin or any other leader says privately, the USA is shooting itself in the foot at the moment by trying to discredit Trump while all the time merely weakening itself. Whoever releases these comments should be prosecuted. This s**thole report has completely undermined US commercial and political strength in large parts of the world, it may be funny that it hurts Trump but the damage done to your country will be immense. Throughout this thread I’ve argued that you guys are doing your country down by these incessant attacks upon Trump. Get rid of him by all means, but stop this self harm.........
1. He is the president he shouldn't be discussing any of his business with his cabinet or with congress members, if at all.
2. The media wouldn't be in the room for a discussion of this sort nor with most of the people that were from congress at the time he made this comment and it's largely understood secure meetings like this are kept quiet so your point is moot quite simply.
Arrest the member of government or the press for reporting on something he said really Pete? How ridiculous do you sound. It was never meant to be a secure meeting nor was it understood to be. In fact the other meeting of the same ilk was shown live on television and some of the media were in the room for this one allowed to make notes too. As Trump was showing off that he could get something done with both parties.
Do you even understand the protections under the US constitutions?
Or are you yet again giving an opposing view just to disagree with everyone like you normally do.
Pete the problem isn't the reporting of the comments it the fact they were said in the first place that does harm.
Sticking your fingers in your ears and going "Lalalala not happening" doesn't change things - what the hell do you think he says to ambassadors/prime ministers/business people etc when he meets them - suddenly he's diplomatic?
Heck even without this reporting he retweets Britain First, calls Mexicans rapists/drug dealers , describes those throwing nazi salutes "very fine people" and multiple other public abhorrent comments.
Perhaps the reporting will at least get him to temper it a little and/or persuade some of his voters to reconsider their support.
If Theresa may had said that comment at a bipartisan meeting it absolutely would have got out and she’d have resigned . Even in a cabinet meeting , especially in her cabinet , I’d suggest there would be a very good chance it’d get out .
You cannot blame people for reacting to a vile racist comment , if Someonr is arrested for hate speech or assault it’s not the victims fault but the offenders . It’s certainly not the fault of those reporting it .
Er, stones, glasshouse spring to mind
Depressing. Hate those lemmings more than the man himself.
How can you argue against the man if you are not willing or able to understand his appeal to those that support him. Your closed mind will ensure he gets a second term.........
I have trouble reconciling "well educated" and "non ignorant" with "non racist" in this statement. The following things were all known pre-election:
1. Housing discrimination (Known before you have to vote)
2. Central Park 5 lie (Known before you have to vote)
3. Birtherism (Known before you have to vote)
4. Called Mexicans drug dealers (Known before you have to vote)
5. Ban on Muslims (Known before you have to vote)
6. Pardoned Joe Arpaio
7. Nazis are “very fine people”
8. Endorsed slave-supporter Roy Moore
9. Called black countries “shitholes”
Plus the whole talk of building a wall and many other things (should one care to look). So, anyways, an educated, non-ignorant, not-racist person hears all this, and thinks to themself: "I'm smart and well-informed, so I'm gonna give my vote to this unhinged racist." ??!!
Lets be honest, most economies function despite what the government of the day do, not because of it.
Well you shouldn't, and you shouldn't blindly regurgitate chains from Twitter. "Your" list is intentionally misleading at best.
The good news is you didn't write it, you're just falling in line (like Trump's most ardent supporters often do). Here are some examples:
1) Settling discrimination cases happens all the time. I've been involved in literally hundreds. Very few involved clear evidence of prejudice, especially by a principal for the respective company.
2) Trump referred to some Mexicans crossing the border illegally as drug dealers (and rapists I think). The drug dealer part is particularly accurate. He, of course, didn't label them all drug dealers.
3) Trump referred to some of the protestors in Charlottesville on the pro-flag side as "very fine people." They obviously weren't all Nazis. You can say what you want about pro confederate heritage type people and whether they can be inherently good despite that viewpoint, but Trump is probably right here. His comments were tone deaf, however, and a lack of leadership at times where the country needs it is the real issue.
4) Roy Moore is an idiot, but he doesn't support slavery. He made a dumb slavery comment, but otherwise has no record of supporting slavery in any other legitimate sense. Of course, Trump didn't support Moore's comment in any notable way and didn't support Moore in the GOP primary.
5) He did call countries in Africa shitholes. Plenty of them are. The handwringing over calling bad countries a bad word is ridiculous. Trump, once again, doesn't know how to act like a President should act, and that's my problem.
I’m giving a view. You appear to be the one opposing said view.......
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.