Current Affairs Donald Trump POS: Judgement cometh and that right soon

Status
Not open for further replies.
some seasonal schadenfreude to warm your hearts with: millionaire traders - the glorified butlers of the inheritance class - are irked that the tax cuts disproportionately benefit only their billionaire clients. aw...

Inside Wall Street's Towers, Traders Grouse Over Trump Tax Plan
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...t-s-towers-traders-grouse-over-trump-tax-plan

They thought they’d be celebrating.

Wall Street traders who rake in hundreds of thousands of dollars a year or more eagerly awaited a Republican overhaul of the U.S. tax code. Now, many are huddling with accountants and concluding the real gains will go to billionaires and other captains of the industry. Those in trenches -- the merely wealthy -- are grousing.

Atop their list of worries: New limits on deductions for mortgage interest and state and local taxes -- relatively high throughout New York, New Jersey and Connecticut -- will cost them thousands of dollars annually while depressing the value of their homes. That would chop local tax revenues and erode the quality of schools and other amenities traders expect for their families.

As Christmas approaches and business slows, many on Wall Street are distracted by the tax bill, calculating how it may help or hurt, and looking for ways to maximize gains or minimize losses. Most spoke on the condition they not be named. Many were self-aware enough to realize they won’t garner sympathy.

Frustrated Republicans
One trader, sipping a Bloody Mary on a morning flight to somewhere more tropical, said he’s going to stop registering as a Republican. En route, he sent more than a dozen text messages ripping the tax bill.

A pair of hedge fund managers said they’ll stop donating to Republicans they’ve long supported. One of them said he spent weeks berating a politician who’s taken his money, arguing the tax bill is too tilted toward corporations, rather than individuals who should get more relief.

“My clients are hard-working young professionals on Wall Street. I don’t have a lot of good news for them,” said Douglas Boneparth, a financial adviser in lower Manhattan who counsels people throughout the industry. Most are coming to terms with it. “I don’t think anyone is going to be surprised by the economic reality.”

Not everyone is furious.

“It’s going to hurt, obviously,” said Mike Dean, a broker in New York for TP ICAP Plc who voted for Donald Trump in last year’s presidential election. Dean said he’s made roughly $250,000 to $400,000 over each of the past five years, lives in New York and has a second place in Long Island. He sees the tax bump as “begrudgingly making an investment in the future of the economy.”

“In the coming years, I’m going to do better in my earnings because of the corporate tax cut,” he said. “Yet the near term is I’m going to have to pay more.”

The biggest source of pain in the tax bill is its limits on deductions. It eliminates the deduction for unreimbursed employee expenses, for example, and caps at $10,000 the deduction for local and state taxes. Homeowners can still deduct mortgage interest, but the cap for new loans would be $750,000, down from $1 million. The median asking price for a resale home in Manhattan is almost $1 million.

Nationally, affluent Americans will fare well under the bill inching toward final passage. According to an analysis by the Tax Policy Center, the biggest beneficiaries in 2018 would be taxpayers in the 95th to 99th percentiles, earning $307,900 to $732,800. The group’s after-tax incomes would rise an estimated 4.1 percent next year, compared with 2.2 percent for the average taxpayer.

But Manhattan’s army of salaried financial professionals are in a niche where the benefits thin out.

They’ll still get goodies such as a higher threshold for the alternative minimum tax, and a drop in the top marginal rate to 37 percent from 39.6 percent. But, along with losing key deductions, they’re explicitly barred from a new 20 percent tax deduction aimed at business owners. Like doctors, lawyers and other service professionals, they can only get the full pass-through break if they own their own firm and earn less than $315,000 for a married couple, and half that for single taxpayers.

Considering all of that, several traders estimated they may just break even. Meanwhile, they’re at least benefiting from higher stock prices.

One hedge fund manager in Greenwich, Connecticut, said his employees gathered to determine how much the proposed limit on deducting mortgage interest might cost for a new home. They estimated people like them, with homes worth around $2 million in New York or Connecticut, would be out $700 per month.

Because the tax bill benefits business owners, some financial advisers at big firms like Morgan Stanley and Bank of America Corp.’s Merrill Lynch might fare better by striking out on their own.

“This provides a clear incentive for financial advisers to go independent,” said Louis Diamond of Diamond Consultants. “We’re hearing from a lot of clients on this; it’s just another reason why it makes a ton of sense, economically, to become self-employed.”

Another -- perhaps more drastic -- option is to move away. But that’s not likely to happen, said Todd Morgan, chairman of Bel Air Investment Advisors in Los Angeles -- another high-tax area.

If you’re already rich, “why would you move to another state and live a different life just to save some money on taxes?” he said. “What are you going to do with the money? Buy more clothes? Eat more food?”
 
some seasonal schadenfreude to warm your hearts with: millionaire traders - the glorified butlers of the inheritance class - are irked that the tax cuts disproportionately benefit only their billionaire clients. aw...

Inside Wall Street's Towers, Traders Grouse Over Trump Tax Plan
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...t-s-towers-traders-grouse-over-trump-tax-plan

They thought they’d be celebrating.

Wall Street traders who rake in hundreds of thousands of dollars a year or more eagerly awaited a Republican overhaul of the U.S. tax code. Now, many are huddling with accountants and concluding the real gains will go to billionaires and other captains of the industry. Those in trenches -- the merely wealthy -- are grousing.

Atop their list of worries: New limits on deductions for mortgage interest and state and local taxes -- relatively high throughout New York, New Jersey and Connecticut -- will cost them thousands of dollars annually while depressing the value of their homes. That would chop local tax revenues and erode the quality of schools and other amenities traders expect for their families.

As Christmas approaches and business slows, many on Wall Street are distracted by the tax bill, calculating how it may help or hurt, and looking for ways to maximize gains or minimize losses. Most spoke on the condition they not be named. Many were self-aware enough to realize they won’t garner sympathy.

Frustrated Republicans
One trader, sipping a Bloody Mary on a morning flight to somewhere more tropical, said he’s going to stop registering as a Republican. En route, he sent more than a dozen text messages ripping the tax bill.

A pair of hedge fund managers said they’ll stop donating to Republicans they’ve long supported. One of them said he spent weeks berating a politician who’s taken his money, arguing the tax bill is too tilted toward corporations, rather than individuals who should get more relief.

“My clients are hard-working young professionals on Wall Street. I don’t have a lot of good news for them,” said Douglas Boneparth, a financial adviser in lower Manhattan who counsels people throughout the industry. Most are coming to terms with it. “I don’t think anyone is going to be surprised by the economic reality.”

Not everyone is furious.

“It’s going to hurt, obviously,” said Mike Dean, a broker in New York for TP ICAP Plc who voted for Donald Trump in last year’s presidential election. Dean said he’s made roughly $250,000 to $400,000 over each of the past five years, lives in New York and has a second place in Long Island. He sees the tax bump as “begrudgingly making an investment in the future of the economy.”

“In the coming years, I’m going to do better in my earnings because of the corporate tax cut,” he said. “Yet the near term is I’m going to have to pay more.”

The biggest source of pain in the tax bill is its limits on deductions. It eliminates the deduction for unreimbursed employee expenses, for example, and caps at $10,000 the deduction for local and state taxes. Homeowners can still deduct mortgage interest, but the cap for new loans would be $750,000, down from $1 million. The median asking price for a resale home in Manhattan is almost $1 million.

Nationally, affluent Americans will fare well under the bill inching toward final passage. According to an analysis by the Tax Policy Center, the biggest beneficiaries in 2018 would be taxpayers in the 95th to 99th percentiles, earning $307,900 to $732,800. The group’s after-tax incomes would rise an estimated 4.1 percent next year, compared with 2.2 percent for the average taxpayer.

But Manhattan’s army of salaried financial professionals are in a niche where the benefits thin out.

They’ll still get goodies such as a higher threshold for the alternative minimum tax, and a drop in the top marginal rate to 37 percent from 39.6 percent. But, along with losing key deductions, they’re explicitly barred from a new 20 percent tax deduction aimed at business owners. Like doctors, lawyers and other service professionals, they can only get the full pass-through break if they own their own firm and earn less than $315,000 for a married couple, and half that for single taxpayers.

Considering all of that, several traders estimated they may just break even. Meanwhile, they’re at least benefiting from higher stock prices.

One hedge fund manager in Greenwich, Connecticut, said his employees gathered to determine how much the proposed limit on deducting mortgage interest might cost for a new home. They estimated people like them, with homes worth around $2 million in New York or Connecticut, would be out $700 per month.

Because the tax bill benefits business owners, some financial advisers at big firms like Morgan Stanley and Bank of America Corp.’s Merrill Lynch might fare better by striking out on their own.

“This provides a clear incentive for financial advisers to go independent,” said Louis Diamond of Diamond Consultants. “We’re hearing from a lot of clients on this; it’s just another reason why it makes a ton of sense, economically, to become self-employed.”

Another -- perhaps more drastic -- option is to move away. But that’s not likely to happen, said Todd Morgan, chairman of Bel Air Investment Advisors in Los Angeles -- another high-tax area.

If you’re already rich, “why would you move to another state and live a different life just to save some money on taxes?” he said. “What are you going to do with the money? Buy more clothes? Eat more food?”

As a CPA, as part of my continuing education I"m required to do a certain amount of courses over a 2 year period. At the one I went to last month, this article is essentially what they told us - the tax bill was going to hurt the upper middle class more than anyone else, particularly in states with high income tax, like Illinois, Jersey, New York, etc. The media does kind of make it like poor people are worse off in the bill or somehow paying more taxes, but this isn't the case. It's that those rich enough to live a certain lifestyle would get screwed, and the biggest beneficiaries were twofold - the Super Rich, who are actually the truly wealthy people, not the grinding professional types, and corporations.

I know, I know. On the one hand why feel sorry for someone making $150,000 year? Well that amount of money isn't that much in New York or New Jersey, and sure they don't need to buy a $1 million apartment and can move to Nebraska to sell insurance. But everything is relative. The tax bill is certainly going to hurt "poor" rich people much more than any other demographic
 
As a CPA, as part of my continuing education I"m required to do a certain amount of courses over a 2 year period. At the one I went to last month, this article is essentially what they told us - the tax bill was going to hurt the upper middle class more than anyone else, particularly in states with high income tax, like Illinois, Jersey, New York, etc. The media does kind of make it like poor people are worse off in the bill or somehow paying more taxes, but this isn't the case. It's that those rich enough to live a certain lifestyle would get screwed, and the biggest beneficiaries were twofold - the Super Rich, who are actually the truly wealthy people, not the grinding professional types, and corporations.

I know, I know. On the one hand why feel sorry for someone making $150,000 year? Well that amount of money isn't that much in New York or New Jersey, and sure they don't need to buy a $1 million apartment and can move to Nebraska to sell insurance. But everything is relative. The tax bill is certainly going to hurt "poor" rich people much more than any other demographic
My heart truly bleeds for them
 
As a CPA, as part of my continuing education I"m required to do a certain amount of courses over a 2 year period. At the one I went to last month, this article is essentially what they told us - the tax bill was going to hurt the upper middle class more than anyone else, particularly in states with high income tax, like Illinois, Jersey, New York, etc. The media does kind of make it like poor people are worse off in the bill or somehow paying more taxes, but this isn't the case. It's that those rich enough to live a certain lifestyle would get screwed, and the biggest beneficiaries were twofold - the Super Rich, who are actually the truly wealthy people, not the grinding professional types, and corporations.

I know, I know. On the one hand why feel sorry for someone making $150,000 year? Well that amount of money isn't that much in New York or New Jersey, and sure they don't need to buy a $1 million apartment and can move to Nebraska to sell insurance. But everything is relative. The tax bill is certainly going to hurt "poor" rich people much more than any other demographic

I think you're generally probably right... although the whole thing is so shoddy and hastily assembled that it will likely take some time before the impact becomes clear. The truth is that elite professionals in the US should probably be paying higher taxes - but in order to address the terrible quality of most American schools, roads, transit, and hospitals, rather than to make the grandchildren of billionaires more comfortable. I wouldn't have minded my taxes shooting up after getting a real job if it had meant the local school got the funding it needed, but my contribution will have instead obviously helped to facilitate companies with more cash reserves than the government itself conduct still more stock buy-backs. And this certainly reinforces the feeling that we picked the right time to leave.

It is sort of amusing though to see life-long Republican Wall Street millionaires slowly starting to realise that they're the mark here.

And, if they don't end up extending the CHIP, there really will be thousands of poor children who directly suffer from this.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think you're generally probably right... although the whole thing is so shoddy and hastily assembled that it will likely take some time before the impact becomes clear. The truth is that elite professionals in the US should probably be paying higher taxes - but in order to address the terrible quality of most American schools, roads, transit, and hospitals, rather than to make the grandchildren of billionaires more comfortable. I wouldn't have minded my taxes shooting up after getting a real job if it had meant the local school got the funding it needed, but my contribution will have instead obviously helped to facilitate companies with more cash reserves than the government itself conduct still more stock buy-backs. And this certainly reinforces the feeling that we picked the right time to leave.

It is sort of amusing though to see life-long Republican Wall Street millionaires slowly starting to realise that they're the mark here.

And, if they don't end up extending the CHIP, there really will be thousands of poor children who directly suffer from this.
This is the rub really. I wouldn't mind paying higher taxes like in Canada or Europe if 1) I know I was paying my fair share, as well as those more rich than me, and 2) I saw it going to infrastructure, universal healthcare, etc - something for the greater good. However, we all know this doesn't happen, and when we see the tax cuts for the wealthiest and for corporations, we immediately go into self preservation mode.
 
This is the rub really. I wouldn't mind paying higher taxes like in Canada or Europe

Americans often assume this, but it's only really true for those who are very elite - and almost never true for young professionals. My salary in the US would have been taxed at a lower rate in Canada, the UK, and the Netherlands. I haven't had to investigate other countries, but I expect it also holds true in most other places.

By moving back to Britain, I'm paying lower taxes and getting the NHS, better schools, and commuter rail. Like so much else about the UK, these are all thoroughly mediocre compared to the rest of the developed world, but still considerably better than what America has to offer someone like me.

For example, we spent the fall in Canada and bought comprehensive private health coverage for Mme. Abelard - it cost less than the co-pay the one time we actually used our top-class private health insurance, provided by my former US employer.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Americans often assume this, but it's only really true for those who are very elite - and almost never true for young professionals. My salary in the US would have been taxed at a lower rate in Canada, the UK, and the Netherlands. I haven't had to investigate other countries, but I expect it also holds true in most other places.

By moving back to Britain, I'm paying lower taxes and getting the NHS, better schools, and commuter rail. Like so much else about the UK, these are all thoroughly mediocre compared to the rest of the developed world, but still considerably better than what America has to offer someone like me.

For example, we spent the fall in Canada and bought comprehensive private health coverage for Mme. Abelard - it cost less than the co-pay the one time we actually used our top-class private health insurance, provided by my former US employer.
I guess that's why all tennis players live in Monaco, eh mate? Avoiding the taxes from their home countries.
 
I guess that's why all tennis players live in Monaco, eh mate? Avoiding the taxes from their home countries.

That's pretty much the only reason why Monaco exists.

In the 1960s, De Gaulle got so fed up with tax evasion that he blockaded Monaco and threatened to cut off the water supply. The Kingdom immediately relented, and from then on, French nationals who live there have had to pay the full tax rate to the French government.

We could eliminate overseas tax havens just as easily now, if we had the political will.
 
The European tennis players officially call Monaco home as their place of residence, but I'm assuming they are dual citizens.

Dual citizen as in hold a US and EU passport?

If that's the case they still have to fill out a US tax form and or the exemption form.

I am a dual national and when applying i thought twice about it because if i and the wife ever move back to Ireland we would still file for here.

The only way around it is to denounce US citizenship.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top