Current Affairs Donald Trump POS: Judgement cometh and that right soon

Status
Not open for further replies.
this might be a good time to revisit this one:
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/05/world/asia/north-korea-south-us-nuclear-war.html

In North Korea, ‘Surgical Strike’ Could Spin Into ‘Worst Kind of Fighting’

...The military options are more grim than ever.

Even the most limited strike risks staggering casualties, because North Korea could retaliate with the thousands of artillery pieces it has positioned along its border with the South. Though the arsenal is of limited range and could be destroyed in days, the United States defense secretary, Jim Mattis, recently warned that if North Korea used it, it “would be probably the worst kind of fighting in most people’s lifetimes.”

Beyond that, there is no historical precedent for a military attack aimed at destroying a country’s nuclear arsenal.

The last time the United States is known to have seriously considered attacking the North was in 1994, more than a decade before its first nuclear test. The defense secretary at the time, William J. Perry, asked the Pentagon to prepare plans for a “surgical strike” on a nuclear reactor, but he backed off after concluding it would set off warfare that could leave hundreds of thousands dead.

The stakes are even higher now. American officials believe North Korea has built as many as a dozen nuclear bombs — perhaps many more — and can mount them on missiles capable of hitting much of Japan and South Korea.

Earlier in his term, President Trump tried to change the dynamics of the crisis by forcing the North and its main economic benefactor, China, to reconsider Washington’s willingness to start a war. He spoke bluntly about the possibility of a “major, major conflict” on the Korean Peninsula, ordered warships into nearby waters and vowed to “solve” the nuclear problem.

But Mr. Trump has backed off considerably in recent weeks, emphasizing efforts to pressure China to rein in Mr. Kim with sanctions instead.

After all, a pre-emptive American attack would very likely fail to wipe out North Korea’s arsenal, because some of the North’s facilities are deep in mountain caves or underground and many of its missiles are hidden on mobile launchers.

The North has warned that it would immediately retaliate by launching nuclear missiles.
 
how would you address him then?

sabre-rattling on twitter? done wonders so far.

or cut to the chase with preemptive nuclear war, presumably? and just write off South Korea?

address it properly for us then.

Sabre rattling doesn't work. Sanctions do not work. Being nice does not work. Either allow the Chinese to remove him or do it yourself. There would be no nuclear war, the north would just disappear......
 
Sabre rattling doesn't work. Sanctions do not work. Being nice does not work. Either allow the Chinese to remove him or do it yourself. There would be no nuclear war, the north would just disappear......
After all, a pre-emptive American attack would very likely fail to wipe out North Korea’s arsenal, because some of the North’s facilities are deep in mountain caves or underground and many of its missiles are hidden on mobile launchers.

Try again.
 
you're happy to just keep broadcasting to everyone that you don't have a clue? why stop now, I guess.

yes, and Japan.

Which bit of 'the North would disappear' do you not understand. North Korea has a few vehicles for delivering weapons to neighbouring countries. It also has massive amounts of conventional arms with which to bombard the South. However the USA has the power to obliterate the North, completely, for ever, and its missiles and bombs are proven, they have thousands and they are not undergoing test. I would think the North has maybe the rest of this year to amend its actions or it will cease to exist by 2018.....
 
Which bit of 'the North would disappear' do you not understand. North Korea has a few vehicles for delivering weapons to neighbouring countries. It also has massive amounts of conventional arms with which to bombard the South. However the USA has the power to obliterate the North, completely, for ever, and its missiles and bombs are proven, they have thousands and they are not undergoing test. I would think the North has maybe the rest of this year to amend its actions or it will cease to exist by 2018.....

Rather blase about the prospect of killing 25.37 million people.
 
Which bit of 'the North would disappear' do you not understand. North Korea has a few vehicles for delivering weapons to neighbouring countries. It also has massive amounts of conventional arms with which to bombard the South. However the USA has the power to obliterate the North, completely, for ever, and its missiles and bombs are proven, they have thousands and they are not undergoing test. I would think the North has maybe the rest of this year to amend its actions or it will cease to exist by 2018.....

which part of "nobody who isn't a Tory internet blowhard thinks you can guarantee the elimination of all their nukes?" do you not understand?
 
Rather blase about the prospect of killing 25.37 million people.

If you were the President of the USA and some North Korean nut job kept threatening to deliver nuclear holocaust to the USA, you really would not be that bothered about removing said nutter and his people. If the USA had delivered this message twenty years ago perhaps we would not be wondering what is going to happen. For my money I think Trump will not duck this issue, and I think his military know that they cannot delay much further, one way or another it has to be resolved this year....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top