Current Affairs Donald Trump POS: Judgement cometh and that right soon

Status
Not open for further replies.


That decision illustrates exactly what the problem is with these sorts of cases being dealt with in civil court.

How have they decided that they can't prove he raped her but could prove he sexually assaulted her? The two things rest on exactly the same evidence.
 
How have they decided that they can't prove he raped her but could prove he sexually assaulted her? The two things rest on exactly the same evidence.
My assumption would be the “preponderance of evidence” standard - that Trump‘s own words and the trestimony of other women who accuse him of assaulting them in additions to Caroll’s claim established a pattern of behavior of sexual assault that the jury believed. But that Caroll was the only one who accused him of rape and they presumably believe she did not clear that bar in terms of evidence she provided.

However I assume we will here details from jurors themselves as to why they made that distinction.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top