and the tate brothers?
I think it is code for "cry-wank over a picture of Andrew Tate while blaming women for not finding him sexually attractive enough to have his theoretical children".We'll get to the bottom of 'go nuclear' yet...
We'll get to the bottom of 'go nuclear' yet...
I thought it was a prelude to a campaign for the USA to become a net provider of energy.Go nuclear in a football thread. I think that's what any reasonable person would have concluded from my post. Did you seriously think that by 'going nuclear' it meant that I personally was going to take down POTUS in a masterful legal, political and PR campaign? Sheesh.
Clearly Ashley was asking for it by taking a shower on the same planet where males exist.He was referring to an alleged exerpt in Ashley Biden's diary where she said Joe would walk in on her when she was showering. Of course, such a diary excerpt has never actually been seen or mentioned by Ashley Biden herself and only exists through reports and memes on the type of website you'd imagine this twerp would read.
![]()
No Evidence Ashley Biden Said She Feared Her Father 'Coming in the Shower' with Her
The alleged quote has been circulating online for months without a shred of evidence to support it.www.snopes.com
Don't let it distract you from the fact that he thinks all women are gold-digging liars and that the trauma of sexual assault is a trivial thing women should be able to overcome in seconds
It's Snopes ffs. Well the diary was found amongst items that were definitely Ashley Biden's. The FBi have admitted as much. What is harder to confirm is the authenticity of the diary itself. The allegations are plausible considering what we know of Biden but they are a bit too on the nose for me to take at face value. Now, I seem to be the only one on this thread who can admit the people CAN have ulterior motives with these type of allegations. If one person can have an ulterior motive 22 people can have the same ulterior motives, especially when most of these allegations only come out during a political campaign.He was referring to an alleged exerpt in Ashley Biden's diary where she said Joe would walk in on her when she was showering. Of course, such a diary excerpt has never actually been seen or mentioned by Ashley Biden herself and only exists through reports and memes on the type of website you'd imagine this twerp would read.
![]()
No Evidence Ashley Biden Said She Feared Her Father 'Coming in the Shower' with Her
The alleged quote has been circulating online for months without a shred of evidence to support it.www.snopes.com
Don't let it distract you from the fact that he thinks all women are gold-digging liars and that the trauma of sexual assault is a trivial thing women should be able to overcome in seconds
It's Snopes ffs. Well the diary was found amongst items that were definitely Ashley Biden's. The FBi have admitted as much. What is harder to confirm is the authenticity of the diary itself. The allegations are plausible considering what we know of Biden but they are a bit too on the nose for me to take at face value. Now, I seem to be the only one on this thread who can admit the people CAN have ulterior motives with these type of allegations. If one person can have an ulterior motive 22 people can have the same ulterior motives, especially when most of these allegations only come out during a political campaign.

Another figure who was unfairly persecuted by his political opponents.
You're doing alright here for a dyslexic Trump supporter. Well done pet.Another figure who was unfairly persecuted by his political opponents.
Are you comparing Donald Trump with Jesus Christ?Another figure who was unfairly persecuted by his political opponents.
But my understanding is it is already applied to every other criminal offense.Again though "alternate venue for some form of justice" is something that should worry everyone, if its applied to every criminal offence.
For harrassment and the very lowest-level sexual assaults, I agree some form of civil remedy should be considered where the victim supports it - however for serious assaults like rape, abductions or murder we cannot have a two-tier system of justice where the wealthy can pay a financial penalty when the rest face lengthy jail sentences. Saying that its more difficult to convict a wealthy person is a justification for improving the standard of and resources available to public prosecutors and the investigation of these offences, not for removing the sentences that the wealthy face if found guilty.
Otherwise we will (and are in the US) end up with an alternate system where victims of rape can be faced a choice of on the one hand with being dragged through the court process, possibly being publicly gone after by the media (as happened to Nafissatou Diallo and Ambra Guiterrez) and at best seeing the perp locked up, or on the other going down the civil route in the hope of getting compo or being paid to go away - something that isnt so far away from the NDAs that Weinstein and other abusers habitually use to cover up their crimes.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.