Here's the alt-right argument being made here.
Amy Klobuchar, a former state attorney (basically, state prosecutor) in Minnesota, had multiple opportunities to discipline and/or terminate the officer whose knee caused the death of George Floyd. At each of these, she declined to discipline this guy. She is currently under consideration for the VP slot, coincidentally. We can change the 'is' to 'was' in the preceding sentence, I think.
The case the alt-right makes is that public service unionized employees (including first responders like Derek Chauvin) and the Democrats are partners in progress, from a political perspective. The kind of harsh discipline associated with the alt-right and Republicans would have sent this guy down the road and out of the force years ago, but that would have upset police union advocates who have more clout in the Minnesota DFL party than their base generally realizes. (This part is the dirty secret concealed in the package.) Like most arguments on either side, it sounds specious unless it fits into the socket in one's thinking that already believes that this is true.
If this information comes from the left, it is described as "investigative journalism." If it comes from the right, it is described as "conspiracy theory."
edit - changed job description of Klobuchar from AG to state attorney.
