Current Affairs Donald Trump POS: Judgement cometh and that right soon

Status
Not open for further replies.
What's your concern about USA being that you are in Birkenhead...

It's none of your business...
Not that he needs anyone to jump to his defense but...

What's your concern about what he reads or posts about. It's none of your business. See how that works?

Something doesn't have to affect you personally or geographically to be interested in it or to discuss it.
 
We'd have to close the forum if we were restricted to talking only about things that were our business. Even for a lad who talks utter pipe at the best of times, that's a real corker from Yakinblue there
Indeed.

I think GOT would have way less members if the only ones able to have opinions on our beloved blues were those from Liverpool.

I bet he comes back and says he is being sarcastic. It was a joke. They always do.
 
What's your concern about USA being that you are in Birkenhead...

It's none of your business...
Had to take you off ignore to read this.

As has been mentioned “it’s none of your business” what I take an interest in, but since you asked:

1) I have family in America
2) I lived in the US for a year myself and still have friends there who are directly impacted by what he does.
3) Contrary to modern opinion it’s possible to care about people you’ve never met and the issues that affect and cause damage/suffering to them
4) Anyone who thinks the actions of the US President (and government in general) only affect those who live within that country’s borders, is a clinical moron.

Is that enough reasons for you?
 

I actually wanted to respond to this post then I saw that other guys stupid post to you. I forgot to then reply.

I have been saying this to fellow conservatives and well friends in general who think it will be an easy election for Trump.

Like I have mentioned here before there are plenty off us who dont support him and this impeachment plus his behaviour off late is pushing them away.

There is only so much people can take when it comes to loyalty and support.

The democrats need to be smart and pick the right candidate and focus on things people will get behind.

The healthcare thing is too much of a push for me. Going all in on free for all is not viable in a short term and could lose voters.

Trump is losing himself support they need to be wary of that and not overthink it.

As for the GOP the party i have supported for so long they are now stuck in a bind. Its support him or get attacked by him and his nutcases and potentially lose their seat.
 
The healthcare thing is too much of a push for me. Going all in on free for all is not viable in a short term and could lose voters.
Couple of quick questions here - mostly because it's kinda rare these days to find conservatives/Republicans who you can have a sensible conversation with - online at least...

RE: the bold bit

Why is this? The US government spends ~$4,500 per person in the country on healthcare (~$1.5 trillion, or 8% of GDP), plus another $5,700 per capita of private spending (another $2.5T). In the UK we fund the NHS on about £2,000 ($2,500) per person (£129 billion/$167 billion) and cover every man woman and child in the country.

Doesn't seem like an unreasonable proposition to expect for everyone to be covered, whatever their need, when you look at the spending levels.

Second question is: Which candidate(s) on the Dem side would you vote for, and which wouldn't you? Would you vote for Trump ahead of any of them, or just abstain if one of the "no's" got the nomination?

Apologies if you've answered either of these previously.
 
Couple of quick questions here - mostly because it's kinda rare these days to find conservatives/Republicans who you can have a sensible conversation with - online at least...

RE: the bold bit

Why is this? The US government spends ~$4,500 per person in the country on healthcare (~$1.5 trillion, or 8% of GDP), plus another $5,700 per capita of private spending (another $2.5T). In the UK we fund the NHS on about £2,000 ($2,500) per person (£129 billion/$167 billion) and cover every man woman and child in the country.

Doesn't seem like an unreasonable proposition to expect for everyone to be covered, whatever their need, when you look at the spending levels.

Second question is: Which candidate(s) on the Dem side would you vote for, and which wouldn't you? Would you vote for Trump ahead of any of them, or just abstain if one of the "no's" got the nomination?

Apologies if you've answered either of these previously.
It's not that it's not do able. It is. But its the approach and the amount off time it will take to push through.

There are several sticking blocks for me to convince moderate or even sensible conservatives. They are

Where will you take the funding from? Ultimately the money will have to be taken from a budget eleswhere.

Also what happens to the private insurers. The make billions so they could survive but the many thousands of people may not. The four big companies in the insurance business hire at.least 100,000 between them. Not forgetting the pharma companies and distributors in their groups.

These companies also pay thousands in donation to politicians on both sides remember. The minute you go after them they will get tough.

It would take longer than four years too. Focus too much on it just like Obama care the opponents will simply spend four years bashing it. Making it seem you are doing nothing. Obama carenhad its merits and I'll admit in principal it was an good idea and worked out for some. But it got resistance a lot of it especially at the state level. So ultimately it failed or came close to failing.

Another thing is perception. Many conservatives cannot get their head around the whole socialism thing. They have the antiquated belief that it's the red countries like Russia, china and NK. Many GOP followers are about money and profit. They are not all religious backwoods people or farmers. Go after their perceived bottom line and they wont deal with you.

I wont vote Trump again and I'm not sure who I would.

I would never vote for Sanders. I see his appeal. He comes across like he wants to give everything away but has no plans. Pretty much tells people what they want to hear. He would be better than Trump that's for sure.

Mayor pete as he has been called would be decent but I think he came in way too soon. In fact many of them did. This rush of blood thing to beat trump is slightly embarrasing. Way too many useless or too soon candidates.

Although I am not a fan of hers Warren is probably one of the better candidates. Simply because the faux socialist act she is pulling isnt fooling anyone. She further to the right than she let's on. I dont even believe her when she says she will go after banks etc.... she is playing the game nicely.

Pick biden and you will lose. Hes as bad and dithering as trump and trump will beat him in a debate although i suspect it will look like two old geezers going at it at a bus stop rambling nonsense.
 
Having a go at California now to rake their forests again. Used to think he was playing the distraction game, now I just think he's absolutely brain dead and just likes to see his thoughts and see the likes from his bots/cult.
 

These are the items I always bring up when talking to other conservatives.

If it were a neighbor or a family member you would at the very least avoid them and be suspicious.

Two types of people pull stunts like this. Criminals and paranoid anti government types.

So it's no surprise what his base is made up off.

The sad part is the other conservatives turning a blind eye and ignoring it. Or simply supporting him because it's their party and oh it's fun to see liberals upset over everything he says and does.

Everyone except his nutty base should be perturbed over how he acts.

The one thing I was hesitant about when voting for him was how he would be perceived by the world. He is embarrasing and has accomplished nothing productive with our allies nor potential opportunities in trade with long standing difficult countries. He is a laughing stock such that he is even being used by Kim.

No politician is a saint nor are they generally honest but at least pretend to be. Being open about shady tactics and behavior just not just tell Americans you cannot be trusted it tells the whole world especially those leaders looking to take advantage off him.

Dictators and strongmen only work in countries with broken democracies. He needs to realise that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top