Current Affairs Donald Trump POS: Judgement cometh and that right soon

Status
Not open for further replies.
It would follow then that the future is to be determined by those who are most numerous. Ignorant individuals vs those who are not similarly ignorant.

First, let's define what ignorance encompasses, and then we can drill down into it a bit more. I saw it posted somewhere that the sort of individual found ignorant regarding the political arguments discussed by experts is often the person those experts call to have a vital system repaired in their business, residence, or vehicle. The point being that we are all ignorant, and that the conflict is over what knowledge is important. Knowledge of what? The answer. To what?

Is he/she racist? Is this metric? Will contact between these metals create a galvanic deterioration over time? Is this Chinese trumpet tuned to A = 440 or 444?

What must I believe to be true? What expression will lead to being accused of Facecrime?

It is a difficult, complicated time we live in I suppose. Same as it ever was.

Well in regards to the post I was responding to, I think it shows incredible ignorance (at best) if people think it's a good thing that the president's language (and often message) is that of ignorant Joe Six Pack from Dothan, Alabama.

I mean Joe Six Pack is the kind of guy who would look at snow on the ground and say we need more of that global warming the eggheads keep telling us about.
 
It would follow then that the future is to be determined by those who are most numerous. Ignorant individuals vs those who are not similarly ignorant.

First, let's define what ignorance encompasses, and then we can drill down into it a bit more. I saw it posted somewhere that the sort of individual found ignorant regarding the political arguments discussed by experts is often the person those experts call to have a vital system repaired in their business, residence, or vehicle. The point being that we are all ignorant, and that the conflict is over what knowledge is important. Knowledge of what? The answer. To what?

Is he/she racist? Is this metric? Will contact between these metals create a galvanic deterioration over time? Is this Chinese trumpet tuned to A = 440 or 444?

What must I believe to be true? What expression will lead to being accused of Facecrime?

It is a difficult, complicated time we live in I suppose. Same as it ever was.

Flippant remarks about the morons across the aisle aside (of the sort to which I have NEVER, EVER resorted), there are dividends when we try a bit harder to understand why people reach positions or make decisions which are illogical.

It was overwhelmed by the JD Vance hype machine, but the Arlie Hochschild book is much better, and really will help liberals comprehend people who they would otherwise find baffling.

Likewise, in the spirit of equal opportunity and inclusion, conservatives like Kevin Williamson, who've made a career of passing the rhetoric once applied to blacks (before it became declassé even at Even The National Review) on to poor whites instead, would benefit from basic scientific literacy about poverty.

Still, mezzrow, it is easy, and lazy, to position oneself on high, wise and detached, and eyeing with bemusement the social media-induced confusion of the masses below.

But you, more than anyone else on here, fall for truly disgusting conspiracy theories peddled by heartless, cynical people all the time - Seth Rich, Imran Awan, et al - and I've never once seen you own up to it, much less try to learn anything. Your latest post on Imran Awan was truly pathetic.

If you are going to demand honesty and humility from the liberal media, never mind the rest of us, then shouldn't you yourself be willing, to quote one of the greatest minds in Western Civilisation, to "clean up your room and sort yourself out, Bucko"?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Flippant remarks about the morons across the aisle aside (of the sort to which I have NEVER, EVER resorted), there are dividends when we try a bit harder to understand why people reach positions or make decisions which are illogical.

It was overwhelmed by the JD Vance hype machine, but the Arlie Hochschild book is much better, and really will help liberals comprehend people who they would otherwise find baffling.

Likewise, in the spirit of equal opportunity and inclusion, conservatives like Kevin Williamson, who've made a career of passing the rhetoric once applied to blacks (before it became declassé even at Even The National Review) on to poor whites instead, would benefit from basic scientific literacy about poverty.

Still, mezzrow, it is easy, and lazy, to position oneself on high, wise and detached, and eyeing with bemusement the social media-induced confusion of the masses below.

But you, more than anyone else on here, fall for truly disgusting conspiracy theories peddled by heartless, cynical people all the time - Seth Rich, Imran Awan, et al - and I've never once seen you own up to it, much less try to learn anything. Your latest post on Imran Awan was truly pathetic.

If you are going to demand honesty and humility from the liberal media, never mind the rest of us, then shouldn't you yourself be willing, to quote one of the greatest minds in Western Civilisation, to "clean up your room and sort yourself out, Bucko"?
This pathetic mortal appreciates your concern. I don't know if I was trying at the time, but I'm long past expecting or demanding (any more) honesty and humility from the liberal (or the conservative) media. The Hochschild book was a lovely effort. People have too many stereotypes in their head when they think about what it is to be poor.

Best to all here. Good luck with the answers.
 
For someone who constantly wants to remind us of their blue collar roots and the good, unpretentious American folks who work honest blue-collar jobs, you'd think they could write in plain English--speak to the common man and all that--rather than stilted intellectual gibberish filled with gee-ain't-I-smart roundabout references.
 
White House press secretary Sarah Sanders has told a religious television network that God "wanted Donald Trump to become president".

Ms Sanders made the claim in an interview with the Christian Broadcasting Network (CBN), saying it was the reason Mr Trump was in office.
Responding to Mr Brady's question about Mr

Trump's position, Ms Sanders said: "I think God calls all of us to fill different roles at different times and I think that He wanted Donald Trump to become president."
 
White House press secretary Sarah Sanders has told a religious television network that God "wanted Donald Trump to become president".

Ms Sanders made the claim in an interview with the Christian Broadcasting Network (CBN), saying it was the reason Mr Trump was in office.
Responding to Mr Brady's question about Mr

Trump's position, Ms Sanders said: "I think God calls all of us to fill different roles at different times and I think that He wanted Donald Trump to become president."
 
This is truly unbearable...


Clearly very traumatic. I am happy she is reunited with her mother. A mother and her young child should never be separated, regardless of the circumstances. But I wonder why her mother didn't try and enter the country legally? Or why she didn't settle in Mexico, which is a safe country compared to where she came from? I'd love to live in the States, but I am not allowed, and I have no intention of trying to enter illegally.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top