Current Affairs Donald Trump POS: Judgement cometh and that right soon

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think it's funny when Americans refer to right and left wing politics when really it's a right-wing party and a further right-wing party.

The only difference is the democrats sign up to identity politics by giving lip service to minority groups.

They are both in agreement when it comes to the major issues.

It's because they are both owned by the same corporations.

That's both the politicians and the media.
 
I think it's funny when Americans refer to right and left wing politics when really it's a right-wing party and a further right-wing party.

The only difference is the democrats sign up to identity politics by giving lip service to minority groups.

They are both in agreement when it comes to the major issues.

It's because they are both owned by the same corporations.

That's both the politicians and the media.

I think you'll find quite a rift on a lot of issues. The environment as an example.
 
I think it's funny when Americans refer to right and left wing politics when really it's a right-wing party and a further right-wing party.

The only difference is the democrats sign up to identity politics by giving lip service to minority groups.

They are both in agreement when it comes to the majort issues.

It's because they are both owned by the same corporations.

That's both the politicians and the media.
Perhaps you can give some examples of what you believe are the major issues and evidence that both parties are in agreement because sitting here in California there seems to be some substantial differences on healthcare, tax policy, women’s right to choose, immigration, environment and gun laws to name just a few.
 
I think it's funny when Americans refer to right and left wing politics when really it's a right-wing party and a further right-wing party.

The only difference is the democrats sign up to identity politics by giving lip service to minority groups.

They are both in agreement when it comes to the major issues.

It's because they are both owned by the same corporations.

That's both the politicians and the media.

Sorry about the brevity of my last post. I think there are fundamental differences between the two parties. This won't be an all inclusive post but I hope it will give you a bit more clarity on the rifts (some vast, some not as much) on the differences between the two parties.

Overall Role of Federal Govt:

Democrats: generally believe it is the government's role to regulate the free market. Without regulation greed and poverty rule the day.

Republicans: generally believe government regulation hinders the free market. Regulation prohibits market growth which in turn prohibits growth for everyone.

I am painting with a broad brush here but I think fundamentally that is one of the biggest core differences between the Left and the Right in this country and I think it dictates the stances on many individual policy issues.

TAXES:

Left: as income increases, taxation increases on a percentage basis.

Right: taxation should be the same percentage for everyone.

HEALTH CARE:

Left: universal health care for all. Programs like Medicare and Medicaid for the elderly, disabled, and poor.

Right: the private sector is a better because the govt wouldn't be able to effectively run health care.

IMMIGRATION:

Left: generally support making immigration easier.

Right: generally believe in strict immigration.

Both do believe it should be regulated.

ENVIRONMENT

Left: strong belief in protecting the environment. Beyond retaining natural beauty the belief is that protection is necessary to avoid destroying the environment.

Right: government protections hinder the country's ability to use it's natural resources. This creates reliance on others and prohibits growth.

RELIGION

Left: generally believe religious beliefs should not play a role in policy. The nation was founded on religious freedom and policies shouldn't infringe on other people's religious beliefs.

Right: generally favor Christian beliefs playing a role in govt policy.

DEATH PENALTY

Left: generally favor life sentence vs death penalty.

Right: generally favor death penalty.

Definitely not as clear on this one. Both sides have a lot of crossover.

GUN CONTROL:

Left: favors varying levels of gun control.

Right: favors less gun control.

Both believe in the 2nd Amendment...just disagree about it's application.

ABORTION:

Left: generally believe it's the woman's right to choose.

Right: generally believe abortion should only be legal in extreme cases.

This is getting way into TL;DR length. This is not all inclusive just a few of the issues off the top of my head.
 
One glaring omission in my TL;DR post @Socrates was equality. I know you mentioned 'identity politics' in your post but it's about equality. I would say the Right played 'identity politics' way more than the Left in this last election cycle by stoking deep seated racism that still exists in this country.

EQUALITY:

Left: all men are created equal. Always fighting for that core American belief.

Right: all men are created equal. Always fighting against that core American belief.

Perhaps that's an unfair view, but from 10,000 feet it's exactly what it looks like to me. Gay marriage was the most recent landmark change in this country in terms of equality. I can't speak for the Right on why they have fought tooth and nail against women's rights, minority rights, and gay rights simply because I don't understand it. On most issues I can see both sides of the coin but in terms of equality I simply do not get it...and on a fundamental level of what America stands for it seems completely against what we supposedly believe as a people.

Care to weigh in conservatives?
 
I am sorry you can equate the 'Antlered Community' with (insert actual minimized humans in America). I despair for you as I know you were once a person of principle.

Sad.
Guess I should just dummy up and let this sit there, but...

Good luck running on this platform in November. I guess humor died in November 2016 for some people. If the antlered community was walking through my yard, I'd be less arsed than if it was a community of MS-13 members. You'd be amazed how many registered voters of both parties would agree, if they were being totally honest.



edit - that said, thanks for caring about the state of my soul, cheesey. This is not snark.
 
We'll just have to disagree. Not including the immediately preceding question is blatant in my opinion, particularly as many of the reports yesterday did include context (just not accurate context). Stuff like "Trump, referring to some immigrants, says they're "not even human."

AP, to their credit, deleted their context-less tweet.

As for imprecise language meaning you can't "whine", I think there are a lot of examples for Trump where this is true. I don't think this is one, nor do I think the media taking things out of context, IMO very intentionally, is something that can/should be glossed over. We have a huge credibility issue with American media, and much of it is very well deserved.
I guess the point is why even make a comment like "not even human", even if describing "some" immigrants.

The point is that I cannot imagine him referring to white hicks living in shanties in Appalachia as "not even human."

That's the problem. Why even go there with inarticulate, headline-grabbing, hyperbolic, insensitive word choices such as this?

Dumb white trash who live in America are sick people, but some immigrants are "not even human"

It boggles the mind.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top