Current Affairs Donald Trump POS: Judgement cometh and that right soon

Status
Not open for further replies.
Apparently, the former Editor in Chief of NY Magazine Ed Klein came out after the election with a report that the reason Hillary sent John Podesta out to give a short speech delaying her concession speech and sending all her supporters home is because insiders say she was up all night crying uncontrollably and blaming President Obama and James Comey for her loss.

Now, more reports are trickling out that it was actually a lot worse than that.

Apparently according to a CNN reporter and a secret service agent who have leaked some info, Hillary was allegedly drunk, described as “Hitler in the bunker” and at one point became violent and flew into a psychotic rage against both John Podesta and Robby Mook.

According to the story, put out by radio personality Todd Kincannon from The Kincannon Show who has a CNN source who he claims has been censored, Hillary’s attacks apparently got so bad that she had to be restrained and her doctor had to give her sedatives.

The first three Tweets here from Kincannon have since been removed, but were archived:

2016-11-17_8-29-31.jpg


While this has not been verified outside of Kincannon’s show, we all know CNN would never in a million years print any “Hillary in the bunker” stories anyway. The network is owned by Time Warner who has been one of Hillary’s largest financial contributors throughout her political career:

2016-11-17_8-39-50.jpg


Clinton News Network (CNN) spent the majority of the election reporting in a manner so overly biased for Hillary.

Another source Tweeting to Kincannon said a secret service source told him that by the time she told Podesta to address her followers, she was “drunk as a skunk” and “allegedly said ‘f@ck them – you do it'”.

According to Gary Franchi of Next News Network, other reports say her campaign staff had been popping champagne much earlier on in the day, celebrating what many of them thought was a foregone conclusion.


Cool

Hardly the most believable source.

Might be true though. She's not wrong that Comey made a difference in the outcome.
 
Apparently, the former Editor in Chief of NY Magazine Ed Klein came out after the election with a report that the reason Hillary sent John Podesta out to give a short speech delaying her concession speech and sending all her supporters home is because insiders say she was up all night crying uncontrollably and blaming President Obama and James Comey for her loss.

Now, more reports are trickling out that it was actually a lot worse than that.

Apparently according to a CNN reporter and a secret service agent who have leaked some info, Hillary was allegedly drunk, described as “Hitler in the bunker” and at one point became violent and flew into a psychotic rage against both John Podesta and Robby Mook.

According to the story, put out by radio personality Todd Kincannon from The Kincannon Show who has a CNN source who he claims has been censored, Hillary’s attacks apparently got so bad that she had to be restrained and her doctor had to give her sedatives.

The first three Tweets here from Kincannon have since been removed, but were archived:

2016-11-17_8-29-31.jpg


While this has not been verified outside of Kincannon’s show, we all know CNN would never in a million years print any “Hillary in the bunker” stories anyway. The network is owned by Time Warner who has been one of Hillary’s largest financial contributors throughout her political career:

2016-11-17_8-39-50.jpg


Clinton News Network (CNN) spent the majority of the election reporting in a manner so overly biased for Hillary.

Another source Tweeting to Kincannon said a secret service source told him that by the time she told Podesta to address her followers, she was “drunk as a skunk” and “allegedly said ‘f@ck them – you do it'”.

According to Gary Franchi of Next News Network, other reports say her campaign staff had been popping champagne much earlier on in the day, celebrating what many of them thought was a foregone conclusion.


Cool
WOW, I think she only has herself to blame, while I'm across the pond it did appear to me that she took her foot off the gas.

In all honesty, if she was that stupid regarding emails then I don't think she's fit to be Potus.
But I still wonder if she did the email thing on purpose, you know, leaking exactly what America wanted to leak.
 
That's your opinion. I disagree.

The Alt Right want to deport all people aren't white. Trump wants to enforce border control. Hardly the same thing is it.

I mean you can't really refute the statement that Trump 'demonstrated misogyny, racism, Islamophobia among many things throughout the campaign.' It's hardly an opinion. Support who you want but you can't deny what they've said and done.
Has everyone gone nuts?!
 
If it comes down to the elites vs Trump / Brexit, the only possible choice is to support the people who actually won the elections in question.

Having an Egypt-style refusal to allow a democratic decision, taken freely and fairly, to be upheld would be unacceptable at the best of times, never mind when its done in the interest of people whose incompetence and general vileness has been so clearly demonstrated these past forty years.

Only issue with that is it then legitimises a system that has kept a majority working and paying for the ecesses and whims of few.

There has to be a way, method or means to take control of a democratic process, accepting that the existing one remains in play. There has to be greater participation yet the populus is disinterested and disengaged, the two showboats of Brexit and Trump spunket took advantage of that disenfranchised element for their own ends, not as a challenge to the existing order, but to accelerate their aims as it had been shuffling rightwards already.
 
WOW, I think she only has herself to blame, while I'm across the pond it did appear to me that she took her foot off the gas.

In all honesty, if she was that stupid regarding emails then I don't think she's fit to be Potus.
But I still wonder if she did the email thing on purpose, you know, leaking exactly what America wanted to leak.

True, if anything it was her 'in the bag' arrogance that lost her votes in the last few days, the timing of the 're-investigation' would have swayed some of the undecided but her disdain for campaigning ultimately cost her, even Obama alluded to it in his fish fry comments.
 
Apparently, the former Editor in Chief of NY Magazine Ed Klein came out after the election with a report that the reason Hillary sent John Podesta out to give a short speech delaying her concession speech and sending all her supporters home is because insiders say she was up all night crying uncontrollably and blaming President Obama and James Comey for her loss.

Now, more reports are trickling out that it was actually a lot worse than that.

Apparently according to a CNN reporter and a secret service agent who have leaked some info, Hillary was allegedly drunk, described as “Hitler in the bunker” and at one point became violent and flew into a psychotic rage against both John Podesta and Robby Mook.

According to the story, put out by radio personality Todd Kincannon from The Kincannon Show who has a CNN source who he claims has been censored, Hillary’s attacks apparently got so bad that she had to be restrained and her doctor had to give her sedatives.

The first three Tweets here from Kincannon have since been removed, but were archived:

2016-11-17_8-29-31.jpg


While this has not been verified outside of Kincannon’s show, we all know CNN would never in a million years print any “Hillary in the bunker” stories anyway. The network is owned by Time Warner who has been one of Hillary’s largest financial contributors throughout her political career:

2016-11-17_8-39-50.jpg


Clinton News Network (CNN) spent the majority of the election reporting in a manner so overly biased for Hillary.

Another source Tweeting to Kincannon said a secret service source told him that by the time she told Podesta to address her followers, she was “drunk as a skunk” and “allegedly said ‘f@ck them – you do it'”.

According to Gary Franchi of Next News Network, other reports say her campaign staff had been popping champagne much earlier on in the day, celebrating what many of them thought was a foregone conclusion.


Cool

I'd take that story with a big pinch of salt. I'd question any stories like this, same with the Trump camp in disarray.

It's trying to spot the true stories in a sea of lies.
 
True, if anything it was her 'in the bag' arrogance that lost her votes in the last few days, the timing of the 're-investigation' would have swayed some of the undecided but her disdain for campaigning ultimately cost her, even Obama alluded to it in his fish fry comments.
think what your getting at is she was an arrogant witch who thought it was her right to govern ,without earning the right to govern .
Typical elitist
 
think what your getting at is she was an arrogant witch who thought it was her right to govern ,without earning the right to govern .
Typical elitist

This.

On top of many amazing things that happened during the campaign one cannot underestimate the strategic brilliance of Trump camp (last minute campaigns in states that have been said to be "The blue wall" of democratic party).
 
Clinton, besides being a warmonger unfit for anything other than a war crimes trial, could not have been seen as a Commander in Chief when she was getting carried into a car a few weeks back. I think that's been underplayed a bit. The tapering off of campaigning had to be down to that and it must have also placed a doubt in the minds of the electorate that she was up to the physicality of the job. She looked absolutely knackered there today.
 
Last edited:
This.

On top of many amazing things that happened during the campaign one cannot underestimate the strategic brilliance of Trump camp (last minute campaigns in states that have been said to be "The blue wall" of democratic party).
It wasn't down to their "brilliance". It was purely a case of cometh the hour cometh the man. His message resonated with enough angry people at this point in time. Look at what he got away with in that election campaign, the racism, the misogyny, the sectarianism. He just ham fisted his way through it in the end because Clinton was the past and just about anyone spouting his BS or even a watered down version of it would get elected.
 
It wasn't down to their "brilliance". It was purely a case of cometh the hour cometh the man. His message resonated with enough angry people at this point in time. Look at what he got away with in that election campaign, the racism, the misogyny, the sectarianism. He just ham fisted his way through it in the end because Clinton was the past and just about anyone spouting his BS or even a watered down version of it would get elected.
you tend to forget the real things and causes that resonated with the puplic. racism and all these other ridiculous accusations are easy reasoning.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top