http://www.kgw.com/news/local/more-than-half-of-arrested-anti-trump-protesters-didnt-vote/351964445Proof or Facebook?
local to Portland, plenty more links out there.
http://www.kgw.com/news/local/more-than-half-of-arrested-anti-trump-protesters-didnt-vote/351964445Proof or Facebook?
have binned the EU thread so over here now to see fair play, don't want the neo liberals shutting down debateThere you go Elong edge beat me to it
On phone at work I put links later
The upshot: Of those taken into custody, KGW found that 39 were registered to vote in Oregon but didn't submit a ballot. Another 33 did vote, while 36 weren't registered in the state and four were not of legal voting age.
"It is unclear if those who aren't registered in Oregon are registered to vote in other states," KGW reported. "Most of those gave Oregon addresses as their official residence in court records."
Not all votes have yet been counted in the presidential contest, which has Clinton winning the popular vote but Trump victorious in the Electoral College.
http://www.kgw.com/news/local/more-than-half-of-arrested-anti-trump-protesters-didnt-vote/351964445
local to Portland, plenty more links out there.
It is done from the relative safety of a clique that will 'look after' each other. It's still the patronising attitude of we were right the public didn't play ball.
This system we call democratic plainly isn't and it is these 'elites' not acknowledging the numerous flaws through want of self interest that has lead to now.
It's like a pincer movement, two highly established and erstwhile 'democracies' now find themselves between a rock and a hard place. On both sides of the Atlantic there are some who are challenging the democratic (sic) process and we are left with avery difficult decision. With Trump and Brexit do we support a challenge to the decision or uphold the democratic process as is? Dowe allow things to run their course in the same way feted capitalist want 'market forces' to dictate the outcome or do we as a collective organise to create a better system utilising the technology wenow have at our disposal?
Problem is very much that the means to create change properly lies somewhat in the very system we need to change.
pretty ugly crowd , can pick up a brick that does nobody any good, but can't pick up a pen that could have done. oddballsLooking at that are they even old enough to vote. Then you have the people who didn't vote moaning and protesting, the yoof of today just want to moan.
I see that confirms the majority were from Oregon and not bussed in as some people have been saying.
It's a hotbed of lies from every direction and people will believe what they want to believe unfortunately.
Embrace the chaos.
Looking at that are they even old enough to vote. Then you have the people who didn't vote moaning and protesting, the yoof of today just want to moan.
I see that confirms the majority were from Oregon and not bussed in as some people have been saying.
It's a hotbed of lies from every direction and people will believe what they want to believe unfortunately.
Embrace the chaos.
That's like a possession, attempts on target stat! Only the result is relevant.The worst candidate with a 2 million vote advantage.
Sure it is. Trump himself demonstrated misogyny, racism, Islamophobia among many things throughout the campaign.
The country I live in believes that 'all men are created equal' not 'all men are created equal unless they are a woman, a Mexican, or a Muslim.'
See the stats above, the claims that 70% didn't vote is incorrect
How do you think the neoconservatives in Washington will feel with Trump as leader, I'd class Hilary as more neoconservative than him.
Their stranglehold over the Republicans foreign policycould be coming tois at an end.
That's like a possession, attempts on target stat! Only the result is relevant.
I'd seen reports that 60% was people from a different state and paid by Soros.
George Soros is the boogieman it seems and is a target of hate.
Apparently, the former Editor in Chief of NY Magazine Ed Klein came out after the election with a report that the reason Hillary sent John Podesta out to give a short speech delaying her concession speech and sending all her supporters home is because insiders say she was up all night crying uncontrollably and blaming President Obama and James Comey for her loss.
Now, more reports are trickling out that it was actually a lot worse than that.
Apparently according to a CNN reporter and a secret service agent who have leaked some info, Hillary was allegedly drunk, described as “Hitler in the bunker” and at one point became violent and flew into a psychotic rage against both John Podesta and Robby Mook.
According to the story, put out by radio personality Todd Kincannon from The Kincannon Show who has a CNN source who he claims has been censored, Hillary’s attacks apparently got so bad that she had to be restrained and her doctor had to give her sedatives.
The first three Tweets here from Kincannon have since been removed, but were archived:
![]()
While this has not been verified outside of Kincannon’s show, we all know CNN would never in a million years print any “Hillary in the bunker” stories anyway. The network is owned by Time Warner who has been one of Hillary’s largest financial contributors throughout her political career:
![]()
Clinton News Network (CNN) spent the majority of the election reporting in a manner so overly biased for Hillary.
Another source Tweeting to Kincannon said a secret service source told him that by the time she told Podesta to address her followers, she was “drunk as a skunk” and “allegedly said ‘f@ck them – you do it'”.
According to Gary Franchi of Next News Network, other reports say her campaign staff had been popping champagne much earlier on in the day, celebrating what many of them thought was a foregone conclusion.
Cool
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.